M
moops
I am convinced that I was rejected from a few schools because I had lost my mojo for several weeks.
What do you do when you lose your mojo?
What do you do when you lose your mojo?
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2003
- Messages
- 295
- Reaction score
- 0
Everybody has mojo.... when it's working, you can feel the will of the world and weave yourself into it.. when it's not working, your shoes feel like they're different sizes, and the sky looks crooked and dark..
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2002
- Messages
- 306
- Reaction score
- 0
Sorry, nouveau liberalists ... females cannot have MOJO. This is essentially related to another good statement, often misinterpreted by new age fools.
WARNING, the next statement is lewd. Please do not read on if you would like to keep your virginal eyes. Thanks you.
Women don't f*ck, they get f*cked.
😱 😡
Gumshoe
ps- you guys are the best
WARNING, the next statement is lewd. Please do not read on if you would like to keep your virginal eyes. Thanks you.
Women don't f*ck, they get f*cked.
😱 😡
Gumshoe
ps- you guys are the best
M
moops
gonads
*bump*
*bump*
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2003
- Messages
- 23
- Reaction score
- 0
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2003
- Messages
- 23
- Reaction score
- 0
Giddy up!!
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2002
- Messages
- 126
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey, I found my mojo
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2000
- Messages
- 83
- Reaction score
- 0
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2003
- Messages
- 167
- Reaction score
- 3
so is it male or female mojo that makes her walk funny when we're done?
(you know what they say about guys with long arms)😉
(you know what they say about guys with long arms)😉
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2002
- Messages
- 306
- Reaction score
- 0
Gumshoe, innocent? Hehehe, perhaps, but the fact remains that you're naive and innocent, HouseHead, if you don't believe what I've formerly stated.
Ahhh women, I love them. But I don't enjoy it when they deny the absolute laws of nature ...
Is that picture Daisy from Dukes of Hazzard? If so, nice ...
Gumshoe
😛
Ahhh women, I love them. But I don't enjoy it when they deny the absolute laws of nature ...
Is that picture Daisy from Dukes of Hazzard? If so, nice ...
Gumshoe
😛
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2002
- Messages
- 284
- Reaction score
- 0
Ok here is another perspective....
Mojo is required for anything we do. When we aspire for something we got to love it and feel excited about it. I think the interviewer wants to see if you are going to enjoy doing it or not. they want to see that you got that feeling [mojo] in you that will make you do it [the work] and that you will feel satisfaction. After a certain level [education] attitude matters more that aptitude as our attitude is something that shows our committment to get into it and get along with it with excitement which makes us happy and everyone else.
Just like physical thing....
Well....what do you think....😉
Mojo is required for anything we do. When we aspire for something we got to love it and feel excited about it. I think the interviewer wants to see if you are going to enjoy doing it or not. they want to see that you got that feeling [mojo] in you that will make you do it [the work] and that you will feel satisfaction. After a certain level [education] attitude matters more that aptitude as our attitude is something that shows our committment to get into it and get along with it with excitement which makes us happy and everyone else.
Just like physical thing....
Well....what do you think....😉
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2000
- Messages
- 525
- Reaction score
- 0
Originally posted by Gumshoe
Women don't f*ck, they get f*cked.
😱 😡
Gumshoe
ps- you guys are the best
Then you have not seen women ride the bolognae pony! 😍
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2001
- Messages
- 26
- Reaction score
- 0
I am extremely offended by this statement. Ladies...are we really going to stand by and let ourselves be openly demeaned?? I for one am not and I encourage everyone who agrees with me to speak up and make it clear that this kind of language is not OK.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2003
- Messages
- 23
- Reaction score
- 0
kristen....you gotta lighten up. a defensive attitude doesn't get you anywhere in this day and age. you gotta converse on their level. this is just casual banter, just for fun. sex is natural, t'isnt taboo to talk about it.
don't get mad at gumshoe. it's not his fault he's ignorant to the spectrum of women out there. what can i say? like i said before, he's never been to texas. my guy friends always joke around: "save a horse, ride a cowboy. "
cheers.😀
don't get mad at gumshoe. it's not his fault he's ignorant to the spectrum of women out there. what can i say? like i said before, he's never been to texas. my guy friends always joke around: "save a horse, ride a cowboy. "
cheers.😀
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2002
- Messages
- 306
- Reaction score
- 0
Ok, a lesson in grammar for you. In the above statement, what is the direct object? That's right ladies and gentlemen --- it's the bologna pony, in this example, thus supporting my thesis from before.
