Are you sure you want to be a doctor?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
120k in New York, Boston, San Francisco, San Diego, Chicago, Washington D.C., and some other places will not take you far. However, 120k in some Midwest City like Madison, Iowa City, St. Louis, and others can take you further. With having said that, the life style you live determines how far a 120k salary can take you. What is wrong with just having one car (a used car that cost less then 15k), having a 3 bedroom and 2 bathroom house (if you have 3 children or less), having a town house, and not buy new things every week.

Look at this way:

(Per month)

House payment: $1,500
Health Insurance: for a family of 5 - it all depends on your policy
Car insurance: 500 dollars/3 months (for a small used car)
Groceries: 400/month
Utilities: 100/month
Bills: 150/month (cable, internet, etc)
School debt: 800/month

You could theoretically have monthly expenses in the range of $3,000 – 5,000. This is based on a family of 5.

On a 120k salary AFTER taxes are taken out will give you roughly a 10k monthly income.

That is about all you need for monthly basics. Everything else is just extra (unless I missed some essential basics in my list).

Ummm I think you may be a bit off since I spend more than that on utilities and bills per month and live in a 2 bedroom 1 bath apt in Richmond Va (not exactly expensive).

As has been said before, you are leaving a lot expenses out, like health insurance for you and your family, gas, OH SH1T fund, savings. When you get there you will be wishing your fought harder to maintain doctors' salaries.

I personally think the debt argument is a little weak. I understand investing 8 years and coming out 200K or more in the hole afterwards sucks. But using that as reasoning that doctors should make more money is weird. People take on that kind of debt for undergrad and while I understand that it's only 4 years, there's no guarantee at all that you're going to make anywhere near 120K.

Instead of thinking about it in absolutes (luxury car for doctor vs nice car for average Joe) think about the opportunity cost. As a doctor, you are losing many years of your life working 80h/week, you are losing those years in terms of earning potential and are spending up to 300K on loans and interest.

Economically you would think you since the oportunity cost is much higher than most jobs, you would get compensated accordingly.

Living in the Manhattan suburbs is a choice, not something you need to do. I will refuse to live in a big city like New York, San Fran, Boston, etc because of the outragous cost of living.

Let's say you get matched in NYC, what happens then?

Maybe I'm being an idealist here, but I say that's the what we agree to and must deal with as physicians.

This is the mentality that got our predicesors in trouble and started this whole problem with salary. If you just roll over and let them F you, they will be more than happy to. Without actually standing up for your hard work, you are going to see the continued decline. It is 10 times harder to get back your compensation than it is to lose it.

I don't think the drop in income is necessarily terrifying. It's only terrifying for people whose only goal in the profession is to make money. Yes, it offers a good lifestyle, but it's not the kind of field where you're gonna get super-rich. Some specialties will let you earn tons of money, but they will also require many more years of poorly paid training (various surgery subspecialties) and often involve a poor lifestyle. It's a trade-off.

Once you go to medical school and go through residency come back and talk. You dont have to be in medicine for the money to feel like you should get paid well for 10 years of training and crappy hours. It is easy to spout off idealistic crap when you are looking in from the outside.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
120k in New York, Boston, San Francisco, San Diego, Chicago, Washington D.C., and some other places will not take you far. However, 120k in some Midwest City like Madison, Iowa City, St. Louis, and others can take you further. With having said that, the life style you live determines how far a 120k salary can take you. What is wrong with just having one car (a used car that cost less then 15k), having a 3 bedroom and 2 bathroom house (if you have 3 children or less), having a town house, and not buy new things every week.

Look at this way:

(Per month)

House payment: $1,500
Health Insurance: for a family of 5 - it all depends on your policy
Car insurance: 500 dollars/3 months (for a small used car)
Groceries: 400/month
Utilities: 100/month
Bills: 150/month (cable, internet, etc)
School debt: 800/month

You could theoretically have monthly expenses in the range of $3,000 – 5,000. This is based on a family of 5.

On a 120k salary AFTER taxes are taken out will give you roughly a 10k monthly income.

That is about all you need for monthly basics. Everything else is just extra (unless I missed some essential basics in my list).

WOAH!! Please let me know if you know of a 3 br 2 bath home in NY where the payments are only $1500/month! And since a mortgage for 95k is about 700/month for 30 yrs at lets say 8%....I will likely have $240k in loans between my UG, Masters, and MD...so my school debt alone will be much more. And in this article the wife might also have some hefty loans too...
 
If their mortgage was tripled and they were paying significantly more taxes you'd see my point. Trust me, you won't be living like a rockstar on $120k if you have dependants and work in Manhattan. In NYC that's a very good salary for a young single professional whose just starting out, but kind of rough for someone married with kids and 15 years into a career such as the guy in the article.

