• Set Yourself Up For Success Webinar

    October 6, 2021 at 2 PM Eastern/11 AM Pacific
    SDN and Osmosis are teaming up to help you get set up for success this school year! We'll be covering study tips, healthy habits, and meeting mentors.

    Register Now!

  • Funniest Story on the Job Contest Starts Now!

    Contest starts now and ends September 27th. Winner will receive a special user banner and $10 Amazon Gift card!

    JOIN NOW
  • Site Updates Coming Next Week

    Site updates are coming next week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Click the button below to learn more!

    LEARN MORE

Could patients' picture improve pathologists' peformance?

Nilf

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Mar 20, 2003
745
62
306
Dancing on the graves of my enemies
  1. Attending Physician
Check this out:

WSJ healthblog:

Israeli researchers found that the interpretation of CT scans improved when a snapshot of the patient automatically appeared in the images reviewed by the radiologist at a computerized work station.

Basically... You see a mugshot of the patient, and this increases your work performance.

We could use a similar study in pathology.

http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/12/02/personal-pictures-might-improve-radiology-results/
 

yaah

Boring
Moderator Emeritus
15+ Year Member
Aug 15, 2003
28,059
432
616
Fixing in 10% neutral buffered formalin
  1. Attending Physician
Maybe they should also add in pertinent things like, "The patient has three children and is their sole means of support." Or, some computer could sift through data and give the pathologist a user-appropriate factoid. If the pathologist is a Milwaukee Bucks fan, for example, the computer could tell the pathologist that in addition to having three children, the patient has season tickets to the Bucks.

To me, this all seems kind of questionable. What it implies is that physician performance and quality of work slides or declines when the patient becomes a "number" as opposed to a real person. While this may be true for some, I don't know what that really means. Seems too manipulative.
 

docbiohazard

Highly ranked amateur
10+ Year Member
Mar 22, 2007
609
0
0
Biocontainment
  1. Resident [Any Field]
To me, this all seems kind of questionable. What it implies is that physician performance and quality of work slides or declines when the patient becomes a "number" as opposed to a real person. While this may be true for some, I don't know what that really means. Seems too manipulative.

I find it totally believeable. You could probably replicate the results in Pathology.

DBH
 
About the Ads

docmike1983

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Dec 9, 2008
42
0
0
  1. Medical Student
Pathologist are supposed to be objective. While knowledge of the patients clinical presentation is important, a picture of the patient is not. It allows for an emotional element which may unknowningly interfere with pathological diagnosis.
 

Nilf

Full Member
15+ Year Member
Mar 20, 2003
745
62
306
Dancing on the graves of my enemies
  1. Attending Physician
Maybe they should also add in pertinent things like, "The patient has three children and is their sole means of support." Or, some computer could sift through data and give the pathologist a user-appropriate factoid. If the pathologist is a Milwaukee Bucks fan, for example, the computer could tell the pathologist that in addition to having three children, the patient has season tickets to the Bucks.

To me, this all seems kind of questionable. What it implies is that physician performance and quality of work slides or declines when the patient becomes a "number" as opposed to a real person. While this may be true for some, I don't know what that really means. Seems too manipulative.

Maybe it's not just a good idea after all. I have a strong suspicion that Yankee fans would report worse outcomes than controls.
 
About the Ads
This thread is more than 12 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.