But you did go DO to save effort, time, and/or money (as I had previously said, as those are the usual reasons for one choosing DO). You may not view that as taking the easy way out, but the sad fact is that some people do. No one has the time (nor the care, unfortunately) to sit around hearing your reasons for choosing DO over MD and whether or not they are justified. Instead, people 1. Won't know what you are; 2. Will assume that you were not smart enough to gain an MD acceptance (although this is sometimes not the case); 3. Will assume that you took the easy way out.
I don't start until this fall, but there were students in my sister's MD class who were once homeless, raised two kids independently, grew up in foster care, etc., and they found a way. If the way they took was hard, what is the term for your way? The more practical way? That's great. There is nothing wrong with that. As I said previously, I also applied DO (my favorite doctor is a DO). I was simply telling the previous poster to have more pride in the degree that he/she chose and to stop fantasizing about a 'switch'.
And let's not assume that everyone needs to spend mega bucks for graduate school/SMP or that one needs a 30 on the MCAT to gain admission. I myself have an equivalent of a ~28/29 and have two MD acceptances (non-urm). There are other factors at play, factors that can be cultivated through hard work doing activities that are free of charge. Married, kids, late bloomer, other life circumstance in the way? Again, life decisions can have long lasting impacts. This profession, unfortunately, is not very 'forgiving'; especially when there are people who came from worse to achieve an MD.
I follow your posts and respect essentially everything that you say, so please do not feel as though I am attacking you. It's simply a difference of opinion. DO schools are easier to get into. When one is not accepted to MD school, they pick the easier option....which some term the 'easier' path or the 'easy' way out.