- Joined
- Sep 2, 2002
- Messages
- 94
- Reaction score
- 1
Ok, I read many posts on here and this is the impression I got; give me your impressions/opinions on this.
1. Many people are just looking and studying AAMC practice materials (aamc practice items and tests) and seem to do well ( >30) without taking a review course.
2. Some of the exams that are published by the prep. companies are poor indicators of real test performance
.....This is the impression (and please give me yours) I feel that you could know all the science cold and still not score very well on this test. However, many people that are taking exams ( 8-10 Mcat exams) seem to do very well because of the practice that comes out of those tests.
So I have about 15 Mcat tests and all the aamc stuff. Should I just do all of these exams before the real thing and I should be fine........feedback please!
Also, If you learn all the science that is tested in the aamc tests (even the questions you miss) and learn the explanation that they give for each question is this as good as scoring a high score on these tests.
1. Many people are just looking and studying AAMC practice materials (aamc practice items and tests) and seem to do well ( >30) without taking a review course.
2. Some of the exams that are published by the prep. companies are poor indicators of real test performance
.....This is the impression (and please give me yours) I feel that you could know all the science cold and still not score very well on this test. However, many people that are taking exams ( 8-10 Mcat exams) seem to do very well because of the practice that comes out of those tests.
So I have about 15 Mcat tests and all the aamc stuff. Should I just do all of these exams before the real thing and I should be fine........feedback please!
Also, If you learn all the science that is tested in the aamc tests (even the questions you miss) and learn the explanation that they give for each question is this as good as scoring a high score on these tests.