Angiogram Examples - Telling Apart between LAD and LCx

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Cardsfellow1234

New Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2021
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Hello all,
I am a second year Cards fellow and in certain views I have realized I have a hard time telling LAD from Cx. I am sorry if this seems too intuitive to some, would love some validation/cross checking to make sure I am interpreting this correctly. I also hear Angiogerams are tested on the boards, but more so for my own practice I want to make sure I have these down straight, I hope this discussion also helps anyone else out there like me who struggles with 3 D spatial thinking :(
Would appreciate any input !!!!

Example 1. Below I think is an AP view - L = LAD, C =LCx. IS this labelled correct?
t33l-okCfBFurtRkszf0vZa-KJpQb9hX_rvdFI8YSTIRvu00cPmQetMH2GbMz7_XDQvAcJt1lQYQEJfayhErcZ5PZgZQ0sVzFJaODTiwuRYsh1yzTseNqMqF1rlD187IKBX-s_P3


Example 2: Below I think is a weird RAO Caudal View
A36NR5GsKeEPdCSq78EGtSQU7cMqNsQlvPw4VTvFGfNcLjb8dWDtahkiu0Z3iG11yIMvs1RBDLmM8q6ZLh2ABkJJobI0tqx7AAkPIe1om6saam15FjXo_sUQEB2yvXtvYCjO2Nu2


Example 3 Below is an AP View but I am really not sure if I have labelled the LAD and Cx correct here, hence the question marks...lol
mzYt0XV9yijTQ0aeLc0L6J35Z5TAsv8anKPWShSb4MsphUIiYVNk2L-VyZd3mBhUfSOSGelQbkHvf62fGAIlRzYpRgneZ4Jd91zeYDd_fZVHXwjjHevXZSwFcFpSGBy6982olymK


Example 4: Think below is again an RAO caudal view
VUMuZb1q4uGzH1a7NASzTBM3cru903dWqR9uhk1S7gMVa1zi3OK5JFl2oKQ8RnJ1DaIiZhk-_Xfk4WqHD6EcwQkJrJWJDhfypxDne8s52vt7oO4q6ry2EFR5GcQRPTY1CIovBFb4


Example 5: I think below is an RAO Cranial View - really not sure if this is labelled correctly
17V_2nhKmMrRzyqe2554gV6CSZs8jVVtWlYhgzPXUGU1IZb_0p_HqpjlV3t89AIpzMuB3tJFWp3mhU-az-_W3aSL36kMbLPPNF11GeIwBd-2MTRunLRUO_t7Ro-BtzTwApv7JtaF

Example 6: Really not sure if below is an RAO cranial or RAO caudal view - I dont see a diaphragmatic shadow clearly which would suggest a cranial angulation
f-XW9l2WJbYhwIZnPBBViLKvMwcuevp0uK8ny2lly1g8iPNI9Qy0ueXiwScIOBZFU_bZwChza8jirti_WNAVtEo_O2LH39-TynN1TrekVvPX3DJWjzmP52apUt5EZEy6d5w02gRJ

Members don't see this ad.
 
you clearly do not understand the views or what you are looking at/for. Cranial views should have a diaphragm shadow. The LAD usually goes vertically down on cranial views and LCx goes vertically down on caudal views. The septal perforators and the wrap around apex will give you hints it is the LAD. LCX goes along the AV groove, should see the curve of the main vessel while the OMs are usually larger branches shooting off. Pattern recognition is important. Knowing your views and landmarks is important. I think you should read/look at more pictures and understand it better. You should know LAO vs RAO and caudal vs cranial first before knowing which vessel is what.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
With due respect, I can always tell RAO vs LAO based on location of the spine/ catheter/ direction of ribs and apex of the heart and if there is diaphragmatic shadow I know its Cranial. But sometimes despite knowing these landmarks, vessels are not always going vertically down . Also sometimes the diaphragmatic shadow is not present or obscured in a cranial view. There was no need to take that condescending tone. Some of the images I posted above do not fall neatly under those categories
 
Last edited:
Members don't see this ad :)
Identifying septal perforators is key if there is ambiguity in your views.

For example, in example 3 and 4, you can see clear septal perforators marking that vessel as the LAD which you labeled as being possible circumflex. Example 5, that vessel looks more like a high diagonal than circumflex, you have the LAD marked correctly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
With due respect, I can always tell RAO vs LAO based on location of the spine/ catheter/ direction of ribs and apex of the heart and if there is diaphragmatic shadow I know its Cranial. But sometimes despite knowing these landmarks, vessels are not always going vertically down . Also sometimes the diaphragmatic shadow is not present or obscured in a cranial view. There was no need to take that condescending tone. Some of the images I posted above do not fall neatly under those categories
when you described example 6, i will either assume you mistyped caudal or you didnt see the large diaphragm shadow in the picture really suggesting cranial.
 
Top