- Joined
- Aug 20, 2006
- Messages
- 3,923
- Reaction score
- 1,248
It's good to discuss all sides of an issue, but it can and should be done without any negative comments directed toward others. Keep it civil, please.
Exactly. Obviously breastfeeding has great benefits, but people who argue for mothers "taking care of their kids" are usually not just talking about breastfeeding, or the age when kids breastfeeding. Five year olds don't need mother's milk anymore.Do some research on mother-infant reciprocity during the first years of life and its impact on the formation of healthy socialization and self-esteem. As seen touted proudly in the posts above, the ability to contain and nourish life in its primitive stage is a uniquely feminine gift. That ability, however, has consequences with development that reach beyond parturition. The entire process of suckling a child, colostrum, and weaning is absolutely important in that it is the first stable contact the child has with another human and therefore forms the basis for the child's decision to either trust or mistrust future interactions. Does that mean there's only one way to raise a child? No. Does it mean that "it doesn't matter how you raise your kid cause some turn out good and some turn out bad anyway"? Well that's for the person involved to decide. There is, however, a difference between mother-infant contact and father-infant contact. I will totally give you though that beyond a certain age it becomes less important who is the caregiver. I'm sure a kid can turn out okay from being sung lullabies by his dad and sucking down baby milk from a bottle instead of a teet during infancy but you have to admit, it isn't as natural.
wait... so I can't breast feed anymoreExactly. Obviously breastfeeding has great benefits, but people who argue for mothers "taking care of their kids" are usually not just talking about breastfeeding, or the age when kids breastfeeding. Five year olds don't need mother's milk anymore.
No one's saying that. I guess you could pump, although those things disturb me.wait... so I can't breast feed anymore
No one's saying that. I guess you could pump, although those things disturb me.
haha I was making a joke scarlet! I mean, it's not like I was still breast feeding over the age of 10... Ew imagine if people did that tho
My bf (i prefer to call him 'AF' almost fiance lol) and I are considering getting married, but he wants me to explain how having a family+medicine would work for both of us. I have 2 teaching certifications and he thinks I should stick with teaching. I do enjoy teaching but cannot find a regular job, and have been dreaming about medicine for a long time.
He says we shouldn't bring a kid into the world if we cannot devote our time to 'it'. I was upset at first...saying why do i have to choose between career and family and you don't....and he said, "you know, I wish I had the choice like you, but i *need* to have the career in order to have a family, you don't." As annoying as it is, it's true, my parents definitely would not accept an unemployed son-in-law aspiring to be a stay-at home dad, while a female version of this is considered ok by most people. Another obvious thing he said was that as much as he wants to help me, he cannot be pregnant and nurse the child for me.
Anyway, I have been thinking so much about the purpose of my life the last few days and what my old dreams were. is my life just to get married, and fertilized? On the other hand, my mom has 4 cousins who never got married, and now they are in their 50s and they say it is very isolating socially and they have intense regret for not marrying/having children. I don't want to be either person.
I had a blurry idea of my ideal life at 30 as a teenager. I thought I would be a
* MD
*married
* At least 2 kids by age 35
*Stay at home with them for the first 3 years.
*Travel during summer to my parent's native country and having a free clinic. Operating on fistulas, or people with cataracts. Somehow I was doing both. lol. (of course i know about specialties now)
Now I think about all these bits and pieces together and realize I really can't 'have it all'.They don't even match up.
I'm feeling more pressure to figure out what I want the most in my 'ideal picture' because AF says we are going to be over if I don't finalize a plan soon.
so i thought about it, see this is the 'ideal' US med path:
18-22 Undergrad
22-26 Medical School
26-30 1 yr Transitional year+3 yr Residency (for Gas, oph, obgyn)
30-34
35 dramatic decrease in fertility
So if I had followed the standard route, i would have had a window between 30-34 to have kids, stay at home with them, and then practice. A little tight, but possible.
