- Joined
- Sep 11, 2005
- Messages
- 316
- Reaction score
- 1
Honestly, I am not very settled on any one specialty since I believe this is what rotations are for. But how should I ace this question?
Thanks!
Thanks!
str8flexed said:Honestly, I am not very settled on any one specialty since I believe this is what rotations are for. But how should I ace this question?
Thanks!
I agree, and you can use your clinical experience to backup your explanations.MiesVanDerMom said:i'm sure there are a few fields you're more interested in than others: specialist v. primary care, private practice v. teaching position or research, urban/suburban/rural, old patients v young, surgery v medicine, lots of patient contact v. very little or none, longer residency v. shorter residency. you must have some vision of your future life....? i'd use this to guide your answer
is there such a thing as pediatric gynecology?Pewl said:The correct answer is "radiation oncology!" followed by an awkward silence. =D
str8flexed said:is there such a thing as pediatric gynecology?
Pewl said:The correct answer is "radiation oncology!" followed by an awkward silence. =D
This is what I would do too.LaDoctorFutura said:i always answered with the specialty that I was intersted in, but ended by saying that I was open to experiencing everything. You want to look like you have been thinking about it, but not having made your decision already.
quantummechanic said:I find that offensive....
the thing is, I want to actually go into rad onc. I'm a physics major so I l would like to see a connection between my undergraduate education and my medical career, and I'm attracted by the heavy research aspect of rad onc as well as the ability to work with a wide variety of other medical professionals. Yeah its a great lifestyle, but I feel that I would want to do it even if it weren't as lucrative as some other specialties.
Is there something wrong with that? Is a valid, reasonable explanation that has been well thought out for entering a "lifestyle" specialty going to hurt me? Or should I say I want to be an FP and hate my life as I refer all the interesting stuff to specialized colleagues? **** that, I want to enter medicine to fix big problems.
I have talked to med students and rad oncologists about this very issue, and they have all told me to tell interviewers about my interest in the field as it should be a positive attribute to my interest in entering medicine. After all, I'm not saying that I am sure I will go into that field, just that it seems potentially cool at this point in time.
quantummechanic said:I find that offensive....
If you've seen any of Pewl's other posts, you'd realize that he's serious about rad onc too.... No need to get offended. He's probably just relaying his own experiences.
str8flexed said:is there such a thing as pediatric gynecology?
ShyRem said:I found it easier to say "well, I'm not sure what I area I plan to pursue... there are just so many I don't know enough about to make an informed decision. However, at this early stage I'm not particularly interested in ______" and list what you don't want to do. I didn't want peds, ortho, surgery, ophtho, GI, derm, or OB. I also stated that I might change my mind if I discover an absolute love for say, surgery, in my rotations, but at this time that's what my inclinations are against. Pretty much everything else was still on the table.
Generally this got pretty good reviews since I had a rather open mind about most areas of medicine.
Billy Shears said:I think he was joking. Furthermore, if that is a picture from those McDonald's commercials, I hate you.
Billy Shears said:There was no emotion in that. I don't really hate you--I don't even know you. But seriously, is that the McDonald's commercial in your avatar? If it is, I'd more likely hate myself for knowing that.
MiesVanDerMom said:i'm sure there are a few fields you're more interested in than others: specialist v. primary care, private practice v. teaching position or research, urban/suburban/rural, old patients v young, surgery v medicine, lots of patient contact v. very little or none, longer residency v. shorter residency. you must have some vision of your future life....? i'd use this to guide your answer
str8flexed said:is there such a thing as pediatric gynecology?
ShyRem said:I found it easier to say "well, I'm not sure what I area I plan to pursue... there are just so many I don't know enough about to make an informed decision. However, at this early stage I'm not particularly interested in ______" and list what you don't want to do. I didn't want peds, ortho, surgery, ophtho, GI, derm, or OB. I also stated that I might change my mind if I discover an absolute love for say, surgery, in my rotations, but at this time that's what my inclinations are against. Pretty much everything else was still on the table.
Generally this got pretty good reviews since I had a rather open mind about most areas of medicine.
Rafa said:^ There *are* actually pediatric gynecologists. They typically handle things associated with development and health of the child & the reproductive system. Incidentally, one of the more telling signs of child abuse is an STD in a child (since children generally aren't sexually active). For things like child pregnancies - which occur far more often in the US than people talk about - pregnancies are managed by obgyns specialized in child and adolescent physiology.
edit: as you can imagine, male pediatric gynecologists are few and far between. Here's a link typically summarizing what pobgyns do:
http://www.obgyn.wustl.edu/Divisions/pediatric.html
Billy Shears said:What's disturbing is the potential for doctors with less than moral intentions entering the field. But, that's a risk in peds urology or general peds as well. Kids need care too, even gynecological.
LaDoctorFutura said:i always answered with the specialty that I was intersted in, but ended by saying that I was open to experiencing everything. You want to look like you have been thinking about it, but not having made your decision already.