I don't think anyone is saying you are going to live like a rockstar off of 120K a year. But to say you are living "modest" is a bit of a stretch. 120K (assuming loans are paid off) is good money. Period.

Then again, it depends what your definition of modest is. If you consider not owning several BMWs and a huge mansion "living modest" then sure, it's modest living I guess.
 
Ummm I think you may be a bit off since I spend more than that on utilities and bills per month and live in a 2 bedroom 1 bath apt in Richmond Va (not exactly expensive).

As has been said before, you are leaving a lot expenses out, like health insurance for you and your family, gas, OH SH1T fund, savings. When you get there you will be wishing your fought harder to maintain doctors' salaries.



Instead of thinking about it in absolutes (luxury car for doctor vs nice car for average Joe) think about the opportunity cost. As a doctor, you are losing many years of your life working 80h/week, you are losing those years in terms of earning potential and are spending up to 300K on loans and interest.

Economically you would think you since the oportunity cost is much higher than most jobs, you would get compensated accordingly.



Let's say you get matched in NYC, what happens then?



This is the mentality that got our predicesors in trouble and started this whole problem with salary. If you just roll over and let them F you, they will be more than happy to. Without actually standing up for your hard work, you are going to see the continued decline. It is 10 times harder to get back your compensation than it is to lose it.



Once you go to medical school and go through residency come back and talk. You dont have to be in medicine for the money to feel like you should get paid well for 10 years of training and crappy hours. It is easy to spout off idealistic crap when you are looking in from the outside.


It's a supply and demand issue. people just want to do this, even if the pay sucks. why do some plumbers make more than doctors? because they deal with **** all day. training cost is just one factor affecting demand for joining this profession. nothing in life is fair because it's fair. it's how it is because of economics, and sometimes it's fair because of chance
 
If you are not able to put any money into savings or retirement funds during your most productive years you should be terrified, regardless of your goals. Bad things happen all the time and if you have no parachute, you are SOL.

I'm confused by this post. Since when do doctors have to worry about job security? It's one of the most secure professions in the world.
 
This issue is just a symptom of the fractured nature of the profession. This argument will never be resolved because each of us has distinctly different political philosophies. My philosophy is that physicians, in a relatively free market economy, should be fairly compensated for the years of training they must endure, their special skill set, and additional risks inherent to the profession (risks to health and from lawsuits). Certainly, the average U.S. employee deserves to be paid more. One cannot, however, logically justify lowering physician pay to commensurate levels.

The more important issue here is one of unity. Physicians must find some way of uniting to reduce external pressures imposed upon the profession.
 
I'm confused by this post. Since when do doctors have to worry about job security? It's one of the most secure professions in the world.
I presume he refers to the million other things that could happen besides you getting fired - e.g. injury or accident in the family, severe illness, etc. Sure, most will have decent insurance policies to cover those things, but didn't State Farm only settle like 400 Katrina claims altogether? Even if you do get the coverage in case you become unable to work or your office burns down, it can take years to obtain the funds.
 
These threads always go the same way. Some article pops up about real life challenges facing real practicing physicians(with their names in the article), and some premeds jump in with the usual "no problem, I am not in it for the money". Let me garauntee you guys that even the most altruistic of you will be brought to your knees by a healthcare system heading in a direction where the doctor is the least significant component. Only at that point, where doctors are the laughing stock of the entire healthcare system, would you realize that, when you were giving away the profession in the name of altruism, you were actually not giving it away to the right people(the patients). So go ahead guys and hand your future profession over to politicians, insurance companies, HMOs and trial lawyers. I am sure they will take very good care of it.
 
Real estate in San Jose, Ca.
http://yahoo.idx.prucalforhomes.com...&sortacdc=asc&miles=-1&searchgeo=San+Jose,+CA

3bed 2 bath houses; 1000 sq feet - 1300 sq feet range in price from 600k-800k easily

That is just a modest house.

5 bedroom houses with are all well over a million.

As a doctor, after spending 10 years in school and giong 250k in debt don't you expect just a little compensation? You are caring for other people trying to help the ill yet you get buttrammed by insurance companies and lawyers... is that fair?
 
The more important issue here is one of unity. Physicians must find some way of uniting to reduce external pressures imposed upon the profession.
I think the majority would agree that the biggest factor is malpractice. As long as the mentality and the legal system continue to allow for frivolous lawsuits and for outrageous compensation for the smallest things, nothing is going to be resolved. If you just increase the compensation, it will just drive the cost of healthcare even higher up and so many people already can't afford it.

A legal system that's less tolerant of BS is one of the main reasons why Canadian malpractice insurance is 10x lower than in the US. The government contributes to malpractice insurance and it won't let someone get away with suing their doctor for a million dollars because they pinched their finger on the gurney or something and had a bruise.
 