I don't have to repeat it. Don't stand for it, Kristin. It is unappropriate language. But is it true? Sure is....
Gumshoe
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2002
- Messages
- 2,155
- Reaction score
- 13
as a junior rat gynecologist, perhaps some will appreciate my opinion:
I have this male breeder, Borris. He's so full of mojo, it's hard to be around him. The ladies (rats) always get pregnant with him. So anyway, one day I put this sassy female in there with him, and sure enough in the morning she's pregnant (presumably....she did have "Borris juice" in her, so to speak). But Borris had one hell of a chunk of his ear bit off. Now, if that female rat doesn't have MOJO, then I don't know what we're talking about. Maybe you want to call it GOJO or FOJO, but whatever it is, she's got it as far as I'm concerned. So while the female pregnant may not have technically been f8cked, he sure did a number on ol' Borris. I bet he *felt* f8cked. Mojo is an attitude thing. Anybody who's watched Austin Powers must realize this.
I have this male breeder, Borris. He's so full of mojo, it's hard to be around him. The ladies (rats) always get pregnant with him. So anyway, one day I put this sassy female in there with him, and sure enough in the morning she's pregnant (presumably....she did have "Borris juice" in her, so to speak). But Borris had one hell of a chunk of his ear bit off. Now, if that female rat doesn't have MOJO, then I don't know what we're talking about. Maybe you want to call it GOJO or FOJO, but whatever it is, she's got it as far as I'm concerned. So while the female pregnant may not have technically been f8cked, he sure did a number on ol' Borris. I bet he *felt* f8cked. Mojo is an attitude thing. Anybody who's watched Austin Powers must realize this.
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2001
- Messages
- 26
- Reaction score
- 0
Actually, no, I don't think that I should lighten up at all. I think that the fact that most people just let statements like this slide is what allows the ideas and imagery of women getting "f*cked" permeate mainstream society. In case you haven't noticed people often say things like " i got f*cked" or "i got scr*wed" when what they really mean is that they got taken advantage of or used or otherwise got the raw end of a deal. I do not appreciate the comment made by gumshoe and I am not going to let it slide.
I agree very much that sex is natural and that it isn't taboo to talk about it. I think that talking about sex is extremely healthy and is something we should all be able to feel comfortable doing. It's statements such as the one made by gumshoe that produce a hostile environment in which many women may have a difficult time forming healthy attitudes about their own sexuality.
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2002
- Messages
- 43
- Reaction score
- 0
I couldn't agree more with what Kristin_Le said. There really is no reason why something like this should just be brushed off and ignored. That really gets no one anywhere. At least by confronting the situation someone's attitudes might change (doubtful though after seeing GumShoe's immature drivel), but if nothing is done then there is absolutely no chance that things could change.
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2002
- Messages
- 306
- Reaction score
- 0
Kristin, I understand where you are coming from. Hang on ONE second though. This is a message board . Clearly people didn't come to this very thread for advice on how to treat women, etc. So please --- we're just having stupid fun.
If you want me to get serious, I will. I think it is very ironic that you point out that women get "taken advantage of or used" because (assuming no drugs are involved) I would say the countless examples of that happening are the fault of the particular woman herself. Sorry to make the rain come down even further. If this incenses you, think about it. There is good reason why many people believe that "victims" are in fact victims because in many ways they want to be. I mean, how many scum bag guys get hot girlfriends that treat them like crap and they keep coming back for more? Talk to me. I know this happens a ton and why? ... because these women don't think they are worthy of good treatment. This is where the "nice guy" gets "f*cked" because of female idiocy.
