- Joined
- Feb 26, 2010
- Messages
- 412
- Reaction score
- 1
Hi everyone!
So basically I have been doing clinical research for about a year now testing firefighters maximum oxygen consumption levels correlating it to cardiovascular disease. I believe this is classified as clinical research because I don't perform any 'bench' work per se. The project is coming to a close as our manuscript is almost written and now I have two options.
I can either continue this research next fall by maybe starting up another project under the same PI relating to the first project or pursue bench research in the microbiology department. The kicker is that I do not know how adcoms view clinical vs bench research and whether one "counts more" towards actual research that they are looking for. I highly enjoy the research I do now and especially like all of the people I work with so that is a major motivation. I also just got accepted to the SIP at the NIH for this summer and figured that might fulfill my empty bench research hole.
So basically, my question boils down to this, is there a real difference between these two in the eyes of the adcoms? And which would be more beneficial for my growth and development as a researcher? I am aiming for the research heavy schools and would also like to know how much research a typical applicant would have or how much they expect.
Thanks for reading and thoughts are appreciated!
So basically I have been doing clinical research for about a year now testing firefighters maximum oxygen consumption levels correlating it to cardiovascular disease. I believe this is classified as clinical research because I don't perform any 'bench' work per se. The project is coming to a close as our manuscript is almost written and now I have two options.
I can either continue this research next fall by maybe starting up another project under the same PI relating to the first project or pursue bench research in the microbiology department. The kicker is that I do not know how adcoms view clinical vs bench research and whether one "counts more" towards actual research that they are looking for. I highly enjoy the research I do now and especially like all of the people I work with so that is a major motivation. I also just got accepted to the SIP at the NIH for this summer and figured that might fulfill my empty bench research hole.
So basically, my question boils down to this, is there a real difference between these two in the eyes of the adcoms? And which would be more beneficial for my growth and development as a researcher? I am aiming for the research heavy schools and would also like to know how much research a typical applicant would have or how much they expect.
Thanks for reading and thoughts are appreciated!