• Set Yourself Up For Success Webinar

    October 6, 2021 at 2 PM Eastern/11 AM Pacific
    SDN and Osmosis are teaming up to help you get set up for success this school year! We'll be covering study tips, healthy habits, and meeting mentors.

    Register Now!

  • Funniest Story on the Job Contest Starts Now!

    Contest starts now and ends September 27th. Winner will receive a special user banner and $10 Amazon Gift card!

    JOIN NOW
  • Site Updates Coming Next Week

    Site updates are coming next week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Click the button below to learn more!

    LEARN MORE

Another Gen Chem topscore unclear

Dentista08

looking for a practice!
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Jul 25, 2008
228
0
101
Boston, MA
  1. Dental Student
  2. Dentist
I dont get it, if we are doing products-reactants shouldn't it be
(2(+283.3)- 2(-393.7)
Product CO produces so we reverse the sign?
Totally confused by this particular problem...
 

Attachments

  • P1050666.JPG
    P1050666.JPG
    41.6 KB · Views: 62

Tommymkea

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Sep 24, 2007
24
0
0
  1. Pre-Dental
You want to rearrange the two given equations so that they add up looking like the target one.

For the first one: 2*(C + O2 --> CO2) = 2C + 2(O2) --> 2(CO2)

For the second one (reverse and multiply by 2) you get:

2*(CO2 --> CO + 1/2(O2) = 2(CO2) --> 2CO + O2

Adding up the two equations gives you the target one. Same idea with the delta Hs. For the first one you multiplied everything by 2 (the delta H as well). For the second delta H you change its sign and multiply it by two just like you did in the second equation. Then you add the two up (just like to get to the taraget equation):

2(-393.7KJ) + (-(2(-283.3KJ))) = -220.8KJ

Hope it helps. Buona fortuna :luck:
 

Dentista08

looking for a practice!
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Jul 25, 2008
228
0
101
Boston, MA
  1. Dental Student
  2. Dentist
You want to rearrange the two given equations so that they add up looking like the target one.

For the first one: 2*(C + O2 --> CO2) = 2C + 2(O2) --> 2(CO2)

For the second one (reverse and multiply by 2) you get:

2*(CO2 --> CO + 1/2(O2) = 2(CO2) --> 2CO + O2

Adding up the two equations gives you the target one. Same idea with the delta Hs. For the first one you multiplied everything by 2 (the delta H as well). For the second delta H you change its sign and multiply it by two just like you did in the second equation. Then you add the two up (just like to get to the taraget equation):

2(-393.7KJ) + (-(2(-283.3KJ))) = -220.8KJ

Hope it helps. Buona fortuna :luck:
Grazie Mille!
I get that part now, but I guess I still don't understand why do you add the two together if its supposed to be products MINUS reactants. I'm tempted to subtract (2(+283.3)) from 2(-393.7)
 
About the Ads

zuma35

Full Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Sep 6, 2008
128
0
101
  1. Dental Student
You use products minus reactants when you are given the heats of formation for each individual product and reactant.
Here, you are given the delta H for two individual whole reactions. Hess's law is that if a reaction is done in steps, the total delta H is equal to the sum of the individual steps. That's why you add.
 

Dentista08

looking for a practice!
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Jul 25, 2008
228
0
101
Boston, MA
  1. Dental Student
  2. Dentist
You use products minus reactants when you are given the heats of formation for each individual product and reactant.
Here, you are given the delta H for two individual whole reactions. Hess's law is that if a reaction is done in steps, the total delta H is equal to the sum of the individual steps. That's why you add.
u made that very clear. thank you! I was confusing the 2
 
This thread is more than 12 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.