Has anyone purchased his 5 pillars course?
Hey I'm in dedicated for Step 1 right now and I heard from a guy who knows a guy that you're selling the secret to getting a Step score of 300 with 5 days prep?I would agree and for just $49.95 I can show you the 6 ways to avoid being taken advantage as a desperate premed.
But wait, there's more. Act now and I will also send you the 5 mistakes every premed make when taking advice from the internet absolutely free,
just pay separate shipping, handling, dealer prep, convenience fee, drying cleaning bill, and foreign transaction fees for the Cayman Islands.
And for only $995.95 get our guaranteed acceptance package to New York Medical University*. Don't forget our amazing 30 day trial offer: if you dont bring us to trial in 30 days, we'll be amazed. Now this is the old professor signing off.
And ignore the dozens of FREE links below with information directly from AMCAS/AAMC. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain
*(of Curacao, not to be confused with New York Medical College or New York University. Sadly a very real place)
Can you elaborate?I have discovered that some of our applicants have used expensive advice (from him) that I found entirely unhelpful. In at least one case, it was actively detrimental.
For one, I thought I would try his course for $299 which I wish I have not found any value in. Original price of $799. His whole studying concept is basically pre read lecture material using the textbook. This is not possible in every course because instructors do not make all the material available at the beginning of the semester. He advocates for not attending lecture at all once you have "mastered" reading the material ahead of time. The only courses I have taken that used an actual textbook has been chemistry. I paid for it because he offers a 14 day money back no questions asked refund. I have been unsuccessful reaching him. I paid through Paypal with a credit card, I may have to go through them. Basically as others on this thread have said and on previous threads about him, his courses are extremely overpriced for the value they offer. I have received so much more helpful advice from SDN. I am through 3 of the 5 pillars and up to this point nothing has been information that I should have paid for with all the advice here.Can you elaborate?
Act now and we will double your pillars at no additional cost.For one, I thought I would try his course for $299 which I wish I have not found any value in. Original price of $799. His whole studying concept is basically pre read lecture material using the textbook. This is not possible in every course because instructors do not make all the material available at the beginning of the semester. He advocates for not attending lecture at all once you have "mastered" reading the material ahead of time. The only courses I have taken that used an actual textbook has been chemistry. I paid for it because he offers a 14 day money back no questions asked refund. I have been unsuccessful reaching him. I paid through Paypal with a credit card, I may have to go through them. Basically as others on this thread have said and on previous threads about him, his courses are extremely overpriced for the value they offer. I have received so much more helpful advice from SDN. I am through 3 of the 5 pillars and up to this point nothing has been information that I should have paid for with all the advice here.
He told an applicant to show up without an appointment to plead their case. The incident was reported to a member of the committee who recognized the name of the applicant. He called the applicant to recommend that they should avoid behavior that could be viewed as desperate. His response was that his advisor had told him that it was a good technique.Can you elaborate?
Sounds like he followed through with the attack part, but neglected to dominate.The edited information (I try to protect the innocent) is that he told an applicant to show up without an appointment to plead their case. The incident was reported to a member of the committee who recognized the name of the applicant. He called the applicant to recommend that they might have greater success by avoiding behavior that could be viewed as desperate. His response was that his advisor had told him that it was a good technique.
It isn't.
AMC recommends that MCAT scores be averages because that's a better predictor of success (or lack of it, actually) than the highest score.On one of his livestreams he advised someone to take the mcat for the 4th time and didn't seem to act like that would matter. Is it up to the school how to handle multiple scores?
That's crazy. I can't fathom how anyone would think that would be a successful technique unless the goal is to be rejected. If the strategy was successful every whiny premed (including those bickering over petty points on an exam when he/she already has an A grade) would flood admissions offices.He told an applicant to show up without an appointment to plead their case. The incident was reported to a member of the committee who recognized the name of the applicant. He called the applicant to recommend that they should avoid behavior that could be viewed as desperate. His response was that his advisor had told him that it was a good technique.
It isn't.