Being a leader

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Fakesmile

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2008
Messages
444
Reaction score
0
These days, it seems that almost everyone is described as being a leader. But what exactly does it mean to be a leader? Having a leadership position? Giving directions to others? I feel that the increasingly common usage of the word is obscuring the true meaning of the word. What do you all think?
 
I agree completely in that the meaning of the word is being continually diluted by its overuse. Who knows, I may even be contributing to its dilution myself.

I tend to consider leadership to be a position in which others look to you for guidance in some substantive way. If the decisions you make actually effect other people's behavior and the courses of action you decide upon are followed, then I would say you are a leader.

Reaching a definition of the word is only half the battle, however. Leaders can generally be recognized by their demeanor and the way in which they interact with others, even in everyday setting in which no one person is identified as "the leader." The aura of authority just follows some people around, no matter how they identify themselves. On the flip side, I'd bet many people consider themselves to be leaders even though no one else would ever consider them to be one.
 
I think more importantly is that you did something with your leadership.
Let's say your leader of the XYZ premed club where I hosted doctors to talk about premed experiences. That's not good enough nowadays. You need stuff like I designed a new mentoring program for freshmen to explore medicine, etc...
 
These days, it seems that almost everyone is described as being a leader. But what exactly does it mean to be a leader? Having a leadership position? Giving directions to others? I feel that the increasingly common usage of the word is obscuring the true meaning of the word. What do you all think?

I think "Leadership" can be defined simply as having others follow you. In order for that to last, however, there are typically things you must do -- serve them, be responsible for them, offer them something as a "leader," etc. In other words, you are a leader when people are following you in some sense of the word; however, people don't tend to follow long if you're not leading them some place of value.

Leadership can probably also be defined in terms of what it is not:

  • A Position (while one effective in a "leadership position" may be a leader, someone can also gain a "position of leadership" but end up w/ no followers if a poor leader)
  • Power (good leaders have influence but they typically don't lord power over people)
I think good leaders tend to be servant-leaders, tending to the needs of those they are leading before tending to their own. Good leaders are typically empathetic, good listeners, strong communicators, etc. Excellent leaders are sensitive to the needs of their followers as well as coleaders. Outstanding leaders realize leadership is a role, not a position. All leaders must understand that they are always responsible to someone (whether that's the people they are leading or someone supervising and leading them).

I think the key in terms of admissions is that some positions allow you to shine as a leader; however, people who are not effective leaders will fail if given these positions of leadership. Being President of the Pre-Med Club at my school does not make me a leader. The fact that I have mobilized pre-meds in the community to make a difference in the community's health makes me a leader at that time. There seems to be a lot of confusion about what leadership really is and it's so easy for people to think of it as a position but that's not what it is at all. It's a set of actions and behaviors that are reciprocated by others. "Leadership experience" is simply a way of developing those qualities. You are not a leader simply b/c you hold some officer position.
 
Last edited:
If you are exceptionally good at something, and others observe you and want to follow you or your way of doing things because they think it will bring them success; then you are a leader.
 
If you are exceptionally good at something, and others observe you and want to follow you or your way of doing things because they think it will bring them success; then you are a leader.

This, except I would change "Exceptionally good at something" to "Exceptionally good at and shows a relentless zeal for something." Zeal is an important characteristic that makes you a leader. For example, I'm not the best at managing hospital volunteers and I'm certainly not the best at teaching students because those things don't fully captivate my interest. BUT, if you give me a room full of people talking about computers, I get super excited and I generally dominate the conversation, not to the disapproval of others, but to the respect of them. They want me to continue talking because they value the information I know in the sense that it increases their own abilities and knowledge.

Now, if you find someone who can, in earnest, put on a display of enthusiasm for the littlest thing, and get others excited about it, and then be effective enough to follow-through with your plans, then you've found yourself a world class leader.
 
If you are exceptionally good at something, and others observe you and want to follow you or your way of doing things because they think it will bring them success; then you are a leader.

I am no expert certainly but I would describe that person as a role model. A good trait but may or may not be a leader.

I think a leader evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of their team and establishes a plan toward reaching a goal. That is pretty general but there are so many different kinds of leaders and teams and I'm not sure whether you referencing health care specifically or thinking more broadly.
 
compared with the rest of the posters on this thread, I have the most posts on SDN.

Thus, I am a leader.
 
Top