OK, just wondering time is ticking to that 31st of May date. I have done the first part of EK physics and IMO I am not that upset with it. I HATE how EK loves to babel on about something and then test on another thing which they never taught you in the first place. Bio wasn't bad but then the CHEMISTRY towards the end got rediculous. I was wondering where they even got the questions from? I scored well 10's 11's or 12's on every sections but I saw some serious issues with their explanation methods. However, my background was strong enought to overcome a lot of it. With that said, what is everyone's opinion for those of you who stuck with the EK including the physics portion? Did you need a lot of extra material? was EK enough... Like I said I did the first lecture and I learned a lot I had forgot and felt pretty good about it. Even better than the physics I say. I bought the Nova book and have it but it seems like they go to far into it. To much you know what I mean. Like for 25 questions that huge freaking book is somewhat silly. I think it might be good for extra practice problems though and it is in passage format... Let me know and time is a ticking.