Never have I said you personally need to take a booster today. Why are you personalizing this?
Naw man, its the hemming and hawing over a simple question that you still express uncertainty over.
The idea that the vaccines were, at any point, deadlier than the virus should be laughed at. It should be "demonized".
People interested in prioritizing public health should take strong stances like this.
Let’s revisit this in ten years. There are very few absolutes in medicine and science.
I submit to you:
Pain as the 5th vital sign and oxycodone overuse
Rofecoxib (Vioxx)
Valdecoxib (Bextra)
Aprotinin (Trasylol)
Hetastarch (Hespan)
Renal dose dopamine
Thalidomide for hyperemesis gravidum
Diethylstilbestrol for miscarriage prevention
Lobotomies to treat mental illness
Gabapentin for ERAS protocols
Cigarettes as a treatment for asthma ( sounds ridiculous now)
Heroin for cough suppression
Fen-Phen (Fenfluramine + Phentermine) for weight loss.
Radium to treat arthritis and other ailments
This is a good mix of some older and some more recent examples. Medicine is not an exact science and all of us should be asking tough questions to better ensure we reach the proper conclusions. The fact that you feel it is your moral imperative to demonize those who ask the tough questions is concerning.
To blindly believe that everything that is recommended should be adopted without question goes directly against the scientific method. Those who say “trust the science” were not willing to have their hypotheses tested during early Covid. Questioning the experts was not allowed, which goes
against the scientific method, actually.
All scientists and physicians should have a healthy skepticism. It sounds as if you blindly follow. Too much skepticism is bad. Too much blind following is bad. I think your level of blindly following is very dangerous. The fact that you feel the need to demonize anyone who asks questions makes it even more dangerous.