I hate to do this but here's a link that you guys can refer to and get an idea about recent figures for doctors' salaries

http://www.allied-physicians.com/salary_surveys/physician-salaries.htm

Here we go again. This survey has been questioned and discredited on this and other boards more times than I can count. See dutchman's point above. (The max is particularly misleading because that is pretty much money nobody sees anything close to anymore -- surveys without a max tend to be more honest because they aren't trying to puff things up).
 
Members don't see this ad :)
I'm confused by this post. Since when do doctors have to worry about job security? It's one of the most secure professions in the world.

Savings is not just about protecting for job security. Illness, disability, divorce, natural disaster (fires, floods) all can put you in the poorhouse if you are living from paycheck to paycheck with nothing in the bank. You cannot assume things will always be rosy so no need to plan.
 
Here we go again. This survey has been questioned and discredited on this and other boards more times than I can count. See dutchman's point above. (The max is particularly misleading because that is pretty much money nobody sees anything close to anymore -- surveys without a max tend to be more honest because they aren't trying to puff things up).
Any other data available?

I can show you the following (comparison of US/Canadian), but I wonder if anything more comprehensive is available - this was posted on another forum. I also have the official data for Canadian physician earnings, but only for 2001-2002, and things have changed since, especially in my province because the cost of living close to doubled in some areas - but I can post that if anyone's interested.









A short article claims that malpractice insurance in the USA eats up much of the difference in salaries between Canada and USA...

http://www.nationalreviewofmedicine....tice01_16.html

Canadian MD earnings inch upward

NRM survey shows practice revenue remains healthy


Gross and net earnings rose in 2005
Gross Net
Dermatologists $360,000 $240,000
Internists $310,000 $200,000
Ob/gyns $320,000 $195,000
Pediatricians $250,000 $160,000
Psychiatrists $190.000 $160.000
GPs $260,000 $155,000

"Things seemed pretty steady to me, money-wise" says a Montreal GP. Her view is in keeping with the majority of respondents in NRM's latest Practice Management Survey, which revealed that most doctors' earnings held steady in 2005. But when you closely look at the numbers, there's actually much to happy about. For instance, physicians were more likely to see a wage increase and less likely see their pay decline last year compared the year before.

Overall, 41%* of Canadian doctors said their gross practice revenue increased during last year. This is up from 33% in 2004. Also, fewer doctors complained of a drop in gross revenue in last year (14%) compared to the previous year (21%).

The past year's numbers were similarly pleasant for Canadian MDs after practice expenses. In 2005, 34% reported a higher take-home pay, compared to 27% in 2004. After taxes too, MDs were farther ahead of the game in 2005 than 2004; in 2005 18% of doctors reported a drop in net income compared to 28% in 2004.

NRM Practice Management Survey Results 2006
Gross practice revenue for GP/FPs and selected specialties

click here for pdf chart

DOLLARS & CENTS
Primary care physicians had a pretty good year in 2006. An equal number of respondents (43%) earned a higher practice revenue compared to the previous year; only 13% had a lower gross income. After-tax earnings weren't quite so good for Canada's GPs. While 34% saw their net salary rise, 51% saw it hold steady, and for 18% of respondents, after-tax revenue was down in 2005.

According to the survey, 2005 saw a jump in the number of physicians in the top-tier income bracket of $300,000 or higher. All-in-all 27% of respondents grossed more than $300,000 in 2005 — that's an eight percent jump from the previous year. Also, in 2005, 37% of respondents earned a gross income between of $200,000-$300,000 — a 1% gain from last year's survey. Not surprisingly, a higher proportion of specialists (31%) surpassed the 300K mark than GPs (20%). Nine percent of GPs found themselves in the lowest MD income bracket — less than $100,000. Surprisingly, an even greater percentage of specialist respondents (10%) reported earning less than 100K.

GRASS NOT GREENER
Things haven't been so rosy of late for doctors south of the border. A survey published in Medical Economics found that net earnings for both the average primary care doctor and the average specialist remained unchanged over a one-year — and when inflation was added to the picture, their wages actually declined. Canadian doctors, despite the problems with our system, might want to thank their lucky stars that the tort environment here is nowhere near as poisonous as it is in the United States. In fact, extortionate American malpractice insurance premiums — which shot up 18% in a year — were the biggest factor in holding back growth in US doctor compensation.
US MDs gross more, net less
Gross Net*
Dermatologists $560,000 $282,000
Ob/gyns $569,300 $215,000
Pediatricians $380,000 $147,900
Internists $350,000 $150,000
GPs/FPs $320,900 $134,000
(*2004 median income, after tax-deductible expenses, but before income taxes, in US funds. Source: Medical Economics)
 
US physicians make MORE than ANY other physicians in the world. Come on. Yes, we will pick up the tab. But we make more--- by far. Yes, it takes longer. But again, we make more. Its a trade off. And I bet if you found the total earnings... the area under the curve, we'd come out ahead.
I heard that physicians in Hong Kong earn more than physicians in USA. They only have an MBBS and most work office hours.

