Sometimes I think these terms are too vague to be of any use to anyone. I’ve heard integrated practice being referred to as the use in incorporating complimentary/alternative medicine into psychiatric practice or putting psychiatrists in other locations to increase access. From a service delivery perspective, integrative care is a system where psychiatrists manage their patients in both an inpatient and outpatient setting.
When I trained, we would have psychiatrists who would look after public inpatients, and another group in the community who would look after public outpatients. If an outpatient became very unwell, or was non-compliant and needed involuntary care, they would need an admission. The patient goes to hospital and gets looked after by the inpatient team. When they get better they get discharged to the outpatient team. At a different service, they used what they termed to be a more “integrative” model, where the outpatient psychiatrist would be responsible for the care of their patients while in an inpatient setting. The rationale for this was that the outpatient team has known the patients for longer, so should be better placed to manage them, as well as other things like reducing errors made in handover and trying to reduce admissions unless absolutely necessary. My service tried to introduce something similar, where one of the outpatient teams who manages mainly chronic patients would manage their own inpatients. It ended up being too much work for that team which only had a part time psychiatrist (0.5-0.6 FTE) and junior doctor (1.0 FTE). In contrast, our inpatient coverage was around 3 psychiatrists (2.0 FTE) and 4 junior doctors (4.0 FTE) for 25 inpatients, less those managed by the community team.