Congratulations, Pain MD's just got a 7% pay cut...

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

drusso

Full Member
Moderator Emeritus
Lifetime Donor
Joined
Nov 21, 1998
Messages
12,554
Reaction score
6,937
CMS Announces 2021 Physician Fee Schedules and Other Important Updates

As usual, today, August 4, 2020, ASIPP would like to share multiple news from the President, and CMS covering the following issues:

1. Executive order expanding telehealth benefits permanently for Medicare beneficiaries beyond the COVID-19 public health emergency.
2. CMS physician payment proposed rule for 2021
3. ASC and HOPD proposed payment rates for 2021

"First, on behalf of ASIPP board and the entire membership and chronic pain patients across the nation, we want to acknowledge all the interest President Trump has shown and hard work that Administrator Seema Verma, Secretary Azar, and the staff at HHS and CMS have done throughout he extraordinary challenges of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, and also for working with the interventional pain management community to assure the patients can still get the care they require," said Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of ASIPP and SIPMS.

1. PRESIDENT TRUMP'S EXECUTIVE ORDER TO EXPAND TELEHEALTH BENEFITS PERMANENTLY

The President proposed the executive rule in advance of the CMS announcements on August 4, 2020, improving convenience and care for Medicare beneficiaries, particularly those living in rural areas. The executive order will expand telehealth benefits permanent for Medicare beneficiaries beyond the COVID-19 public health emergency and advances access to care in rural areas.

CMS states that they are considering whether these policies should be extended on a temporary basis (that is, if the Public Health Emergency (PHE)) ends in 2021. These policies could be extended to December 31, 2021 to allow for a transition period before reverting to status quo policy or be made permanent. CMS is soliciting public comments on whether these policies should continue once the PHE ends.

The issue for interventional pain physicians, which ASIPP has been working tirelessly, is answered with the same payments as if patients were seen inside the hospital with telephone only codes as follows:

CPT 99441 - phone only, 5-10 minutes $54.20
CPT 99442 - phone only, 11-20 minutes $87.10
CPT 99443 - phone only, 21-30 minutes $123.56

Once again, this is a national rate.

2. PHYSICIAN FEE SCHEDULE FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2021

CMS has released proposed policy changes to the Medicare physician fee schedule for calender year 2021 on August 3, 2020 at midnight (https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2020-17127.pdf). CMS claims that the calender year 2021 PFS proposed rule is one of several proposed rules that reflect a broader administration - wide strategy to create a health care system that results in better accessibility, quality, affordability, empowerment, and innovation.

For interventional pain management programs for interventional pain management physicians, an overall picture shows that there is a 7% combined impact in reference to the charges by specialty, while many of the other specialties have shown decreases. A few specialties like endocrinology, family practices, general practices, and internal medicine have shown increases.

Consequently, multiple surgical specialists are extremely upset about this payment rule; however, for interventional pain physicians, it has not been that bad.

ASIPP has calculated the proposed preliminary physician payment rates compared to 2020.

Overall physician payment rates have shown declines, specifically, more commonly utilized procedures when performed in a facility setting, meaning ASC or hospital. The cuts are much less when performed in an office setting (non-facility setting). The schedule shows these payments: http://www.asipp.org/Fee%20Schedules/2021PhyPro.pdf

Physician payment rule specifically deals with payment updates with reduction in the conversion factor for 2021 of $32.26, down from $36.09 in 2020.

The major reductions are based on the reconfiguration of CPT codes for evaluation and management services with increased payments, but based on time rather than components. The average increase in work RVU values is 8% or 0.17 work RVUs, for new patient codes and 28% or 0.33 work RVUs, for established patient visit codes.

https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/proposed-policy-payment-and-quality-provisions-changes-medicare-physician-fee-schedule-calendar-year-4

CMS is required to keep the PFS budget neutral, which means that increasing the work RVU values for these 9 codes would require CMS to decrease work RVU values for other CPT codes, reduce the conversion factor, or some combination of both.