As for hostile environments, just quit it. If these females got their heads out of their asses they would realize that a) they aren't meant to be promiscuous b) they should know themselves better and not let anyone else define them. I'm not saying guys are "meant to be promiscuous" but the whole point of the bullsh*t that I have been spewing is directly related to the fact that females nowadays think they DO f*ck, that they should do it in the same manner that guys do, look at it that same way, and it is just flat out BULLSH*T
Holla, if it were a perfect world, everyone would be monogamous. But some people aren't that smart ...
These are my thoughts.
Gumshoe
If you want me to get serious, I will. I think it is very ironic that you point out that women get "taken advantage of or used" because (assuming no drugs are involved) I would say the countless examples of that happening are the fault of the particular woman herself. Sorry to make the rain come down even further. If this incenses you, think about it. There is good reason why many people believe that "victims" are in fact victims because in many ways they want to be. I mean, how many scum bag guys get hot girlfriends that treat them like crap and they keep coming back for more? Talk to me. I know this happens a ton and why? ... because these women don't think they are worthy of good treatment. This is where the "nice guy" gets "f*cked" because of female idiocy.
As for hostile environments, just quit it. If these females got their heads out of their asses they would realize that a) they aren't meant to be promiscuous b) they should know themselves better and not let anyone else define them. I'm not saying guys are "meant to be promiscuous" but the whole point of the bullsh*t that I have been spewing is directly related to the fact that females nowadays think they DO f*ck, that they should do it in the same manner that guys do, look at it that same way, and it is just flat out BULLSH*T
Holla, if it were a perfect world, everyone would be monogamous. But some people aren't that smart ...
These are my thoughts.
Gumshoe
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2001
- Messages
- 26
- Reaction score
- 0
Gumshoe I'm glad that you responded. I know that your comment was not meant to be any sort of advice about how men should treat women or anything like that...I know that language like that has become commonplace...I guess I'm just trying to raise a little awareness about how we should take care to consider the real implications of what we are saying.
I think that you sort of misunderstood my post. I wasn't saying specifically that women get "taken advantage of or used" but was just pointing out that the same language used to describe those scenarios (getting "f*cked") is the same language that is used to describe women's role in heterosexual relationships. Living in a world that makes such close comparisons between the two situations can make it hard for women, particularly developing girls becoming more aware of their own sexuality, to develop healthy attitudes and ideas about sexual relationships.
I would agree that lots of women end up in unhealthy relationships, although I was not talking about that at all in my previous post. Since you brought it up though, I think that it is oversimplifying the situation to say that when women stay in these relationships it is their own fault. Women who stay in unhealthy or abusive relationships often have very low self-esteem and very unhealthy attitudes about sex. The language that we use to describe women's position in society and their role in sexuality does not seem important on a case by case basis, but taken as a whole, the negative language women might hear throughout their lifetime can have a significant negative impact.
As far as your final comment about promiscuity, I guess I am not quite sure what point you are trying to make. It seems as though you are advocating a double standard as far as what is an acceptable number of sexual partners for men vs. women. If so this is a blatantly sexist attitude and if you believe in equality and non-discrimination, you might want to give this idea a bit more thought.
I think that you sort of misunderstood my post. I wasn't saying specifically that women get "taken advantage of or used" but was just pointing out that the same language used to describe those scenarios (getting "f*cked") is the same language that is used to describe women's role in heterosexual relationships. Living in a world that makes such close comparisons between the two situations can make it hard for women, particularly developing girls becoming more aware of their own sexuality, to develop healthy attitudes and ideas about sexual relationships.
I would agree that lots of women end up in unhealthy relationships, although I was not talking about that at all in my previous post. Since you brought it up though, I think that it is oversimplifying the situation to say that when women stay in these relationships it is their own fault. Women who stay in unhealthy or abusive relationships often have very low self-esteem and very unhealthy attitudes about sex. The language that we use to describe women's position in society and their role in sexuality does not seem important on a case by case basis, but taken as a whole, the negative language women might hear throughout their lifetime can have a significant negative impact.