Largely, I agree with you. Comfort, not wealth, is what we will have.
Comfort... not in the working environment and not in the number of hours. But comfort knowing that no matter how bad the economy gets you will still have a job.

But when I see an article like this, it just makes my skin crawl. People complaining about not being rich. People complaining about being comfortable in the upper middle class.
There is a comparison going on with other job areas. I think if there weren't tradespeople that earn $150k a year, or salespeople that earn $175k a year then there won't be as much complaining. People have the idea that when they get into med school they are set in life. But with busting your ass in undergrad, plus 4 years of medical school and $250,000 debt, 4-6 years of residency at peanut pay, and ultimately 60 hours a week for meager return... the investment doesn't look so fulfilling for some.
 
...
On a 120k salary AFTER taxes are taken out will give you roughly a 10k monthly income.

That is about all you need for monthly basics. Everything else is just extra (unless I missed some essential basics in my list).

120k AFTER taxes...etc is around 200k BEFORE tax. HUGE difference compared to 120K before tax.

And your utility bills..etc seem off.
 
The average wage earner in the US has borrowed nothing -- no student loans at all. Someone who goes to an expensive college is not going to be the average. And the typical med school grad has borrowed for BOTH college and med school -- putting him way above the average, who again is debt-free. Which is why comparing to the average is not so useful. And the decade of time difference is the big ticket item.

I don't necessarilly think their ought to be a quid pro quo for the time and expense you incur getting to be a physician. It just is frustrating when people point to some national average, of people they probably have never met, and say I'm rich compared to him/her. It's silly. Rich is based on an individual's buying power. If you have to take on a second job, send your spouse out to work, and downgrade things, in order to pay your mortgage etc, you aren't living the high life. That's all. It's comfortable, not rich. Which is fine. But people need to adjust their senses of reality. And some need to adjust their notions of how much money is a lot because once you get to $120k you will see that you can live a certain lifestyle but it's nothing close to what you would have imagined when you were in undergrad, particularly if you have decent expenses.

First off, I wasn't pointing to a national average. I was simply pointing out the fact that because you take on a huge amount of debt, that doesn't mean that you should automatically be compensated for it. It's a choice you make and though I'm not thrilled about it, it's the fact of the matter.

Secondly, I grew up with 2 internist parents and am completely aware that we were by no means rich. That being said, we were definitely more than comfortable and if I can even achieve that lifestyle when I'm eventually a physician with a family, I feel like it will be more than enough.

I'm simply pointing out that these doctors that are griping about not being able to afford their luxury cars or summer homes are not going to get a lot of sympathy. We didn't have that kind of stuff growing up and I really don't think I'm worse off because of it. My parents had to pick and choose where they put their money so we did do things like take vacations, but didn't have expensive cars. I feel like that's life!
 
120k AFTER taxes...etc is around 200k BEFORE tax.

It kills me to see this perpetuated. This is not an accurate statistic for anyone who has done a remote amount of financial planning. Is interest on your loans deductible? Yes. Is your mortgage deductible? Yes. And when you pass the cap on your student loans being deductible, you refinance your house so that it continues to be through the mortgage interest deduction. Those two deductions will likely take people below a 25% tax bracket on their gross, until you really get to the later stages of your mortgage. If you aren't dying to fund Halliburton, you can take home 150 when you are bringing in 200.
 
It kills me to see this perpetuated. This is not an accurate statistic for anyone who has done a remote amount of financial planning. Is interest on your loans deductible? Yes. Is your mortgage deductible? Yes. And when you pass the cap on your student loans being deductible, you refinance your house so that it continues to be through the mortgage interest deduction. Those two deductions will likely take people below a 25% tax bracket on their gross, until you really get to the later stages of your mortgage. If you aren't dying to fund Halliburton, you can take home 150 when you are bringing in 200.

how about social security? premium for malpractice insurance? :confused:
 
"I have increased stress, high blood pressure," he says. He's so wound up by the time he gets home from the office that his wife won't talk to him for an hour afterward. He's watched a couple of physician friends undergo open-heart surgery. Still, he's reluctant. His income dropped 25 percent in one recent year."

"Doctors have lost ground. Insurance companies have ganged up on them. "I have anxiety about staying in business," says an internist who's put his own money toward payroll. The trouble isn't just financial. Perks, privileges, esteem (self-esteem too) have all been hit. Many physicians work longer hours. And now, it seems, all kinds of people -- including clerks! -- are telling them what to do."

