I am actually a general psychiatry resident who just accepted an offer to an interventional pain fellowship program. It is true that the road to this fellowship is more difficult as a psychiatrist, but it is not impossible. In fact, I have personal knowledge of three other psychiatrists who accepted spots last year (Brigham & Women's, Stanford, USC). None of these spots were designated "non-interventional" and the host institutions have little concern with the lack of procedure time psychiatry is alloted in general training (just as they are not worried about lack of MSK training in anesthesiology & lack of psychosocial treatment training in PM&R and anesthesiology). They believe the year is meant for training us in accordance with our own deficits.
I did negotiate some procedure time into my psych training as a R3 & will be an addiction fellow prior to joining the pain program. Further, I have engaged in a significant amount of research. But my main concentration was on being the best psychiatrist I can be.
The following are programs I interviewed for (either 2010-2011 or 2011-2012 year, in no particular order):
1. Stanford--Simply an amazing program. They don't consider themselves "interventional" but that may be simply because they want to stress that they treat in a multimodal atmosphere. From what I can see, their numbers are more than adequate. Dr. Mackey is simply wonderful. I have the impression that he is personally invested in continually improving the program and in recruiting the absolute best to his program. Stanford harbors a very academic-type environment and I think that there is considerable opportunity to pursue research there as a research fellow if you so desire. I think this program is well-deserving of its fine reputation.
2. MGH/Harvard - Again, a very academic environment with phenomenal leaders/teachers/peers. Their numbers are generally impressive and their track record of getting people the type of job they want after fellowship is remarkable. I enjoyed meeting with the program leadership and it appears fellows are quite happy. The downside for me was Boston, but that is strictly a personal opinion!
3. University of Colorado - This is historically an extremely interventional program where even stim/pump procedures are commonplace. It is divided into a PM&R track and Anesthesiology track, and how much crossover there is is largely up to the fellow. I personally know one of the past fellows and he loved this fellowship. It is a small program (1 in each track) and has limited psych/neuro representation and they have never taken a psych resident before.
4. USC - This program is run by a psychiatrist/pain physician. It is another small program. I think that I would have been happy with this program had I gone, but it is oriented toward those with more non-academic career aspirations. I'm not a huge fan of LA or LA traffic, but I think I'm in the minority! They took a psychiatrist for the 2010-2011 academic year.
5. University of Washington - You will hear all sorts of things about this program and how two fellows left recently. They were cleared by a third party of any wrongdoing & I met with both people that have been accused in these threads of wrongdoing--I actually thought both were pretty amazing individuals. This is where pain was born and though the program is recreating itself, it must be doing a great job. I thought the resources and experiences offered here were extensive and I got the impression that they expected (and got) the best out of people there. I loved Seattle too.
6. University of California, Davis -- I think this program was pretty amazing. It offers a broad range of clinical learning opportunities while still maintaining its ability to be called a very interventional program. I think the faculty is great & I felt they took a great deal of effort in trying to find if your professional goals could be met with by tailoring their program to you. I also like the fact that, like a few others on this list, this program has 6 fellows. They have revamped their consult structure and the fellows seem to think this has been a very positive thing. Dr. Fishman is boarded in psych, internal medicine, and pain medicine and he definitely brings all this expertise to the table--and he seems to run his program with a great deal of transparency. All faculty were approachable, all fellows were forthcoming with their thoughts about the program. Also, two liked it enough to stay on as faculty next year. This program is being awarded a "Center of Excellence" for pain treatment designation this year.
If I can be of further help, please let me know.