- Joined
- Jul 5, 2022
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 0
Removed because I did not want this info easily accessible on the internet. : P
Last edited:
My bad, fixed the first sentence of my post to reflect that I will be applying this upcoming cycle.Clarify please: you have NOT submitted an AMCAS 2025 this summer.
Get the word "projected" off your 250 hours before applying.
If you are applying this year you need to submit your application in the next week and submit all your secondaries by late September.My bad, fixed the first sentence of my post to reflect that I will be applying this year.
Sorry, I caused a miscommunication. I meant at the end of this school year (i.e. I will be submitting my application June of 2025). Thank you for the list! I really appreciate it. Do you think I could get away with applying to just 25 schools or would that be unnecessarily risky?If you are applying this year you need to submit your application in the next week and submit all your secondaries by late September.
Your lack of non clinical volunteering hours (only 30) will limit your chances for interviews. I suggest these schools with your stats:
Washington University (in St. Louis-almost a guaranteed interview with your stats)
Vanderbilt
USF Morsani
Duke
U Virginia
Johns Hopkins
UPenn
Jefferson
Pittsburgh
Rochester
Hofstra
Einstein
Mount Sinai
New York Medical College
Vermont
Tufts
Boston University
UMass
Cincinnati
Ohio State
U Michigan
Northwestern
Iowa
Colorado
Arizona (Phoenix)
The UCs
USC Keck
Stanford
Kaiser
25 is fine as a number as long as you have a strong mission alignment. Don't fall for the shotgun approach and waste money and time. Assume every application comes with a secondary or a school-specific portal to set up, which would take you at least a day to complete.Sorry, I caused a miscommunication. I meant at the end of this school year (i.e. I will be submitting my application June of 2025). Thank you for the list! I really appreciate it. Do you think I could get away with applying to just 25 schools or would that be unnecessarily risky?