L
LoveBeingHuman:)
Follow-up: do you think this represents a flaw in the medical school admissions process?
no. medical school admission process is like real life. those who are most successful are the ones who are best able to create a believable facade. just like in any other occupation.
I'd be lying if I said money didn't play a part in my decision to want to become a physician, but so what? I like everything about medicine besides a good portion of the patient population. It's interesting and stimulating. Also where I live I can be wealthy. Seems like a good fit for me.
I wouldn't say there is a flaw in the admissions system. I haven't met too many people in Med school who I think pursued it for the wrong reasons.
Follow-up: do you think this represents a flaw in the medical school admissions process?
This doesn't make sense. You say no to money-greedy then say the money-greedy are the most successful because of their believable facade.no. medical school admission process is like real life. those who are most successful are the ones who are best able to create a believable facade. just like in any other occupation.
I think the poster of this was replying to the follow-up question posed by OP, not the original question in the subject line.This doesn't make sense. You say no to money-greedy then say the money-greedy are the most successful because of their believable facade.
Essentially what you're saying is you're doing it for the money. You said it's a field that you love, but if the money isn't there then you would find another profession. Which is understandable considering we need money. However, people that practiced medicine back in the day, helping the sick with their limited abilities, practiced medicine with little money coming their way and worked a lot as well. Their reward? Helping their fellow man. Helping others brings the greatest pleasure and even helps you as a person.Well how do you define greedy?
Im currently puttting myself through increasingly unpleasant levels of hell in order to receive the training necessary to enter a field I love. When alls said and done my education will have cost close to half a million dollars, between private college and med school. In addition being an attending is significantly more demanding than a large proportion of jobs that adults hold.
So is it greedy to want to make enough money to buy a nice house, save well for retirement, and finance my own children's education the same way my parents did for me?
I care about helping people, but most people aren't saints. If the money isn't there, well go to another profession where our hard work and education would be rewarded.
Only way it makes sense.I think the poster of this was replying to the follow-up question posed by OP, not the original question in the subject line.
Wanting to have a good living is the base-line motivation for professionals anywhere.Follow-up: do you think this represents a flaw in the medical school admissions process?
Thats not a bad thing. People have their reasons, if it includes money, that's FINE. Just keep in perspective. IDK why this is such a big issue to some. Money is a point of consideration for me, but not in the top 5 for me. More like the top 10.I want money, I wanna own a nice German car, I want alot of things but most importantly I want to be a doctor. Money is definitely one of the reasons anyone would go through this.
Not gonna lie, it's like top 3 for me. I have no issue with thisThats not a bad thing. People have their reasons, if it includes money, that's FINE. Just keep in persecutive. IDK why this is such a big issue to some. Money is a point of consideration for me, but not in the top 5 for me. More like the top 10.
Do you think majority of physicians today are money-greedy?
For starters, I don't know what "money-greedy" means. But, based on the prior replies, I'll just replace it with "greedy" and respond accordingly.
Yes, the majority of physicians in the US are greedy. And I consider anyone who disagrees to be delusional, naive or lacking in exposure. Greedy or needy? I know of several physicians that need the money to pay off the looming debt they have. In the rare case I think intent changes things. I guess you can say I am naive, but like all of us we have our understanding. You have more experience in this field than I, but just putting my two cents in anyway.
The vast majority of human beings are greedy. Correspondingly, the vast majority of those in the US are greedy and given that physicians are a sub-set of this, it follows that the majority will be greedy. I agree.
The further that I go in medicine and the more people, physicians and non-physicians, that I come across, the more I come to the conclusion that there is very little different between physicians and non-physicians. They mirror the general population extremely well. Name an attribute that can be applied to the population that they are selected from and dollars to donuts it can be applied to physicians as a group. I agree 100% with this. The idea that going through Med-school makes you special is silly. You are simply realized the impertinence of being persistent and focused and used those to your benefit as a Pre-Med. (Sorry you are not smarter for going though a pre-med program. You are simply a human and another student. Keeping yourself grounded is important. )
Follow-up: do you think this represents a flaw in the medical school admissions process?
Whether or not this is a flaw depends on what you think the goal of medical school admissions is. I don't think that anyone will question that altruism and lack of "greed" is a positive quality in a physician. But, I also don't think that you will find enough otherwise qualified students to fill your medical school classes. For starters the ability to find them is hard, but more than that, I just don't think there are that many out there.
