Yo,
FA 2017 says that with distal lesions of median or ulnar nerves comes the exaggeration of the loss of lumbricals due to the remaining extrinsic flexors of the digits --> fingers extend at MCP, flex at DIP and PIP joints.
I don't get it. What is meant with "remaining extrinsic flexors"? If the median nerve is damaged, so will (apart from the second and third lumbrical) the other flexors in the forearm affecting the digits. And even if they weren't damaged; why would they suddenly do the opposite of the lumbricals by extending at MCP and flexing at the DIP and PIP joints?
Somebody clarify this!
FA 2017 says that with distal lesions of median or ulnar nerves comes the exaggeration of the loss of lumbricals due to the remaining extrinsic flexors of the digits --> fingers extend at MCP, flex at DIP and PIP joints.
I don't get it. What is meant with "remaining extrinsic flexors"? If the median nerve is damaged, so will (apart from the second and third lumbrical) the other flexors in the forearm affecting the digits. And even if they weren't damaged; why would they suddenly do the opposite of the lumbricals by extending at MCP and flexing at the DIP and PIP joints?
Somebody clarify this!