- Joined
- Sep 28, 2006
- Messages
- 221
- Reaction score
- 0
Wow, finally done.
Here are my real DAT score.
PAT 25
QR 29
RC 19
Bio 19
G chem 19
O chem 20
TS 20
AA 21
Not as high as other SDNers
but I am happy with the result.
Kaplan - yea i took the course. If i were you i'll save up that money for applications
not that their program is bad, but there are other resources that are cheaper and more helpful than the expensive course. If you don't have to worry about the $ then i would say go for it because it actually makes you study.
but the blue book was helpful.
Destroyer - the best of all. it's definitely a GOOD resource VERY VERY GOOD.
Topscore - pretty good to know where you are...biology wasn't as comparable as other sections though...gen chem and o chem were pretty comparable. PAT was BAD!!!! QR was similar. Many people said reading is wayyyyyy easy compared to the real one, but i thought they are similar in difficulty. It was just that real one had more tone, main idea questions.
Achiever - I got this like few days before my test, so I couldn't utilize it as much as other materials, but I could tell Achiever was way too harder than the real one.
Crack dat pat - this is all you need for PAT section like other SDNers said.
Crack dat math - When I took DAT last year, timing was the biggest problem in QR section, and this thing helped me a BUNCH. I am quite happy with my QR score.
Here are my practice scores
Crack dat pat
test 1 = 21
test 2 = 22
test 3 = 18
test 4 = 21
test 5 = 23
test 6 = 22
test 7 = 21
test 8 = 20
Angles and hole punches are easier on the real one, and other sections are pretty similar
Crack dat math
test 1 = 20
test 2 = 22
test 3 = 28
test 4 = 22
test 5 = 22
test 6 = 23
real one was easier than crack dat.
my topscore scores are not available right now, but practice score was much lower than the real score.
I feel like i'm repeating what other people said, but i hope this is helpful to someone
Good luck everyone
Here are my real DAT score.
PAT 25
QR 29
RC 19
Bio 19
G chem 19
O chem 20
TS 20
AA 21
Not as high as other SDNers
but I am happy with the result.
Kaplan - yea i took the course. If i were you i'll save up that money for applications
not that their program is bad, but there are other resources that are cheaper and more helpful than the expensive course. If you don't have to worry about the $ then i would say go for it because it actually makes you study.
but the blue book was helpful.
Destroyer - the best of all. it's definitely a GOOD resource VERY VERY GOOD.
Topscore - pretty good to know where you are...biology wasn't as comparable as other sections though...gen chem and o chem were pretty comparable. PAT was BAD!!!! QR was similar. Many people said reading is wayyyyyy easy compared to the real one, but i thought they are similar in difficulty. It was just that real one had more tone, main idea questions.
Achiever - I got this like few days before my test, so I couldn't utilize it as much as other materials, but I could tell Achiever was way too harder than the real one.
Crack dat pat - this is all you need for PAT section like other SDNers said.
Crack dat math - When I took DAT last year, timing was the biggest problem in QR section, and this thing helped me a BUNCH. I am quite happy with my QR score.
Here are my practice scores
Crack dat pat
test 1 = 21
test 2 = 22
test 3 = 18
test 4 = 21
test 5 = 23
test 6 = 22
test 7 = 21
test 8 = 20
Angles and hole punches are easier on the real one, and other sections are pretty similar
Crack dat math
test 1 = 20
test 2 = 22
test 3 = 28
test 4 = 22
test 5 = 22
test 6 = 23
real one was easier than crack dat.
my topscore scores are not available right now, but practice score was much lower than the real score.
I feel like i'm repeating what other people said, but i hope this is helpful to someone
Good luck everyone