As far as your final comment about promiscuity, I guess I am not quite sure what point you are trying to make. It seems as though you are advocating a double standard as far as what is an acceptable number of sexual partners for men vs. women. If so this is a blatantly sexist attitude and if you believe in equality and non-discrimination, you might want to give this idea a bit more thought.
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2000
- Messages
- 525
- Reaction score
- 0
Originally posted by Gumshoe
Ok, a lesson in grammar for you. In the above statement, what is the direct object? That's right ladies and gentlemen --- it's the bologna pony,
Gumshoe
Well next time you want to teach you might want to learn a few things yourself:
1) The difference between spelling and grammar
2) The difference between intentionally miswritting a word and not knowing the difference between a grammatical error and a word spelled wrong.
😎
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2002
- Messages
- 306
- Reaction score
- 0
Dr. Perez, what the F**K are you talking about. That last statement makes zero sense, because it has nothing to do with spelling, or errors, and yes, a direct object is part of a grammatical system, jackass. In fact, like I said, Mr. Cynic, the pony is the direct object in your previous post. I cannot stand such insolence! I haven't time for your idiocy.
With regard to more important matters, Kristin, I give you kudos for your last post. Very well done.
My last thought is the one you mentioned about double standards. Clearly, there are double standards in life. Don't let this liberal idealism shade your thinking. Point in case. Men are stronger than women and are better athletes. It's just a fact of life. I just hate it when people try to make the sexes the same. Yes, they should be equal, but not the SAME. It's a huge distinction.
Let me clear things up and say that I don't believe that multiple partners is acceptable, at all, but we realize it happens. Women should not have even the slightest resemblance to men in their prospects, because these two outlooks are TOTALLY different by nature. I guess what I'm saying is that on a certain level it is more understandable that a guy would be promiscuous, although I don't condone it. He is made that way by a nature, while the female really isn't at all (this could diverge into a biological history argument). But as I've said, the truly enlightened will keep it monogamous. In any case, I hate bullsh*t ideologies set forth by liberal thinkers of the modern era. Acting like everyone is equal, if we do stuff wrong it's anything but our fault, it's other people's faults, etc. ... but I digress, I'm rambling
Cheers
Gumshoe
With regard to more important matters, Kristin, I give you kudos for your last post. Very well done.
My last thought is the one you mentioned about double standards. Clearly, there are double standards in life. Don't let this liberal idealism shade your thinking. Point in case. Men are stronger than women and are better athletes. It's just a fact of life. I just hate it when people try to make the sexes the same. Yes, they should be equal, but not the SAME. It's a huge distinction.
Let me clear things up and say that I don't believe that multiple partners is acceptable, at all, but we realize it happens. Women should not have even the slightest resemblance to men in their prospects, because these two outlooks are TOTALLY different by nature. I guess what I'm saying is that on a certain level it is more understandable that a guy would be promiscuous, although I don't condone it. He is made that way by a nature, while the female really isn't at all (this could diverge into a biological history argument). But as I've said, the truly enlightened will keep it monogamous. In any case, I hate bullsh*t ideologies set forth by liberal thinkers of the modern era. Acting like everyone is equal, if we do stuff wrong it's anything but our fault, it's other people's faults, etc. ... but I digress, I'm rambling
Cheers
Gumshoe
M
moops
what happened to "Mojo"
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2002
- Messages
- 415
- Reaction score
- 5
Gumshoe, no matter how much my next statement is gonna totally piss off a lot of chicks, you are right about one thing. Men and women are different. They are physically different (obviously) and also think differently. This is a biological, evolutionary FACT. Men can do things that women cant (like Fock)🙂 and women can do things that guys cant. This is neither good nor bad, it is just the way it is. Getting all defensive about it is rather pointless...dont ya think? For all of you would would like to be further enlightened there is an excellent book called "Why men dont listen and women cant read maps". It is not sexist bullsh*t but a scientific book that expains the differences between the sexes. I have forever changed my views after reading it.
