- Joined
- Dec 15, 2008
- Messages
- 1,362
- Reaction score
- 43
Just something I've always wondered.
Just something I've always wondered.
Just something I've always wondered.
Depends on what you mean by steady hands? If you're a total klutz with your hands, surgery would be tough for you. If your hands shake when you're nervous, your first couple of years in surgery training will probably be tough: consider beta blockers for yourself pre-op. But eventually you'll stop being so nervous, so it could work. If you're average like most people, you'll be fine in general surgery. There are plenty of opportunities to steady your hands by placing your wrists/arms against the body wall or whatever. Things like vascular surgery where you're suturing up carotid arteries, might be more difficult. Although I remember one older chief of vascular surgery who had developed quite a bad resting tremor, but he was still excellent in the OR and the guy people trusted with the complicated cases.
I'm reading the book complications atm, and the author said that its never really looked at and doesn't reall matter. Although I guess if you have serious problems.. then.. you know.
<------ Gags...."The surgeon as a skilled artist and craftsman
Surgery, like karate, can represent "one of the highest expressions of the skilled use of the human body"(25). The surgeon must possess the virtuoso and intuitive ability of a concert pianist. He must command mastery over his fingers, and perform surgery with the finesse of a maestro. His eyes probe the surgical wound searching for and avoiding signs of danger, while his fingers polish and sculpt the tissues like a master craftsman. The patients life is literally in his hands.
Surgical performance can be measured on the Likert rating scale which contains 17 items to be graded by tutors, or with methods and instruments proposed by Kopta(26) and Spencer(27). In an analysis of operative skills, it was found that academic predictors did not correlate or correlated negatively with operative ratings(28). Conversely, neuro-psychologic test scores of non-verbal cognitive and psychomotor abilities showed a significant positive correlation with the ratings. These neuropsychologic tests provide measurements of relatively innate, non-verbal abilities including visual-spatial perception, motor sequencing and fine motor co-ordination, and stress tolerance." -- Soh, K B K, Singapore Medical Journal, Job Analysis, Appraisal and Performance Assessments of a Surgeon - A Multifaceted Approach:
http://www.sma.org.sg/smj/3904/articles/3904ra1.html
"The surgeon as a skilled artist and craftsman
Surgery, like karate, can represent "one of the highest expressions of the skilled use of the human body"(25). The surgeon must possess the virtuoso and intuitive ability of a concert pianist. He must command mastery over his fingers, and perform surgery with the finesse of a maestro. His eyes probe the surgical wound searching for and avoiding signs of danger, while his fingers polish and sculpt the tissues like a master craftsman. The patients life is literally in his hands.
Surgical performance can be measured on the Likert rating scale which contains 17 items to be graded by tutors, or with methods and instruments proposed by Kopta(26) and Spencer(27). In an analysis of operative skills, it was found that academic predictors did not correlate or correlated negatively with operative ratings(28). Conversely, neuro-psychologic test scores of non-verbal cognitive and psychomotor abilities showed a significant positive correlation with the ratings. These neuropsychologic tests provide measurements of relatively innate, non-verbal abilities including visual-spatial perception, motor sequencing and fine motor co-ordination, and stress tolerance." -- Soh, K B K, Singapore Medical Journal, Job Analysis, Appraisal and Performance Assessments of a Surgeon - A Multifaceted Approach:
http://www.sma.org.sg/smj/3904/articles/3904ra1.html
To the best of my knowledge, this is not tested in the US - there is no such screening pre residency, other than some incompetency that would show up in an MS3/4 rotation that would serve to discourage someone from pursuing surgery.
Frankly, it sounds like a lot of BS.
awesome book btw
Not to steal this thread, but I read somewhere that if your left handed it might be hard to be a surgeon since the tools are made for "rightys". Any truth to this?
Unless I'm missing something, 3 books in 7 years is not a book every 6 months. Is there something in particular that you don't like about the guy?Please, let us not blow up Atul Gawande on SDN. the literary world already does, not for his writing abilities but for the fact that he is a Harvard trained surgeon. He's publishing a new book every 6 months now? As a general rule, it is impossible to publish anything of quality that took only 6 months to produce.
At least he's not Dr. Oz though.
I think the more important thing is to be coordinated on the gross level. I, for example, am a klutz. If it is there, I will likely trip over it. One would think this could be a problem in surgery. Granted, I can control it if I am trying hard enough... I did work in a wet lab with small glass stuff for three years and didn't break TOO many test tubes, but it is exhausting for me if I'm trying not to trip and drop something important. I don't think I would want to deal with that every day for the rest of my life where the consequence could be far worse than the loss of my time(lab), and is instead the loss of someone's life(surgery).
