- Joined
- Dec 14, 2001
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 0
Ahhhhh the lights are starting to go on for melancholy but we need to turn the dimmer switch up a bit and clear up a few things. Kudos to Teloola for a good explanation of what significance the standard deviation is.
Now to clear up a few points, the standard dev was clearly written on kiick's modest statistical work up and it was in fact 10.1 on an average pre curved score of 70.8%. I am sure that he did it on a computer spreadsheet such as MS excel. As teloola so clearly pointed out with with a NORMAL distribution 2 std devs would encompass most people in the class, but again we are not dealing with normal grade analysis.
Second, kiick's grading system may very well be somewhat standard for undergrad grading but it has some serious flaws not to mention we are no longer in an undergrad program. First of all it assumes a bell shaped curve or some other acceptable distribution, when instead the final curve in this system can be seriously skewed by just such an individual as taloola referenced. Once again the very large std dev is very problematic and no there is nothing that can be done about a particular std dev but what can be done is to take a good look at the exam or the instruction given for the exam. After which a fair grading scale can be arived at and I do stress fair. That was not done in this case. The taking the highest grade in the class and making that 99.5 and basing the curve around that is in fact still ARBITRARY. And while talking about this let me ask why kiick didn't post a histogram of this exam as he did for the last exam? Could it be he didn't want his collegues to develop and even dimmer view of him or could it be that he simply didn't want us to know the full extent of the academic homicide he committed?
Another point for melancholy and others to ponder about our dear friend kiick is that in comparison to other professors he may post his meager stat workup but he DOES NOT post his exam. Why is that, when every other professor except the anatomy dept (another aberrant department) posts exams? Curious isn't it. Another comparison point is that he is the only professor that I know of to urge students to withdraw or when a student arrives at that decision on their to encourage them in that decision. No dissuasion here. This brings me to my next point or new bit of info "if you will".
The culling of the class has begun anew. I was told by one of the class that approximately 10 more people have decided or been persuaded to persue other opportunities for the time being somewhere other than COMP. This brings the total up to about 20 - 30 who have, as I said above decided that perhaps being at COMP is not the best thing for them. Now of this latest harvest some where offered a leave of abscence before the biochem grade apparently has been posted but others where urged to withdraw. Now this is a different stance than before Christmas, could it be that even the ham handed dean, craig lenz, has realized that perhaps there is a problem? Once again the word arbitrary comes to mind, some are offered leave of abscence and some are urged to withdraw when they have the same grades. I am anticipating that after head/neck and then again after neuro there will be more bloodletting.
One last thing to clear up, and that is the mirage in the desert disgused anatomy remdiation in the nebraska. It's hillarious the way this is whispered as a means to encouragement to those who have failed anatomy. Last year I think one person remediated there and that I can't confirm right now. Make no mistake about it, the probability of remediation in nebraska is not high.
The last thing I want to leave with you is that we can debate and talk about fair grading til the proverbial sun comes up but we are talking about real people and their futures, I do know someone who failed by 1/10 of one percent. That is completely unacceptable. This person could have passed if they had made one guess on one exam correctly. No where does kiick demonstrate the humility that perhaps there were bad questions he did not recognize. So, it will be interesting to see just how many people leave this class in one way or another.
Oh, and melancholy, what makes you think I have left?
Now to clear up a few points, the standard dev was clearly written on kiick's modest statistical work up and it was in fact 10.1 on an average pre curved score of 70.8%. I am sure that he did it on a computer spreadsheet such as MS excel. As teloola so clearly pointed out with with a NORMAL distribution 2 std devs would encompass most people in the class, but again we are not dealing with normal grade analysis.
Second, kiick's grading system may very well be somewhat standard for undergrad grading but it has some serious flaws not to mention we are no longer in an undergrad program. First of all it assumes a bell shaped curve or some other acceptable distribution, when instead the final curve in this system can be seriously skewed by just such an individual as taloola referenced. Once again the very large std dev is very problematic and no there is nothing that can be done about a particular std dev but what can be done is to take a good look at the exam or the instruction given for the exam. After which a fair grading scale can be arived at and I do stress fair. That was not done in this case. The taking the highest grade in the class and making that 99.5 and basing the curve around that is in fact still ARBITRARY. And while talking about this let me ask why kiick didn't post a histogram of this exam as he did for the last exam? Could it be he didn't want his collegues to develop and even dimmer view of him or could it be that he simply didn't want us to know the full extent of the academic homicide he committed?
Another point for melancholy and others to ponder about our dear friend kiick is that in comparison to other professors he may post his meager stat workup but he DOES NOT post his exam. Why is that, when every other professor except the anatomy dept (another aberrant department) posts exams? Curious isn't it. Another comparison point is that he is the only professor that I know of to urge students to withdraw or when a student arrives at that decision on their to encourage them in that decision. No dissuasion here. This brings me to my next point or new bit of info "if you will".
The culling of the class has begun anew. I was told by one of the class that approximately 10 more people have decided or been persuaded to persue other opportunities for the time being somewhere other than COMP. This brings the total up to about 20 - 30 who have, as I said above decided that perhaps being at COMP is not the best thing for them. Now of this latest harvest some where offered a leave of abscence before the biochem grade apparently has been posted but others where urged to withdraw. Now this is a different stance than before Christmas, could it be that even the ham handed dean, craig lenz, has realized that perhaps there is a problem? Once again the word arbitrary comes to mind, some are offered leave of abscence and some are urged to withdraw when they have the same grades. I am anticipating that after head/neck and then again after neuro there will be more bloodletting.
One last thing to clear up, and that is the mirage in the desert disgused anatomy remdiation in the nebraska. It's hillarious the way this is whispered as a means to encouragement to those who have failed anatomy. Last year I think one person remediated there and that I can't confirm right now. Make no mistake about it, the probability of remediation in nebraska is not high.
The last thing I want to leave with you is that we can debate and talk about fair grading til the proverbial sun comes up but we are talking about real people and their futures, I do know someone who failed by 1/10 of one percent. That is completely unacceptable. This person could have passed if they had made one guess on one exam correctly. No where does kiick demonstrate the humility that perhaps there were bad questions he did not recognize. So, it will be interesting to see just how many people leave this class in one way or another.
Oh, and melancholy, what makes you think I have left?