The British system of education doesn't allow for a "doctoral level" MD to be awarded, so they're given the MBBS or MBChB (Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery), which is a 6-year course, but effectively their degrees are at the US' "doctoral level" for medicine.
As for their only recognizing one of two US medical degrees, that's their decision to make. It's their country. They've long since established schools of osteopathy modeled after the US system, but to them it's just that -- osteopathy, OMT stuff -- not osteopathic medicine. How can you expect them to recognize a US trained DO as a full physician when their own DOs (who, by the way, are Diplomates of Osteopathy, as Still had originally intended, and not Doctors of Osteopathy/Osteopathic Medicine) are anything but? To allow US trained DOs to practice in these countries would potentially open the door to practicing medicine without a license by some unscrupulous DOs on that side.
What the AOA should probably do is try and bring the British osteopathic schools up to speed on the changes within osteopathic medicine. I'm sure that if those countries begin accepting DOs as fully-trained physicians, they'll begin accepting US trained DOs.
So does anyone know how relations are between DCs and DOs in the UK?
Tim of New York City.