Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="LukeWhite" data-source="post: 1311587" data-attributes="member: 17626"><p>As far as quality of reviews go, they are what they are. You certainly won't have better luck in a traditional system simply because something's 10 rather 20 on USNews rankings or because School X turns out a dozen dermatologists a year. I won't dispute that some people are probably unpleasantly surprised, but I have a hard time believing that those who are motivated and smart about their choices end up suffering from the setup. The stats look good to me; the anecdotes so far haven't been that specific or convincing.</p></blockquote><p></p>

This thread is more than 16 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
This thread is locked.