- Joined
- Jul 11, 2013
- Messages
- 1,978
- Reaction score
- 4,685
Not a surprise...Psych getting more competitive again.
I don't get why neurology is not a competitive specialty...
Salary $300k+, average lifestyle and you are a specialist in only 4-yr
How many people in your class even liked the neuro module? Like zero, lol
Neuro was like our most popular module.
Wow, that's a major surprise. Most people I know hate it. I don't hate it, but I find it annoying. Only ones I truly hate are embryo and genetics
Ranked only 1 program.
I agree. I was between neuro, rad and IM. Neuro module scared me.How many people in your class even liked the neuro module? Like zero, lol
Is it much more competitive than last year?Psych getting more competitive again.
Is it much more competitive than last year?
I don't get why neurology is not a competitive specialty...
Salary $300k+, average lifestyle and you are a specialist in only 4-yr
Psych getting more competitive again.
Yeah Psyc looks more or less the same to me. Your odds don't change much jumping between different step 1 score ranges. It just shows Psyc is more "selective" towards students committed to the field than "competitive".Not really, 61.2% of US seniors took psych spots. Similar to peds.
What metrics do you guys focus on in this document for the specialty of your choice?
How do you figure?Looks like Anesthesiology became more competitive.
Not really, 61.2% of US seniors took psych spots. Similar to peds.
You were a shoe-in with a 220+ before. You aren't anymore. Comparing old vs new. For DOs at least. Not sure how it is in the MD world.How do you figure?
Our curriculum is taught mostly by MDs and an MD created the overall curriculum. The way they taught the module was very cool and made the subject very accessible. That’s probably why people liked it so much.
Rads matched number of research experiences was less than their unmatched haha good news for me
Seems that way from SDN but only 2 other people in my class are so who knows.Someone recently said that a ton of people are applying rads this year. Can you confirm?
0 from mineSeems that way from SDN but only 2 other people in my class are so who knows.
It's not distributed as normally as most other specialties that are about as competitive as it is = messy in my book. Obviously something else has to be going on to explain the higher/not declining unmatched proportions at higher scores.Not really. It's hard to really see what the driver is with the lower match rate in the 230s than 220s, but stuff like this can be explained by the crappy advising at DO schools. I know too many applicants at my school with terrible strategies, who would probably match if they approached the process differently.
I'm actually pretty interested in neuro, and I'm between neuro and IM, but neuro scares me a little. I heard it's also one of the most grueling residency programs, so I am going to have to rotate in it at a few places to see how I like it.I agree. I was between neuro, rad and IM. Neuro module scared me.
Only three people in my class applied neuro and all of them matched into good programs, and one of them had very low score.
I would not put that on school advising... You are soon-to-be a physician so do you want someone who probably has not even been thru this process to tell you how to strategize for the match?Not really. It's hard to really see what the driver is with the lower match rate in the 230s than 220s, but stuff like this can be explained by the crappy advising at DO schools. I know too many applicants at my school with terrible strategies, who would probably match if they approached the process differently.
It's only 4-yr...I'm actually pretty interested in neuro, and I'm between neuro and IM, but neuro scares me a little. I heard it's also one of the most grueling residency programs, so I am going to have to rotate in it at a few places to see how I like it.
Thanks for the insight. I will have to make up my mind in the next year or so. Hopefully, whatever decision I make, I won't regret it lol.It's only 4-yr...
I probably would choose neuro if I had to do it again. I like taking care of IM patient, but hate dealing with social issues which a big part of IM.
It's not distributed as normally as most other specialties that are about as competitive as it is = messy in my book. Obviously something else has to be going on to explain the higher/not declining unmatched proportions at higher scores.
I’m applying neuro if ya wanna bounce off ideas on itThanks for the insight. I will have to make up my mine in the next year or so. Hopefully, whatever decision I make, I won't regret it lol.
OBGyn has disproportionate # of applicants per spot... It's a semi mess for MD applicants as well.
I hear you. With all the good that seems to come with neuro, there are a lot of concerns regarding residency that make me think twice sometimes. I primarily want to do it because I love the inherent complexity and the unknowns of the NS, and being able to use a wide knowledge of that system to Dx and Tx really seems to fill the shoes of what I envision a specialist to be. That, and there is a lot of micromanaging details. And I am the king of that lol. But the long hours and frivolous consults do make me think “well...maybe psych?” Lol! But of course, there is that big part of me that doesn’t want to lose my stethoscope, reflex hammer, and ophthalmoscope. So there’s that. Plus, definitely shouldn’t just choose a specialty because the hours are luxurious either. Looking forward to figuring that out this year.I'm actually pretty interested in neuro, and I'm between neuro and IM, but neuro scares me a little. I heard it's also one of the most grueling residency programs, so I am going to have to rotate in it at a few places to see how I like it.
I've actually been stalking your posts lately lol. I will keep you in mind next year for sure.I’m applying neuro if ya wanna bounce off ideas on it
Exactly!!! I like the positive aspects of it, and from what I've seen, I like the clinical aspects of it too, but the negatives (grueling residency, burn out rate, consults, ect...) just scare me a little, and don't wanna go in it and find out that I really hate it lol.I hear you. With all the good that seems to come with neuro, there are a lot of concerns regarding residency that make me think twice sometimes. I primarily want to do it because I love the inherent complexity and the unknowns of the NS, and being able to use a wide knowledge of that system to Dx and Tx really seems to fill the shoes of what I envision a specialist to be. That, and there is a lot of micromanaging details. And I am the king of that lol. But the long hours and frivolous consults do make me think “well...maybe psych?” Lol! But of course, there is that big part of me that doesn’t want to lose my stethoscope, reflex hammer, and ophthalmoscope. So there’s that. Plus, definitely shouldn’t just choose a specialty because the hours are luxurious either. Looking forward to figuring that out this year.
Psych is the last thing you should consider if frivolous consults are a turnoff.....and frivolous consults do make me think “well...maybe psych?”....
I would not put that on school advising... You are soon-to-be a physician so do you want someone who probably has not even been thru this process to tell you how to strategize for the match?
My school used actual physician advisors in the specialty you were applying toI would not put that on school advising... You are soon-to-be a physician so do you want someone who probably has not even been thru this process to tell you how to strategize for the match?
I learned this day one of my psych rotationPsych is the last thing you should consider if frivolous consults are a turnoff.