"many American doctors are unhappy with the quality of their professional lives." The literature on this reads like the intake form at a depression clinic: "increasing marginalization," "discontent," "confused," "angry," "insulted."

"Lately, lots of doctors have to pick up work on the side. Horowitz works as a medical consultant at Juilliard. One doctor got involved with a dot-com for a few years -- which was the last time he flew business-class. Some physicians augment their incomes by selling herbs, food supplements, cosmetics, even household cleaners in their offices. Schayes sells vitamins. "I buy wholesale and sell retail," he says. "It was kind of embarrassing at first. But at the end of the year it makes a big difference." Last year, Schayes, an M.D. approaching the height of his earning power, earned about $120,000 -- which doesn't come close to buying what people once thought of as the M.D. lifestyle. Soon, Schayes figures, his wife will have to go back to work. She hasn't worked in five years while the kids grow up. "She doesn't want to, but I'm making her," says Schayes. "Besides, she's a lawyer. Her earning potential is greater than mine."

"As Fox explains, "I don't have any clout." Insurance companies have clout, institutions have clout, even patients have some. And so, just like any disgruntled worker, doctors -- doctors! -- are turning to unions."

"The insurance industry has created a slave workforce out of the doctor," says Moshe Rubin, a gastroenterologist at Columbia."

http://nymag.com/nymetro/health/features/5044/

This is today, just imagine what it will look like ten years from now:scared: .


--
 
First off, I wasn't pointing to a national average. I was simply pointing out the fact that because you take on a huge amount of debt, that doesn't mean that you should automatically be compensated for it. It's a choice you make and though I'm not thrilled about it, it's the fact of the matter.
And let's get real here. I've worked a few blue collar jobs and have thus had a first-hand view of what it's like. For example, there was this low-tech manufacturing plant I worked at (dirt packing, basically). The guys start at $11 an hour, progress to $12 after 3 months. 80% of the hires don't make the 3-month benchmark. The work involves being there at 7 AM with dirt and dust in the air, you spend the 8 hour-day packing dirt into boxes and jugs (dirt is being spat out by machinery), sealing these boxes/screwing lids on those jugs. By 3 PM, you are likely to have lifted 200,000 lbs' worth of boxes. You've spent 8 hours in a dusty overheated plant surrounded by machinery banging at 90-110 decibels - all on your feet, by the way. You can't stop and take a break for a few minutes, because this is the assembly line and the machinery will break if the line is not kept clear. Then you come home, blow your nose, everything comes out black. First off, try going to school after you've had a day like that - and some of these guys had kids and had to work ANOTHER job on the weekend.

And let's see how much you are making - about $1800 a month, $22,000 a year. Yeah, you got no student loans, you lucky bastard! :thumbup: Let's see how much you will have made by age 65 (but we all know you won't retire then) - $880,000!

Let's take a whiny NY doctor next. So you'll have paid $300K in loans/interest over your career of, say, 40 years. During this time, you will have made a paltry $120K a year. Let's see how much that adds up to - $4,800,000. Let's subtract the $300K you paid in loans - $4.5 million. 5 times what the other guy made!


Excuse me, my heart is bleeding! Any underpaid thoracic surgeons around here or did they all faint from hunger on the way to work today?
 
so all those add up to around 125k in deductable? :confused:

how about social security? premium for malpractice insurance?

Again, you miss the concept. Your federal tax-rate drops to another 5% once you get your income below ~155.

Your OASDI tax of 6% will not account for the tax that you propose, and a salary of 200k for a specialty should include malpractice.

But we can stick with your numbers for dramatic effect if you like. They just aren't realistic if you have a good cpa.
 
And let's get real here. I've worked a few blue collar jobs and have thus had a first-hand view of what it's like. For example, there was this low-tech manufacturing plant I worked at (dirt packing, basically). The guys start at $11 an hour, progress to $12 after 3 months. 80% of the hires don't make the 3-month benchmark. The work involves being there at 7 AM with dirt and dust in the air, you spend the 8 hour-day packing dirt into boxes and jugs (dirt is being spat out by machinery), sealing these boxes/screwing lids on those jugs. By 3 PM, you are likely to have lifted 200,000 lbs' worth of boxes. You've spent 8 hours in a dusty overheated plant surrounded by machinery banging at 90-110 decibels - all on your feet, by the way. You can't stop and take a break for a few minutes, because this is the assembly line and the machinery will break if the line is not kept clear. Then you come home, blow your nose, everything comes out black. First off, try going to school after you've had a day like that - and some of these guys had kids and had to work ANOTHER job on the weekend.

