Of course its preferred to have a DO LOR. I never disputed that. I only said that a physician LOR does NOT have to be from a DO. ( Your chances are better with one) I would venture to guess that there are various others here who never got a DO letter either. You have to remember that in some parts of the country, Osteopathy is sparse. I attribute my "exception" to my previous medical experience. My LOR was from somebody that knew me over a period of years and could comment well on my potential to become a good physician. For me personally, a DO LOR was never an issue on my application. I applied to various DO programs and was accepted by every one that I applied to. I attended a couple of lectures with DO's during undergrad and sought advice from faculty that work with DO's, but thats it.
Irish: I'm surprised your not watching ND on TV right now. Washington State was handling them in the first half. How's Biochem and Histo/Embryo coming along? To answer your question: I chose Osteopathy for various reasons. Too many to list here. My personality, beliefs about medicine, life experiences, etc. lend more toward Osteopathy. Probably the same reasons you chose AZCOM. It wasn't hard.
I am in AZCOM Class of 2007.