An Odd Birth Defect

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Shredder

User
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2004
Messages
3,904
Reaction score
4
Could be photoshopped but this baby too should never have seen the light of day, tragic. I guess it's not a big deal since Jean Grey disintegrated it anyway
 

Blake

Full Member
10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2004
Messages
1,801
Reaction score
1
Now I can't go to sleep now. :mad:
 

exmike

NOR * CAL
15+ Year Member
Joined
May 19, 2003
Messages
4,206
Reaction score
13
Shredder said:
Could be photoshopped but this baby too should never have seen the light of day, tragic. I guess it's not a big deal since Jean Grey disintegrated it anyway
its real. it is holoprosencephaly, or a SHH mutation.
 

velo

bottom of the food chain
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2004
Messages
5,573
Reaction score
9
holoprosencephaly I think....Its a possible feature of trisomy 13
 

jonathon

Membership Revoked
Removed
10+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2005
Messages
152
Reaction score
0
prazmatic,

I have seen that before. You missed the point of my post. The oddness of the birth defect was the disfigurement of the face. I have a deep interest in birth defects just so you know. I posted the link because I have not seen a birth defect before where the eyes are below the nose.

This is not a thread about showing off which birth defect is the worst.
 

Gut Shot

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2003
Messages
6,526
Reaction score
108
jonathon said:
The oddness of the birth defect was the disfigurement of the face. I have a deep interest in birth defects just so you know. I posted the link because I have not seen a birth defect before where the eyes are below the nose.

Eh, that's just a little cyclopia. The appendage above the eyes is a proboscis, which isn't a true nose. AFAIK it's formed from the anterosuperior part of the nasal cavity when the normal medial part of the nose is developmentally absent.

There's a nice little summary of holoprosencephaly here.

"The incidence is about to 6-12:10,000 among live born but 40:10,000 in embryos. Half of these are associated with trisomy 13. The sex distribution shows a female predominance."
 

dnw826

Senior Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
220
Reaction score
0
Havarti666 said:
Eh, that's just a little cyclopia. The appendage above the eyes is a proboscis, which isn't a true nose. AFAIK it's formed from the anterosuperior part of the nasal cavity when the normal medial part of the nose is developmentally absent.

There's a nice little summary of holoprosencephaly here.

"The incidence is about to 6-12:10,000 among live born but 40:10,000 in embryos. Half of these are associated with trisomy 13. The sex distribution shows a female predominance."

Good g-d.
 
Top