And let's see how much you are making - about $1800 a month, $22,000 a year. Yeah, you got no student loans, you lucky bastard! :thumbup: Let's see how much you will have made by age 65 (but we all know you won't retire then) - $880,000!

Let's take a whiny NY doctor next. So you'll have paid $300K in loans/interest over your career of, say, 40 years. During this time, you will have made a paltry $120K a year. Let's see how much that adds up to - $4,800,000. Let's subtract the $300K you paid in loans - $4.5 million. 5 times what the other guy made!


Excuse me, my heart is bleeding! Any underpaid thoracic surgeons around here or did they all faint from hunger on the way to work today?

I also made the equivalent of $55k a year as a certified welder. Construction is comparable too, with a bigger company, once you are vested. If you count that at 8 years, assume it's equal to what a resident makes (it isn't), and don't have to pay student loans (500K with interest for undergrad and med is about what I am going to be looking at), it's not so bleeding heart to assume that a skilled blue-collar worker will be doing better than a physician (particularly a gp) until the tortoise overtakes the hare later in life.
 
Again, you miss the concept. Your federal tax-rate drops to another 5% once you get your income below ~155.

Your OASDI tax of 6% will not account for the tax that you propose, and a salary of 200k for a specialty should include malpractice.

But we can stick with your numbers for dramatic effect if you like. They just aren't realistic if you have a good cpa.

point of my original post is that 120k before and after tax is quite different.

i'm not a business/accounting major and never really looked at all the tax stuff. just fill in those blanks on those tax softwares... :D
 
point of my original post is that 120k before and after tax is quite different.

i'm not a business/accounting major and never really bothered to look at all the tax stuff. just fill in those blanks on those tax softwares... :D

I 100% appreciate that, and concede that the 120k before and after taxes is a big deal. I didn't mean to browbeat you either, but most people have a distorted picture of what is realistic and what isn't. They either assume they are going to be doctors and make 300k (they won't) or that they will lose 1/2 their salary in taxes (they won't). For those that are going into primary care, the financial implications are often very different from expectations (at both extremes).
 
I 100% appreciate that, and concede that the 120k before and after taxes is a big deal. I didn't mean to browbeat you either, but most people have a distorted picture of what is realistic and what isn't. They either assume they are going to be doctors and make 300k (they won't) or that they will lose 1/2 their salary in taxes (they won't). For those that are going into primary care, the financial implications are often very different from expectations (at both extremes).

I should look more into taxes... the 200k was really just there for the dramatic effect as you said. :D

In the end, people with 200k income really on pays around 45k "pure" income tax.

I'm pretty sure the dude in the article was making $120k before taxes.

I understand that, but my post was in response to dewdrinker23 who performed his/her analysis based on 120k after taxes.
 
Secondly, I grew up with 2 internist parents and am completely aware that we were by no means rich. That being said, we were definitely more than comfortable and if I can even achieve that lifestyle when I'm eventually a physician with a family, I feel like it will be more than enough.

The key word in your post is 2. The article describes a sole wageearner, and many of us will find ourselves in that position. So divide your family lifestyle in half and you will see what I'm talking about.
 
Any other data available?

It's getting somewhat dated, but since incomes since then have been going down, not up, you can probably get a realistic sense of salaries from a table run in JAMA (a relatively reputable source) a few years back. http://www.medfriends.org/specialty_hours_worked.htm Bear in mind that lots of people earn less than those averages, particularly when starting out.

Someone posted recent numbers from the Burea of Labor and Statistics on the allo board earlier in the year which were pretty close to these figures as well.
 
These threads always go the same way. Some article pops up about real life challenges facing real practicing physicians(with their names in the article), and some premeds jump in with the usual "no problem, I am not in it for the money". Let me garauntee you guys that even the most altruistic of you will be brought to your knees by a healthcare system heading in a direction where the doctor is the least significant component. Only at that point, where doctors are the laughing stock of the entire healthcare system, would you realize that, when you were giving away the profession in the name of altruism, you were actually not giving it away to the right people(the patients). So go ahead guys and hand your future profession over to politicians, insurance companies, HMOs and trial lawyers. I am sure they will take very good care of it.

It's useless to try to explain this to premeds, it only makes them stronger...
 
It all depends on the lifestyle you choose.

Try complaining about that 120K salary to the paramedic bringing in your patient making 14 dollars an hour or to most of America. Like I said, it depends on the lifestyle you want to live. A single doctor making 120K living in a single bedroom apt is much better off than the family man with a wife demanding a mansion. That doctor is in debt up to his eyeballs on top of his student loans, while the single doctor in the apartment just has to pay off his student loans.
 
It all depends on the lifestyle you choose.

