The wording of Duke's secondary seems to specifically ask for a life-changing experience when it asks for an ethical dilemma.
Would it be taboo to write about moral issues involved with handling money? I want to talk about a large inheritance I received - how I had to come to a decision to prioritize certain values over others; I ultimately end with discussing how this dilemma made me realize that influence cannot be measured by scalable achievements, that generosity has the same spirit in context of an individual as well as a larger-scale philanthropic endeavor, and as a doctor I would prioritize these things - living a life of generosity, using my skills without expectation of reciprocity, rather than quantifying success with scalable measurements, prioritizing the people-value of actions made by money and time.
I know I'll never be classified as URM anyway, so I thought there's no use in hiding it.
Would it be taboo to write about moral issues involved with handling money? I want to talk about a large inheritance I received - how I had to come to a decision to prioritize certain values over others; I ultimately end with discussing how this dilemma made me realize that influence cannot be measured by scalable achievements, that generosity has the same spirit in context of an individual as well as a larger-scale philanthropic endeavor, and as a doctor I would prioritize these things - living a life of generosity, using my skills without expectation of reciprocity, rather than quantifying success with scalable measurements, prioritizing the people-value of actions made by money and time.
I know I'll never be classified as URM anyway, so I thought there's no use in hiding it.