But right now, if I pursue medicine, the path would be:
18-24 Undergrad
25 Unemployed, but looking for job, write MCAT
26 apply/gap between acceptance and start
27-31 Medical School
31-35 Residency
Of course you can have kids in medical school or residency, but then you may have to compromise on not being their primary caregiver timewise. You might also have to compromise on the # of kids you are able to have. And note that the 'ideal' timeline isn't followed by most people these days, many people take 5 years for undergrad, or time to gain life experience.
You can definitely become a doctor, but you will have to alter your expectations of home life to find your own balance. You would definitely need outside help. Ex. Nanny, housekeeper, grandma, daycare, etc. As long as you manage your expectations, and time, having a family and being a doctor are doable.
I guess I just don't see motherhood and career as exclusive. Especially if you do not have like 5 kids, there is a lot of down time. You are not any less of a mother if you have a professional housekeeper or gardener or whatever, and like I said, you don't need to be the one to change every diaper or make every meal to be a mother. Giving advice and guidance and love is still possible if you have a job--that's why fathers can still be fathers even if they have a full-time job and no one holds it against them.I appreciate your dillemma, I am certainly not going to try to guilt you into one decision or another. But I am sure that you can appreciate the notion that has become popular which says that for a woman to be fulfilled, she must have a career. That to stay home requires you suppressing who you are, etc. I just want to say that I think that motherhood is the noblest calling in the world. Think about that, Men physically cannot nuture a child the way that a woman can. I feel strongly that men cannot come close to understanding the bond between mother and child. Many women want to go into medicine for altruistic reasons, and that is great. But don't for a moment think that staying home and raising your children is one iota less worthwhile than being a physician. Don't think that because you feel a need to raise your children, that you are taking the easy way out, or that you are selling yourself short. In my opinion, you are taking the more noble path. Doctors work hard, long hours, but they also get the respect, the money, the status. Mothers work is essentially the same, though without the pay.
I hope that if you decide to devote your time to raising your children, you will do it without regrets. I hope that you will appreciate the magnitude of the task you have undertaken and that you don't let the naysayers who think that you are selling yourself short, get you down. Mother's are vital to a healthy society. Theirs is a sacred, divinely appointed role for which there is no better substitute.
good luck with your decision.
Haha appreciatedhaha I was making a joke scarlet! I mean, it's not like I was still breast feeding over the age of 10... Ew imagine if people did that tho
But if you know that you don't want to do that, that it would not be satisfying for you, you're not failing your kids.
Same. I've heard that <statistic> doctors are the unhappiest people amongst occupations. That doesn't suprise me.This is an interesting topic that I've often wondered about myself.
Same. I've heard that <statistic> doctors are the unhappiest people amongst occupations. That doesn't suprise me.
I've never heard that. I've always heard it was social workers and things who were the unhappiest.
However, you really can't go by statistics like that, you have to take them with a grain of salt. When you think about it, why would a doctor who was very happy with life and their career take the time to fill out a survey like that? I'm sure they'd have better things to do. Normally it's the unhappy ones who feel the need to express their frustration that take the surveys, and thereby skew the results.
Same. I've heard that <statistic> doctors are the unhappiest people amongst occupations. That doesn't suprise me.
Yes, dentists get very depressed having to work 4 days a wk (30-40 hrs) and making 6 figure incomes. Sheesh...what was I thinking?!
It is a well known fact that dentists have the highest suicide rates, followed closely by air-traffic-controllers. My dad's brother has a dog who's veterinarian's pharmacist said so. And he should know.
You can see it for yourself at www.gullible.com
lol
Ok...jokes aside, it gets stressful owning a private practice no matter if its dental or med. Almost all dentists I know are very satisfied with their career and what they do, and that says a lot more to me than what I may "read". The ones that are not happy are those who have been pushed into dentistry and didn't want to be a dentist in the first place.
.
My point is that we shouldn't be too rigid about our positions about what is best; sometimes the non-conventional arrangements can turn out to be just as healthy or even better for a child.