- Joined
- Feb 2, 2007
- Messages
- 4,131
- Reaction score
- 4,485
This gets debated or echoed all of the time on here (and in podiatry in general):
"The big stuff doesn't pay," "surgery doesn't pay well," "you make more by not doing surgery," "you make most of your money in the office," etc.
The numbers and the logic don't support this... at all:
or
www.acfas.org/compensation/
I think that it's best to have as much to offer your patients and the community as possible. Mainly, you need to be able to tell referral sources like PCPs, ERs, Urgent Cares, specialists, etc that they can send you whatever. This applies to any practice situation, esp PP. I've never had an ER call me to ask me if I can do a metatarsal fracture... and the reason for that is just that I tell them when I start at that hospital "I can handle pretty much anything below the knee." If they ever sent me a tib/fib or something I didn't want, I simply refer it promptly, but they want to know they can just send me anything and I can do 99.5% of it or refer the 0.5% out quick and appropriately. That barely ever happens, though. Whatever an office or ER calls with, I just say "send it," and the only ones I've ever not been able to handle were due to PAD or the patient personality/psych... and even those still get E&M and I was able to help them.
We often fail to realize that those who get strong training and do full F&A surgery can also still do the conservative injects, bracing, orthotics, testing, etc. It's not like since I do the triple I couldn't do the 3 injections and the Arizona brace and PT refer first. The only difference is that having the surgical skills lets you see patients through to the end.. which is great for practice rep, patient trust, and many other things. Obviously, surgery doesn't pay zero either. Even in the global, the XR, the casts, the DME, complications, other problems to break the global, etc all pay you. Those are the reasons all of the surveys have the surgically trained and certified DPMs making more income on average.
Lastly, if you want employed jobs (ortho, hospital, MSG, etc), those will by and large prefer surgically trained DPMs since they will usually have plenty of them in the application pool. For PP, it can be more variable, but good training helps to protect you from being limited... and can give you improved negotiation power also.
Bottom line: don't sell yourself short on training. Don't listen to the noise that it's fine to settle, fine to not try for boards, etc. Try to achieve your potential. You can duck the cases but you lying to patients that they don't need surgery is something you can't escape. Don't miss out on gaining skills... you won't be able to go back later. There are plenty of Harvard trained attorneys who don't work a bigshot govt or Fortune 100 job, but there are hardly any Podunk Law School attorneys who are competitive for major firms or trials. Podiatry is no different. Training matters... it translates into results - for you and for your patients.
It is good to be able to offer as many services as possible, and it does statistically pay more to be doing RRA and surgery... and to be board certified.
/rant
"The big stuff doesn't pay," "surgery doesn't pay well," "you make more by not doing surgery," "you make most of your money in the office," etc.
The numbers and the logic don't support this... at all:
or
www.acfas.org/compensation/
I think that it's best to have as much to offer your patients and the community as possible. Mainly, you need to be able to tell referral sources like PCPs, ERs, Urgent Cares, specialists, etc that they can send you whatever. This applies to any practice situation, esp PP. I've never had an ER call me to ask me if I can do a metatarsal fracture... and the reason for that is just that I tell them when I start at that hospital "I can handle pretty much anything below the knee." If they ever sent me a tib/fib or something I didn't want, I simply refer it promptly, but they want to know they can just send me anything and I can do 99.5% of it or refer the 0.5% out quick and appropriately. That barely ever happens, though. Whatever an office or ER calls with, I just say "send it," and the only ones I've ever not been able to handle were due to PAD or the patient personality/psych... and even those still get E&M and I was able to help them.
We often fail to realize that those who get strong training and do full F&A surgery can also still do the conservative injects, bracing, orthotics, testing, etc. It's not like since I do the triple I couldn't do the 3 injections and the Arizona brace and PT refer first. The only difference is that having the surgical skills lets you see patients through to the end.. which is great for practice rep, patient trust, and many other things. Obviously, surgery doesn't pay zero either. Even in the global, the XR, the casts, the DME, complications, other problems to break the global, etc all pay you. Those are the reasons all of the surveys have the surgically trained and certified DPMs making more income on average.
Lastly, if you want employed jobs (ortho, hospital, MSG, etc), those will by and large prefer surgically trained DPMs since they will usually have plenty of them in the application pool. For PP, it can be more variable, but good training helps to protect you from being limited... and can give you improved negotiation power also.
Bottom line: don't sell yourself short on training. Don't listen to the noise that it's fine to settle, fine to not try for boards, etc. Try to achieve your potential. You can duck the cases but you lying to patients that they don't need surgery is something you can't escape. Don't miss out on gaining skills... you won't be able to go back later. There are plenty of Harvard trained attorneys who don't work a bigshot govt or Fortune 100 job, but there are hardly any Podunk Law School attorneys who are competitive for major firms or trials. Podiatry is no different. Training matters... it translates into results - for you and for your patients.
Yeah, I trimmed a lot of this post quoted above, but it is all pretty spot-on....Without “superstars” our profession will remain stagnant. Without “superstars” our profession will always be followers and not leaders...
Those who don’t perform major rearfoot, reconstructive and ankle surgery ... are always preaching how you really can’t make any money doing those cases.
Sure, you can make lots of money hawking $700 orthoses when the majority of those patients would have equal success with a pair or $50 PowerSteps.
Sure, you can convince a patient to have laser surgery for nails for lots of money, knowing that it won’t have any beneficial effect.
Sure, you can sell antifungal nail polish at your front counter, knowing you’ve REALLY helped patients with that crap.
Sure, you can sell vitamins to “cure” their neuropathy, knowing they can buy the same ingredients at Target.
... Is it all about how much more you can make in your office or is about offering and providing the best care, regardless of reimbursement?
And for what it’s worth, I know lots of well trained DPMs who perform a LOT of major cases and are doing VERY well financially...
It is good to be able to offer as many services as possible, and it does statistically pay more to be doing RRA and surgery... and to be board certified.
/rant