Try complaining about that 120K salary to the paramedic bringing in your patient making 14 dollars an hour or to most of America. Like I said, it depends on the lifestyle you want to live. A single doctor making 120K living in a single bedroom apt is much better off than the family man with a wife demanding a mansion. That doctor is in debt up to his eyeballs on top of his student loans, while the single doctor in the apartment just has to pay off his student loans.

not if the wife is ballin' :D
 
I 100% appreciate that, and concede that the 120k before and after taxes is a big deal. I didn't mean to browbeat you either, but most people have a distorted picture of what is realistic and what isn't. They either assume they are going to be doctors and make 300k (they won't) or that they will lose 1/2 their salary in taxes (they won't). For those that are going into primary care, the financial implications are often very different from expectations (at both extremes).

Yes, anyone who makes 120K will lose about 1/2 their salary to taxes. National Income tax (take about 1/3 of it) and state income taxes, and the rest will go to sales taxes, property taxes (if you own), taxes on investments, social security and unemployment taxes (which you pay half of and your employer pays the other half, and if you're self employed you get hit even harder). I heard a statistic that the average person works from January until June just to pay off all their taxes.
 
A single doctor making 120K living in a single bedroom apt is much better off than the family man with a wife demanding a mansion.

I agree with your notion but $120k and mansion really don't belong in the same sentence. You cannot buy a one bedroom condo in some cities for less than twice that. Even in the cheaper parts of the country $120k before taxes won't be enough income to service the mortgage on a bona fide mansion, even if you have no other expenses.
 
It all depends on the lifestyle you choose.

Try complaining about that 120K salary to the paramedic bringing in your patient making 14 dollars an hour or to most of America. Like I said, it depends on the lifestyle you want to live. A single doctor making 120K living in a single bedroom apt is much better off than the family man with a wife demanding a mansion. That doctor is in debt up to his eyeballs on top of his student loans, while the single doctor in the apartment just has to pay off his student loans.

This is true, but who are you (or anyone else) to tell me (proverbially) what kind of lifestyle is or isn't "too much?" If making 120K/yr is "enough" after spending 15 years post high school and $180K of borrowed money to earn your degree, then that's fine. But nobody has the right to tell me that wanting a big house and nice cars is "wrong." If anything, it should absolutely be validated by the 80 hour work weeks over 3-7 years while being payed 30-40K (which is about average for this country for anyone), giving up of 15 years of working/lost income, and extremely high level of education. That's how and why market economies work.
 
Yes, anyone who makes 120K will lose about 1/2 their salary to taxes. National Income tax (take about 1/3 of it) and state income taxes, and the rest will go to sales taxes, property taxes (if you own), taxes on investments, social security and unemployment taxes (which you pay half of and your employer pays the other half, and if you're self employed you get hit even harder). I heard a statistic that the average person works from January until June just to pay off all their taxes.

That's a cute statistic, if you are an average person. I should hope that if you are smart enough to get into med school, you are smart enough to cover your a$$. Maybe even slightly-above-average on the smartliness. Just maybe. FYI I have never paid more than 20% in taxes.

And sales tax? Really? Are going to proactively deduct that from our salary before we spend the money so we get a more dramatic figure?
 
I agree with you, but to get to your notion, I think a lot of people on this thread need to realize that a $120k salary often doesn't even get you that big house and nice cars.

Probably won't even get you one or the other.
 
The key word in your post is 2. The article describes a sole wageearner, and many of us will find ourselves in that position. So divide your family lifestyle in half and you will see what I'm talking about.

Well that's my point...if you want this luxurious lifestyle and you're the sole wage earner, you have to make some decisions about what's important to you and your family.

And not that it matters as it's one anecdote, but my mom doesn't make much at all as she works super part-time, so essentially we're a 1.5 earning househoud.
 
FYI I have never paid more than 20% in taxes.

I think 50% is an exaggeration but 20% isn't going to be close to what doctors pay either. Our system is not a flat tax system, so people who earn more pay higher rates. Additionally the amount of taxes you pay depends significantly on what state you live in. 5+% taxes at the state level are not uncommon. And if you live in certain cities, there are also city/municipal taxes. And social security/unemployment gets taken out of your paycheck on top of your taxes. Expect to take a big pay haircut when you start getting physician paychecks.
 
I think pre-meds should be required to take a few econ courses - some of the posts on this thread are ridiculous! You are worth something! Your time is worth something! Time value of money! Opportunity Cost! I'm sorry but the paramedic maybe choose not to go to college, to bust their ass in get good grades, to spend a year applying to med school, etc. The time we spend investing in ourselves so that we can become competent physicians deserves compentsation. That paramedic started working right out of high school or sometimes after college. We had zero income for 8 + years while investing in our own human capital. If there is no return to that human capital investment eventually no one is going to want to be a physician. Don't sell yourselves short - you are worth something - the path to become a doctor isn't an easy one and the salary should reflect that.
 
