I was wondering how dental schools look at gpa because of the difficulty that varies between each school (for example UCSD vs UCSB). Is there a way that they take this into account or do they just only look at the GPA?
I was wondering how dental schools look at gpa because of the difficulty that varies between each school (for example UCSD vs UCSB). Is there a way that they take this into account or do they just only look at the GPA?
I would not worry much about undergrad schools in terms of GPA and reputation. But I heard that UCSD is one of a good dental school feeders in the country. They have very strong Pre-dental club with various opportunities to get involved in dental fields. I believe they even run 3 Free Dental clinics to serve the low income population in SD. And I see their students attending in big events like ADA, CDA... every year.I was wondering how dental schools look at gpa because of the difficulty that varies between each school (for example UCSD vs UCSB). Is there a way that they take this into account or do they just only look at the GPA?
I was wondering how dental schools look at gpa because of the difficulty that varies between each school (for example UCSD vs UCSB). Is there a way that they take this into account or do they just only look at the GPA?
Dental School admissions is inherently subjective in nature. Of course, admissions committees consider the institution of origin with regards to GPA figures for obvious reasons (though some tend to ignore these obvious reasons).To what extent this impacts a candidate depends on the individual and the complete applicant portrait. No one can say for sure. And anyone that suggests one thing or another, definitively, is simply speculating.
You will find those that vehemently argue that the school you went to does not matter are also the applicants/members that went to sub-par undergraduate programs or community colleges. Though this should not come as much of a surprise - inferiority complex, chip on a shoulder, who knows...
dental school admissions is inherently subjective in nature. Of course, admissions committees consider the institution of origin with regards to gpa figures for obvious reasons (though some tend to ignore these obvious reasons).to what extent this impacts a candidate depends on the individual and the complete applicant portrait. No one can say for sure. And anyone that suggests one thing or another, definitively, is simply speculating.
You will find those that vehemently argue that the school you went to does not matter are also the applicants/members that went to sub-par undergraduate programs or community colleges. Though this should not come as much of a surprise - inferiority complex, chip on a shoulder, who knows...
goutamk: I transferred from a 4 year CUNY university, to a mediocre 4 year institution because I was told by advisors that to get into health sciences you have to go somewhere "with a name." Now that I am completing my pre-reqs, I realize that it prolly didn't matter where I went because physics is physics, and bio is bio, and chem is chem, and most 4 year schools use the same (or similar) textbook and syllabus to teach the class. At the end of the day, we all take the DAT and each school has some calculation (that I agree is subjective to some point) that says you either got in, or you didnt. School name probably mattered more 20 years ago, but I think with the massive number of accredited schools that have popped up it's really hard to tell (ie, what about the US accredited international universities that many attend for study abroad or undergrad, which have American 4.0 grading systems, but they are much more lenient on their students? Like AUParis, AUBeirut, AUCairo, AURome, etc...).