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2002
- Messages
- 1,104
- Reaction score
- 7
Hi everyone, welcome to SDN, where we can start a flame war over ANYthing. Please make yourself at home and find some poop to fling at someone. Or maybe we could find a topic that nobody could fight over, hmmmm, how about kittens and butterflies, they're lovely.
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2003
- Messages
- 173
- Reaction score
- 0
Obviously this guys hasn't been meeting the right kind of women!!
Haven't you heard...we hit our peak at 30! Perhaps while you have been going to the keg parties...you could have been having some real sex with some real women, who know what they are doing. Food for thought. Go for experienced women, and perhaps you will be enlightened.
CC
PS: Ever heard of a strap on??
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2002
- Messages
- 284
- Reaction score
- 0
lil pook said it..
Men and women are complementary to each other. Thaey are not rivals. Sometimes I think women got so much. They create lives in their wombs.
So ....think about it...
😎
Men and women are complementary to each other. Thaey are not rivals. Sometimes I think women got so much. They create lives in their wombs.
So ....think about it...
😎
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2002
- Messages
- 306
- Reaction score
- 0
Lil' Pook got at exactly what I was talking about. Nicely done, pook. CCHieb's, I don't discount your input, either. You are right! Yes, women change tremendously in all facets when they hit 30. As for the strap-on comment, I laughed my ass off, but it's inescapable that even in that deranged scenario the strapER isn't getting any pleasure. The strapEE might be, and they ARE getting f***ed ... but that strapER is not fuc*ing ...
Haha, later on peeps
Gummi
Haha, later on peeps
Gummi
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2002
- Messages
- 433
- Reaction score
- 3
Oh, how little you know about strap ons...
Again I say, Gumshoe, you poor, sweet, innocent thing... 😉
But for real, these "facts" you present are very black-or-white, and do not allow for the continuum that is human gender and sexuality. Generalization are not law- If they were, my SAT math score would have been a LOT lower than it was!
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2003
- Messages
- 173
- Reaction score
- 0
Househead...do you think that he is challenging us? 😕
Gumshoe...in the name of science we may have to perform some tagteam research on your ass, and you can tell us if we (the strapER's) are enjoying ourselves.
Gumshoe...in the name of science we may have to perform some tagteam research on your ass, and you can tell us if we (the strapER's) are enjoying ourselves.
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2002
- Messages
- 6,792
- Reaction score
- 7
i can read a map. i actually really like reading maps. 😀
and pssst: to those folks who think the strapER does not have any pleasure.... i vote w/househead in the
dept... don'tchaknow that the "strap on" comes in many varieties ... even some that go both ways?? i.e. ones having two "members." 😉 wow, some even vibrate! *gasp* poor sheltered innocent. keep on thinking the only fun for a woman is having something stuck in her.- Joined
- Sep 23, 2002
- Messages
- 306
- Reaction score
- 0
This post is getting deranged and even more disgusting by the minute ... thank the Lord I don't know what you guys look like ... hehehe
Yes, "stuck in her" notice that the "she" in this example is the indirect object and the item (member) is the direct object. It's inescapable, the female always gets F'ed
Haha, I get the last laugh but only because I'm right
Anyway, enough of this. But I must say it was amusing. Do females really please themselves though? I asked a girl I knew and she said "Way more than you think" but I just have a hard time believing that they go at it with any frequency NEAR men. Yet another difference, but a plus on the woman's side.
Cheers,
Gumshoe
Yes, "stuck in her" notice that the "she" in this example is the indirect object and the item (member) is the direct object. It's inescapable, the female always gets F'ed
Haha, I get the last laugh but only because I'm right
Anyway, enough of this. But I must say it was amusing. Do females really please themselves though? I asked a girl I knew and she said "Way more than you think" but I just have a hard time believing that they go at it with any frequency NEAR men. Yet another difference, but a plus on the woman's side.
Cheers,
Gumshoe
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2003
- Messages
- 1,541
- Reaction score
- 8
um i think they go at it more often than men...they are more discrete, and it's not the same type of experience as for men.
Similar threads