As @DrHart said, " The more interesting question would be.... if there was a hypothetical salary cap of 100k, how many people would still go through with it." I don't think that making money is a problem. (I think that Thoreau and the post Civil War Nationalism had a great part of changing the view of income levels... But that's just me.) Rabbi Sacks talks about the idea of one making money so that you can do good works. I don't think that stuffing it all away is wise, nor giving it all away. Find the balance point. People will think you are doing it wrong... giving or not giving. So, do what you want, just be the best doctor you can be... that is what it is all about.
I deleted my other thoughts on the topic knowing they will be wildly unpopular and don't have the energy to go further than what is above.
How many doctors would agree to treat poor patients on a somewhat regular basis without charging them (many doctors can do this without a hit to their salary)? Not many.
How many medical school applicants would be able to say they won't treat patients who are poor because they can't get money, and still get in? Probably zero.
The point is that I don't really see doctors today being what medical schools today want to produce.
Yeah, man.
Reject the doctors' professional autonomy and usher in the equitopia.
Pointing out something exists doesn't mean I agree or disagree with it.
Read my post again and try to understand the point I'm trying to make.
If you can't, try again
rofl, more like 4-8 dollars in some casesI think its reasonable to be compensated well after spending 3-7 years making essentially $15 an hour with a doctorate degree
I'd say 95% of the students I get are the students I want. I would have no problem with them touching my family.How many doctors would agree to treat poor patients on a somewhat regular basis without charging them (many doctors can do this without a hit to their salary)? Not many.
How many medical school applicants would be able to say they won't treat patients who are poor because they can't get money, and still get in? Probably zero.
The point is that I don't really see doctors today being what medical schools today want to produce.
Consider the sourceQuality Pre allo thread
Consider the source
Yeah, well, its a good topic to consider. I think it made many to think about this aspect of medicine. IMO at least.This is a totally irrelevant and nonsensical question. I give the troll 7/10. Many people were caught in the web.
There are obviously doctors who only went into it because of the prestige and the money. Most of those don't survive. Some do. I don't think that means we should assume the majority are greedy. This kind of sentiment erodes confidence in physicians and makes people into anti-vaxxers.Yeah, well, its a good topic to consider. I think it made many to think about this aspect of medicine. IMO at least.
Essentially what you're saying is you're doing it for the money. You said it's a field that you love, but if the money isn't there then you would find another profession. Which is understandable considering we need money. However, people that practiced medicine back in the day, helping the sick with their limited abilities, practiced medicine with little money coming their way and worked a lot as well. Their reward? Helping their fellow man. Helping others brings the greatest pleasure and even helps you as a person.
I'm just saying to me it seems like you care more about the money than the medicine, because if there was no money then you wouldn't practice medicine. No it's not greedy to buy a house and support a family, but some people practice medicine or think about medicine for the money and not the medicine. Also, I think the OP phrased the question wrong, because it isn't greedy, rather money is the motive. Which, again, is fine because a job is a job.
How many doctors would agree to treat poor patients on a somewhat regular basis without charging them (many doctors can do this without a hit to their salary)? Not many.
How many medical school applicants would be able to say they won't treat patients who are poor because they can't get money, and still get in? Probably zero.
The point is that I don't really see doctors today being what medical schools today want to produce.
no. medical school admission process is like real life. those who are most successful are the ones who are best able to create a believable facade. just like in any other occupation.
How many doctors would agree to treat poor patients on a somewhat regular basis without charging them (many doctors can do this without a hit to their salary)? Not many.
How many medical school applicants would be able to say they won't treat patients who are poor because they can't get money, and still get in? Probably zero.
The point is that I don't really see doctors today being what medical schools today want to produce.
Essentially what you're saying is you're doing it for the money. You said it's a field that you love, but if the money isn't there then you would find another profession. Which is understandable considering we need money. However, people that practiced medicine back in the day, helping the sick with their limited abilities, practiced medicine with little money coming their way and worked a lot as well. Their reward? Helping their fellow man. Helping others brings the greatest pleasure and even helps you as a person.
I'm just saying to me it seems like you care more about the money than the medicine, because if there was no money then you wouldn't practice medicine. No it's not greedy to buy a house and support a family, but some people practice medicine or think about medicine for the money and not the medicine. Also, I think the OP phrased the question wrong, because it isn't greedy, rather money is the motive. Which, again, is fine because a job is a job.
Ironically, the most believable facade is often real life. When I look at my class, there are 10 "wow you really deserve to be here" types for every bull$hit artistno. medical school admission process is like real life. those who are most successful are the ones who are best able to create a believable facade. just like in any other occupation.