Could patients' picture improve pathologists' peformance?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Nilf

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2003
Messages
763
Reaction score
79

Members don't see this ad.
Check this out:

WSJ healthblog:

Israeli researchers found that the interpretation of CT scans improved when a snapshot of the patient automatically appeared in the images reviewed by the radiologist at a computerized work station.

Basically... You see a mugshot of the patient, and this increases your work performance.

We could use a similar study in pathology.

http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/12/02/personal-pictures-might-improve-radiology-results/
 

yaah

Boring
Moderator Emeritus
15+ Year Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2003
Messages
28,059
Reaction score
436
Maybe they should also add in pertinent things like, "The patient has three children and is their sole means of support." Or, some computer could sift through data and give the pathologist a user-appropriate factoid. If the pathologist is a Milwaukee Bucks fan, for example, the computer could tell the pathologist that in addition to having three children, the patient has season tickets to the Bucks.

To me, this all seems kind of questionable. What it implies is that physician performance and quality of work slides or declines when the patient becomes a "number" as opposed to a real person. While this may be true for some, I don't know what that really means. Seems too manipulative.
 

docbiohazard

Highly ranked amateur
10+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2007
Messages
609
Reaction score
0
To me, this all seems kind of questionable. What it implies is that physician performance and quality of work slides or declines when the patient becomes a "number" as opposed to a real person. While this may be true for some, I don't know what that really means. Seems too manipulative.

I find it totally believeable. You could probably replicate the results in Pathology.

DBH
 

docmike1983

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2008
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Pathologist are supposed to be objective. While knowledge of the patients clinical presentation is important, a picture of the patient is not. It allows for an emotional element which may unknowningly interfere with pathological diagnosis.
 

Nilf

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2003
Messages
763
Reaction score
79
Maybe they should also add in pertinent things like, "The patient has three children and is their sole means of support." Or, some computer could sift through data and give the pathologist a user-appropriate factoid. If the pathologist is a Milwaukee Bucks fan, for example, the computer could tell the pathologist that in addition to having three children, the patient has season tickets to the Bucks.

To me, this all seems kind of questionable. What it implies is that physician performance and quality of work slides or declines when the patient becomes a "number" as opposed to a real person. While this may be true for some, I don't know what that really means. Seems too manipulative.

Maybe it's not just a good idea after all. I have a strong suspicion that Yankee fans would report worse outcomes than controls.
 
Top