Rafa said:^ There *are* actually pediatric gynecologists. They typically handle things associated with development and health of the child & the reproductive system. Incidentally, one of the more telling signs of child abuse is an STD in a child (since children generally aren't sexually active). For things like child pregnancies - which occur far more often in the US than people talk about - pregnancies are managed by obgyns specialized in child and adolescent physiology.
edit: as you can imagine, male pediatric gynecologists are few and far between. Here's a link typically summarizing what pobgyns do:
http://www.obgyn.wustl.edu/Divisions/pediatric.html
jackieMD2007 said:Wow, I could imagine the need for this sort of thing. I think it would take a really special kind of person (kind of like the same people who take on social work with abused children) to go into this specialty.
Whoever joked about this is incredibly insensitive, and it was not funny.
jackieMD2007 said:I agree with this. We should be thinking about it, but how can we be expected to make a reasonable decision without doing rotations?
mshollywoodmd said:because women can be just as immoral as men but less statisical so
quantummechanic said:sexism works both ways I suppose
plz enlighten me with some evidence...
quantummechanic said:I find that offensive....
the thing is, I want to actually go into rad onc. I'm a physics major so I l would like to see a connection between my undergraduate education and my medical career, and I'm attracted by the heavy research aspect of rad onc as well as the ability to work with a wide variety of other medical professionals. Yeah its a great lifestyle, but I feel that I would want to do it even if it weren't as lucrative as some other specialties.
Is there something wrong with that? Is a valid, reasonable explanation that has been well thought out for entering a "lifestyle" specialty going to hurt me? Or should I say I want to be an FP and hate my life as I refer all the interesting stuff to specialized colleagues? **** that, I want to enter medicine to fix big problems.
I have talked to med students and rad oncologists about this very issue, and they have all told me to tell interviewers about my interest in the field as it should be a positive attribute to my interest in entering medicine. After all, I'm not saying that I am sure I will go into that field, just that it seems potentially cool at this point in time.
mshollywoodmd said:Women were 6.6% of the State prison inmates in 2001, up from 6% in 1995.
Sixty-four percent of prison inmates belonged to racial or ethnic minorities in 2001.
An estimated 57% of inmates were under age 35 in 2001.
About 4% of State prison inmates were not U.S. citizens at yearend 2001.
About 6% of State prison inmates were held in private facilities at yearend 2001.
Altogether, an estimated 57% of inmates had a high school diploma or its equivalent.
Among the State prison inmates in 2000:
-- nearly half were sentenced for a violent crime (49%)
-- a fifth were sentenced for a property crime (20%)
-- about a fifth were sentenced for a drug crime (21%
If women represented 6.6%, Who represents the remaining 93.4%? You guessed it.......Men
So either women are less immoral or better at not getting caught but with those percentages I vote for the former.
mshollywoodmd said:Women were 6.6% of the State prison inmates in 2001, up from 6% in 1995.
Sixty-four percent of prison inmates belonged to racial or ethnic minorities in 2001.
An estimated 57% of inmates were under age 35 in 2001.
About 4% of State prison inmates were not U.S. citizens at yearend 2001.
About 6% of State prison inmates were held in private facilities at yearend 2001.
Altogether, an estimated 57% of inmates had a high school diploma or its equivalent.
Among the State prison inmates in 2000:
-- nearly half were sentenced for a violent crime (49%)
-- a fifth were sentenced for a property crime (20%)
-- about a fifth were sentenced for a drug crime (21%
If women represented 6.6%, Who represents the remaining 93.4%? You guessed it.......Men
So either women are less immoral or better at not getting caught but with those percentages I vote for the former.
Pewl said:
... Dude, I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. I told the OP to say "radiation oncology" followed by an awkward silence because I feel that RADIATION ONCOLOGY IS AN AWESOME FIELD and that no further explanation was necessary. All of my work in graduate school was in radiation oncology and I was the treatment planning physicist for ucla's veterinary radiation oncology. I did internal and external dosimetry with stereotactic radiosurgery machines such as the Novalis and Cyberknife, both LDR and HDR brachytherapy, tomotherapy, and I've hammered out over a hundred treatment plans for veterinary oncology. Just like you, I enjoy physics. I'm currently a licensed medical physicist so you'd better believe that I am familiar with the field and that I, too, think highly of it.
You need to calm the hell down. I really hope you don't get wound up this quickly in real life over an ambiguous comment that someone makes as a JOKE. =P
TauPathology said:Dr. P is right. Statistics cannot prove your point, and its probably not a point you should actively pursue. Being an immoral person is not a crime, and thus many immoral people are not sent to jail. Many of the people in jail are more moral than you think, and resort to crime out of desperation. Your crime statistic is misplaced and tactless.
ShyRem said:I found it easier to say "well, I'm not sure what I area I plan to pursue... there are just so many I don't know enough about to make an informed decision. However, at this early stage I'm not particularly interested in ______" and list what you don't want to do. I didn't want peds, ortho, surgery, ophtho, GI, derm, or OB. I also stated that I might change my mind if I discover an absolute love for say, surgery, in my rotations, but at this time that's what my inclinations are against. Pretty much everything else was still on the table.
Generally this got pretty good reviews since I had a rather open mind about most areas of medicine.