I agree with Jochi on this one, about crappy jobs for crappy pay. The job I work now pays me $6.50/hour. I work mostly with immigrants who often work two or three jobs. Many of them have wives and children in other countries; they are trying to save up money to bring them to the US, but its hard when you can barely support yourself. They are often late to work because their other jobs had them working late, they are always exhausted, and they never complain. They don't speak English, but they try their hardest to learn. I've come to respect these people very much; they are far stronger people than I will ever be.

If you're in it for the money, that's nice. I'm not, so I'm not at all worried. If I can live comforatbly, that's all I want. Most of my friends struggle to pay the bills and live paycheck to paycheck. All I want is to have the security to not live like that.
 
I think 50% is an exaggeration but 20% isn't going to be close to what doctors pay either. Our system is not a flat tax system, so people who earn more pay higher rates. Additionally the amount of taxes you pay depends significantly on what state you live in. 5+% taxes at the state level are not uncommon. And if you live in certain cities, there are also city/municipal taxes. And social security/unemployment gets taken out of your paycheck on top of your taxes. Expect to take a big pay haircut when you start getting physician paychecks.

I do expect to bend over for Uncle Sam, assuredly. But I am currently in the highest tax bracket in California. I expect that 20% to swell, but I don't think 25-30% is unreasonable for a physician's salary. If it is, I am in the queue for an audit.
 
I think pre-meds should be required to take a few econ courses - some of the posts on this thread are ridiculous! You are worth something! Your time is worth something! Time value of money! Opportunity Cost! I'm sorry but the paramedic maybe choose not to go to college, to bust their ass in get good grades, to spend a year applying to med school, etc. The time we spend investing in ourselves so that we can become competent physicians deserves compentsation. That paramedic started working right out of high school or sometimes after college. We had zero income for 8 + years while investing in our own human capital. If there is no return to that human capital investment eventually no one is going to want to be a physician. Don't sell yourselves short - you are worth something - the path to become a doctor isn't an easy one and the salary should reflect that.

A significant portion of my graduating class was unable to attend college for financial reasons. It's usually not a choice...just a thought.
 
A significan portion of my graduating class was unable to attend college for financial reasons. Its usually not a choice...just a thought.


Anyone that performs well in high school can get merit money to attend college for free and many schools have very generous need based packages. Save that, there is no reason someone cannnot swing junior college for 2 years and then their state school for the last two years. Federal loans have low interest rates and your expected return post college makes this kind of debt doable. If you want to go to college you can, there is money out there. I don't deny that some people aren't aware of these opportunities and I wish that there was better advising for these students at an early age. But where there is a will there is a way. You always have a choice - some choices just require a bit more hard work and dedication.
 
Anyone that performs well in high school can get merit money to attend college for free and many schools have very generous need based packages. Save that, there is no reason someone cannnot swing junior college for 2 years and then their state school for the last two years. Federal loans have low interest rates and your expected return post college makes this kind of debt doable. If you want to go to college you can, there is money out there. I don't deny that some people aren't aware of these opportunities and I wish that there was better advising for these students at an early age. But where there is a will there is a way. You always have a choice - some choices just require a bit more hard work and dedication.

I hate to be that person who won't stop arguing, but my boyfriend had to stop going to community college because he couldn't afford it. There are a lot of people who have to go right from high school to a full-time job. A lot of people also don't do well in high school because they go right from school to work, then home to bed to repeat it the next day. I studied on average 5 hours a night during high school, and I still didn't get very many merit scholarships; I can't imagine having to work as well. The money doesn't go to poor white farm kids. It goes to poor black inner city kids. I hate to say it that way, but its true.
 
That's a cute statistic, if you are an average person. I should hope that if you are smart enough to get into med school, you are smart enough to cover your a$$. Maybe even slightly-above-average on the smartliness. Just maybe. FYI I have never paid more than 20% in taxes.

And sales tax? Really? Are going to proactively deduct that from our salary before we spend the money so we get a more dramatic figure?

It completely depends how you earn your money. If you own your own practice, then you can work with your cash flow and business structure to protect yourself from taxes. If you're an attending at XYZ Hospital who pays you a paycheck, then you're hands are pretty much tied. Oh, and 90% of med students and physicians are completely and totally clueless when it comes to financial matters, so I would expect that even these very smart people who are in medical school will NOT be "smart enough to cover [their] a$$."

And yes, sales tax is a tax that must be paid. It counts. Just like we'll count luxury tax if you go out and buy a boat.

Oh, and calling my statistics "cute"? Way to stay classy...
 
Top