CMS announced in the calendar year 2020 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) final rule that it would implement changes to office visit Evaluation and Management codes for the 2021 calendar year.

The expected 2021 PFS changes include documentation and code selection updates and updates to work RVU (wRVU) values. This alert will focus on the wRVU value updates that affect code ranges 99201 to 99205 (new patient visit codes) and 99211 to 99215 (established patient visit codes).

2.1 Evaluation and Management Services

CMS announced its plan to remove code 99201 from the new patient visit code range increase the wRVU values for the remaining new patient and established patient visit codes as outlined in the tables below:

2021 Physician Proposed Payment Rates for E/M Services

CPTDescription'Non-Facility
(office)
Facility
(ASC/HOPD)
99201Office/outpatient visit newDeletedDeleted
99202New Patient Office Visit$69.04$46.13
99203New Patient Office Visit$106.14$78.07
99204New Patient Office Visit$159.37$127.75
99205New Patient Office Visit$210.66$173.88
99211Office/outpatient established patient$22.26$8.71
99212Office/outpatient established patient$54.20$34.20
99213Office/outpatient established patient$86.78$63.23
99214Office/outpatient established patient$122.91$93.23
99215Office/outpatient established patient$172.27$137.75
99441Phone e/m phys/qhp 5-10 min$54.20$34.20
99442Phone e/m phys/qhp 11-20 min$87.10$63.55
99443Phone e/m phys/qhp 21-30 min$123.56$93.88


The average increase in wRVU values is 8 percent, or 0.17 wRVUs, for new patient codes and 28 percent, or 0.33 wRVUs, for established patient visit codes.

CMS is required to keep the PFS budget neutral, which means that increasing the wRVU values for these nine codes would require CMS to decrease wRVU values for other CPT codes, reduce the conversion factor, or some combination of both.

2.2 Telehealth

CMS proposed several services to the Medicare telehealth services list during the public health emergency for the COVID-19 pandemic, including home visits for established patients and psychological and neuropsychological testing.

One of the expansions which ASIPP has worked tirelessly was telephone only. We are grateful to CMS that they retained not only the codes, but also the payment rates as if a patient was seen in the office.

3. AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER AND HOPD RULE

CMS has released the 2021 proposed payment rule for ASCs and HOPDs today. Overall, ASCs received inflation update factor of 3% similar to HOPDs, whereas conversion factor remains $48.984 for ASCs compared to $83.697 for HOPD.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2020-17086.pdf

Multiple codes have been added; however, none of these are related to interventional pain management.

This rule published provides us with proposed payment rates for 2021 for ASCs, as well as hospitals. We will focus on ASCs as of now, in the future we will publish hospital rates too. As shown in the links below, there have been some increases to majority of the codes.

http://www.asipp.org/Fee%20Schedules/2021ASCPro.pdf
http://www.asipp.org/Fee%20Schedules/2021HOPDPro.pdf

Some of the codes with major abnormalities are intercostal nerve blocks (first level) and intercostal nerve block add-on codes (the definition was changed last year), but CMS continues to follow the old philosophy. It also raises the doubts: Did CMS ask for the revision of the codes or did someone ask the AMA to change these codes? Consequently, reimbursement levels for these still appear to be inappropriate. Further, reimbursement for genicular nerve blocks and genicular nerve radiofrequency also seem to be still inadequate and inaccurate.

We will keep you posted on these issues and for other news. Thank you, stay safe and healthy, and good luck.

Members don't see this ad.
 
