If you look hard enough in any of the subs this question has been asked and answered 1000x.
I will give you my top three pros and cons for anesthesia vs IM.
Anes pro
1. I truly enjoy camaraderie in the OR.
2. I am the doctor in the OR, whether the surgeons, CRNA, RN admit it or not.
3. No rounds/patients. If I had to “round” again in my life, explain anything to demanding families, who was not there until the very end. I would shoot myself.
Anes cons:
1. You will never get the glory. “Because Dr. IMGASMD’s plan, the patient survived, did well, is alive....” vs “Dr. Bone, fixed the broken fractures, so mom can walk again....”
2. You are somewhat “replaceable”. With AMCs, CRNA, hospital employment, contract take over, not having your own patients. There are plenty of external forces to keep you on your toes.
3. Calls. Most of my older partners, if they could, would never want to take any calls again for rest of their lives. When you’re young it’s one thing, when you’re older the 2am c-section really wears on you.
IM/Traditionalist/Hospitalist pro
1. You have much more freedom. You can choose what your practice want to be. You’re not tied to any other entities. No hospital, no surgi centers, no partners even.
2. You own the patient. If you have a good population base and are good. You may have more business than you know what to do with.
3. You can have a deeper connection with your patients.
Cons:
1. Rounds, family, “begging” the consultants, just constant communications to people that you may or may not want to talk to.
2. Hospitalist, specifically, are also easily replaceable than some other specialities. Also there are plenty of big companies are buying, bidding for Hospitalists contracts.
3. I don’t have a good #3... maybe compensation? I would say starting salary is probably 20-30% less than an anesthesiologist? Time investment? 3 year IM+ 1 to 5 year fellowship?
That’s just my list. I hope you can make one for yourself and really figure out what is important to you now, and predict a little to the future.