aight just took it- mixed feelings right now. did well on sciences but effed up on everything else- especially math. here it goes:
PA 19 75.2
QR 16 50.9
RC 19 53.3
BIO 23 97.6
GC 21 86.2
OC 22 89.8
TS 22 95.3
AA 20 84.0
overall wasn't really too bad. test was easier than most practice tests (topscore and kaplan)
Bio: used cliff's, destroyer, started out with kaplan- cliff's is money for this. that, and being a bio major and taking 16 upper division science units in your last semester i guess helped out too TS- 20,21, 22
GC- destroyer and kaplan- i think kaplan's sufficient TS- 19,19,20
OC- destroyer roadmaps and kaplan- TS- 23,20,23
PA- damn used cdp got 22-25. let's see. real dat- harder in keyholes(size not just shape), pattern folding, about the same angles, easier cube counting and hole punches. i really wasn't expecting this low score. keyholes took me longer than my normal time on cdp.
RC- thought i would do better on this too. first passage i tried to read everything first then switched methods on 2nd and 3rd to search and destroy- shoulda did that for the first one as well. TS- 20,19,21
QR- i just read the previous two posts too and they effed up as well. sheez. actually felt confident about this too- had cdm been getting 20-22.... word problems. nuff sed.
man, i shoulda accepted UOP's 6 year accelerated program out of high school, but oh well. anyways my total GPA's 3.3, science 3.0. i'm riding on my last semester full of upper div bio and getting a 3.7gpa to make somewhat of an impact. got 80 hours volunteering. about 50 shadowing. applied to UOP, UCSF, ASDOH, Loma Linda, and Western.
so tell me please, what do you think? UOP's my number one choice. are my QR, PA, and RC scores good enough? should I retake just because of those scores, and my chances at the other schools (except UCSF just applied there cuz its in the bay) ?
PA 19 75.2
QR 16 50.9
RC 19 53.3
BIO 23 97.6
GC 21 86.2
OC 22 89.8
TS 22 95.3
AA 20 84.0
overall wasn't really too bad. test was easier than most practice tests (topscore and kaplan)
Bio: used cliff's, destroyer, started out with kaplan- cliff's is money for this. that, and being a bio major and taking 16 upper division science units in your last semester i guess helped out too TS- 20,21, 22
GC- destroyer and kaplan- i think kaplan's sufficient TS- 19,19,20
OC- destroyer roadmaps and kaplan- TS- 23,20,23
PA- damn used cdp got 22-25. let's see. real dat- harder in keyholes(size not just shape), pattern folding, about the same angles, easier cube counting and hole punches. i really wasn't expecting this low score. keyholes took me longer than my normal time on cdp.
RC- thought i would do better on this too. first passage i tried to read everything first then switched methods on 2nd and 3rd to search and destroy- shoulda did that for the first one as well. TS- 20,19,21
QR- i just read the previous two posts too and they effed up as well. sheez. actually felt confident about this too- had cdm been getting 20-22.... word problems. nuff sed.
man, i shoulda accepted UOP's 6 year accelerated program out of high school, but oh well. anyways my total GPA's 3.3, science 3.0. i'm riding on my last semester full of upper div bio and getting a 3.7gpa to make somewhat of an impact. got 80 hours volunteering. about 50 shadowing. applied to UOP, UCSF, ASDOH, Loma Linda, and Western.
so tell me please, what do you think? UOP's my number one choice. are my QR, PA, and RC scores good enough? should I retake just because of those scores, and my chances at the other schools (except UCSF just applied there cuz its in the bay) ?