I’ll take the pay cut but draw the line at permanent telehealth benefits. I absolutely hate those “visits”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
IMG_8139.JPG


Notice who got the raises
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Members don't see this ad :)
So is this new e/m coding thing happening? If so, when?
 
mid level lobbying is strong
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
mid level lobbying is strong

YES! and @SSdoc33 will fight you tooth and nail about that. Still, these things don't happen on accident. They happen because MD/DO's prefer to sit in their $h*t and be force-fed RVU pellets. Only through effective advocacy on behalf of all our patients can we turn this around...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Cmon guys. I get paid $60/hr to see the patients on my schedule (for my physician employer). My salary will not increase as a result of this. I know how much the physicians I work for make.... it is EXPONENTIALLY higher... and I dont begrudge that.... they deserve it. They attended medical school and I didn’t. Case closed. I still work hard for my boss for this, by comparison, “meager income”..... knowing that when I work hard he is more successful himself.... because that’s what a good employee does. An overwhelming majority of midlevels do not work independently (nor should they! I AGREE with you on this!)....so how would this benefit us as dependent employees? It doesn’t help us.... it helps our employers!

BTW, I find it suspicious that the image you posted failed to show other physician specialties/providers who will have increased reimbursement (besides mid levels): endocrinologists, IM, FP, urology, rheum, peds, immunology, otolaryngology, psychiatry, hem/onc, nephrology, neurology, obstetrics. Incidentally, reimbursement for CRNA’s will be markedly LOWER with this change.

I, additionally, find it curious that the economy is in danger of circling the drain because of this fabricated crisis surrounding covid (overall infection fatality ratio 0.65% per most recent cdc stat), and yet you manage to make this about THAT. I recently read that we should rejoice if ONLY 15% of restaurants permanently close due to shutdowns this year... because that’s a conservative figure. The most vulnerable jobs get picked off first.... but guaranteed if Fauci keeps playing the hysteria card and we continue to allow it, a several % points decrease in Medicare reimbursement for procedures will be the least of your/our worries.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I think that’s because they disproportionately see follow ups, which got increased reimbursement, while physicians see more new patients and do the vast majority of procedures, which have been cut.
Bingo. If you look at the physician specialties who got increases, its lots of us who don't do many procedures and have lots of long term patients (more follow ups, fewer new patients). FP, heme/onc, rheum, and endocrine all would get double-digit increases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
YES! and @SSdoc33 will fight you tooth and nail about that. Still, these things don't happen on accident. They happen because MD/DO's prefer to sit in their $h*t and be force-fed RVU pellets. Only through effective advocacy on behalf of all our patients can we turn this around...

What? I will?

keep my name out of your mouth if you are going to act like a fool
 
You always argue that physicians shouldn't be involved in advocacy.

i never argue that. why would i?

find a post that i said this, or admit your mistake.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
find a POST that i said physicians shouldnt be involved in advocacy.

you cant

Actions speak louder than words...

Will you oppose: 1) $O$ arbitrage; 2) Corona-triggers in employment contracts; 3) Hospital noncompetes on MD's; 4) Corporate practice of medicine by nominal nonprofits; 5) Ideologically based collectivist health care agendas...
 
Actions speak louder than words...

Will you oppose: 1) $O$ arbitrage; 2) Corona-triggers in employment contracts; 3) Hospital noncompetes on MD's; 4) Corporate practice of medicine by nominal nonprofits; 5) Ideologically based collectivist health care agendas...

come on, man, whats the matter with you? how does the above translate into I "always argue that physicians shouldn't be involved in advocacy"

i have come to realize that while you are a smart dude, you are pretty much an out-of-touch weirdo who most likely has a mild form of Asperger's
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 user
come on, man, whats the matter with you? how does the above translate into I "always argue that physicians shouldn't be involved in advocacy"

i have come to realize that while you are a smart dude, you are pretty much an out-of-touch weirdo who most likely has a mild form of Asperger's

Did it ever occur to you that I just enjoy antagonizing you?
 
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: 3 users
You two just get a room lol
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 6 users
I’ll take the pay cut but draw the line at permanent telehealth benefits. I absolutely hate those “visits”.

wait wut?
it ain't all about you, that's called vanity

2.2 Telehealth

CMS proposed several services to the Medicare telehealth services list during the public health emergency for the COVID-19 pandemic, including home visits for established patients and psychological and neuropsychological testing.