Please, let us not blow up Atul Gawande on SDN. the literary world already does, not for his writing abilities but for the fact that he is a Harvard trained surgeon. He's publishing a new book every 6 months now? As a general rule, it is impossible to publish anything of quality that took only 6 months to produce.
At least he's not Dr. Oz though.
In regards to left handed surgeons: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/330/7481/10-f
Unless I'm missing something, 3 books in 7 years is not a book every 6 months. Is there something in particular that you don't like about the guy?
There is a minute fraction of peds surgery fellowships available relative to the general surgery pool, so they always get to pick the best.Some of these replies are unnerving.
I'm wondering how many of you have had serious surgery that actually required a lot of concentration and intense focus and attention to detail. . .or if you have had a child that needed this kind of person operating on him or her?
You don't know how serious and big of a deal it is until you need one, and you learn as a recovery nurse to trust the hands of certain surgeons over others--b/c you are the one recovering them. While there are many factors that can lead to problems and complications, I have learned how some surgeons trend in the OR and what that translates to for the patients. That's why I don't necessarily care if the surgeon operating on my loved one or me has the personality of an SOB, though it does add to unnecessary stress, etc. Mostly I want someone with the smarts, coordination, talent, overall surgical aptitude and skill--ESPECIALLY for a say my baby or child. On a baby, there is no room for sloppiness or heavy-handedness.
And truthfully, a lot of surgeons are pretty anal-retentive--highly fastidious. There's a reason for that too.
I have watched surgical residents and fellows have a very rough time of it in residency and fellowship. I get it, and that's why I cut them some slack when they are short tempered at times--to a point mind you. No one gets a free pass at being a total jack azz all the time--even if you have been run ragged and are so worn out you can barely see straight.
The truth is, not every can do it and do it exceedingly well, and in fact NOT everyone should do it. I don't pretend to think I possess the overall skill and talent and acumen needed for this. And I have one friend in particular who figured that very thing out during his residency. He switched to anesthesiology, and is doing quite well there and is very happy. It's not for everyone.
And truthfully, a lot of surgeons are pretty anal-retentive--highly fastidious. There's a reason for that too.
I have watched surgical residents and fellows have a very rough time of it in residency and fellowship. I get it, and that's why I cut them some slack when they are short tempered at times--to a point mind you. No one gets a free pass at being a total jack azz all the time--even if you have been run ragged and are so worn out you can barely see straight.
always exciting to see a nurse showing some balls...
my hands tremor when i try to do something w/ precision.. i talk to a doctor abt it and he said its not permanent.. the tremor is reducing since im exercising the muscles in the wrist and hand according to this advice..
You don't know how serious and big of a deal it is until you need one, and you learn as a recovery nurse to trust the hands of certain surgeons over others--b/c you are the one recovering them. While there are many factors that can lead to problems and complications, I have learned how some surgeons trend in the OR and what that translates to for the patients. That's why I don't necessarily care if the surgeon operating on my loved one or me has the personality of an SOB, though it does add to unnecessary stress, etc. Mostly I want someone with the smarts, coordination, talent, overall surgical aptitude and skill--ESPECIALLY for a say my baby or child. On a baby, there is no room for sloppiness or heavy-handedness.
I think you are partially right, partially wrong. There are most definitely some surgeons I trust over others - ones I would go to if I needed help and ones I wouldn't let near my loved ones.
Where I think you are wrong? It's not their HANDS I trust or distrust. It's their heads.
The surgeons I trust are the ones with excellent operative judgment. They are the ones who avoid problems/complications - but it's not through some miraculous concept of "good hands", rather it is from knowing what to do and what not to do, having patience and fastidiousness as you mention, and keeping a cool-head when things do go wrong.
I think you are partially right, partially wrong. There are most definitely some surgeons I trust over others - ones I would go to if I needed help and ones I wouldn't let near my loved ones.
Where I think you are wrong? It's not their HANDS I trust or distrust. It's their heads.
The surgeons I trust are the ones with excellent operative judgment. They are the ones who avoid problems/complications - but it's not through some miraculous concept of "good hands", rather it is from knowing what to do and what not to do, having patience and fastidiousness as you mention, and keeping a cool-head when things do go wrong.