One of the expansions which ASIPP has worked tirelessly was telephone only. We are grateful to CMS that they retained not only the codes, but also the payment rates as if a patient was seen in the office.
 
i guess we have reached this point with you as well

:troll:

If you're not going to make STRONG arguments about issues, then why argue at all? Who wants tyranny by consensus? You ever sit in a med-staff meeting and realize that doctors are Sheeple. You need to have the courage to stand by your conviction. Argue the strong point, not the weak one.
 
If you're not going to make STRONG arguments about issues, then why argue at all? Who wants tyranny by consensus? You ever sit in a med-staff meeting and realize that doctors are Sheeple. You need to have the courage to stand by your conviction. Argue the strong point, not the weak one.

the only point I am arguing is that you are lying about my position.

you have no idea what i advocate for IRL.

all this other crap is non-sense. you want to be a crusader, go for it. dont drag me into your morass of idiocy
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Your words show me how angry and frustrated you are...
You would be mad if your party has a real chance for changing America but first you got Hilary, then veggie man. It’s like they want to lose again so they can complain for 4 more years of orange hole.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users
i was going to say thx AMA, but i was late
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Your words show me how angry and frustrated you are...

I have an idea:

Be a good person. Dont go out of your way to piss people off. It wont make you feel any better to put other people down. Especially when your premise is based on lies
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Thanks Trump...looks like you have Doctors back
 
this is the issue isn't it? We sit here and bicker about everything else rather than get one the same page.

Notice how everything went up for facility fees? while mostly negative stuff for pro fees? Hospitals are organized and lobby hard with a common goal.

Which organization can we all get behind with our support?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
thats even less recognized than the abpm. and its not pain specific
I posted them for Lobel.....their organization is muy loco....why I said "in Magenta"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
that sucks. are these cuts essentially set in stone?
 
what's the best way to do that? best society to support? SIS? calls to legislators ?
 
what's the best way to do that? best society to support? SIS? calls to legislators ?

ASIPP has worked the hardest to advocate for fair payment for services for pain patients. Support ASIPP.

And, yes, reach out to your elected representative's health policy staff. I literally have mine on speed dial. Offer your technical expertise and knowledge to help them understand the issues that impact care pain patients receive. In my experience, the R's are more receptive to calls from doctors than the D's, but you got to work both sides of the aisle. Both will start returning your calls when you show up for fundraising events, etc. They need help understanding the nuances of SOS, hospital monopolies, insurance company rationing of care, restraint of trade, the scope of practice, etc.

I completed a health policy fellowship, but you don't need to do that. You just need to call them and tell them what's on your mind. People on this forum will deny it, but most doctors are content to just sit in their Sh*tt and be force-fed RVU pellets instead of doing the hard advocacy work that needs to be done to ensure pain patients have access to pain treatment. When I attend town-halls, etc the doctors are outnumbered by the RN's, CRNA's, and Chiros by at least 5:1.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
However, facility fees in HOPD settings continue to increase despite less pay being directed to the physician... So, even though we are getting less for the same amount of work, the hospital is getting more. Im a glass half full kind of guy, but this sucks anyway you look at it. At the same time, the physician remains the driver of the facility fees to the hospital which continue to increase in value.

 
However, facility fees in HOPD settings continue to increase despite less pay being directed to the physician... So, even though we are getting less for the same amount of work, the hospital is getting more. Im a glass half full kind of guy, but this sucks anyway you look at it. At the same time, the physician remains the driver of the facility fees to the hospital which continue to increase in value.


How's your experience been getting hospitals to share the facility fee?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 user
Poor. that said, Im paid at the 75% percentile guaranteed for doing a lot or doing nothing, which I guess Im ok with for a few years until all this covid uncertainty blows over
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I’m ~9k wRvu so I wouldn’t say doing nothing, but I don’t have huge concerns about my production. My time working for the hospital has taught me one thing and that is I have essentially no control over my production
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Top