- Joined
- Jun 15, 2005
- Messages
- 298
- Reaction score
- 0
I am in the middle of trying to write a series of short, simple ethical dilemmas that could be presented to the general public. Of course, they should not have a "right" answer. They also need to be in third person rather than first or second. Here is an example:
Stephen is a prosecutor in Los Angeles. He feels that two men have taken part in a murder. However, the only way he can get a solid conviction for one is to grant the other immunity in exchange for his testimony. It will mean setting a murderer free in return for the chance of putting another away. What should he do?
They can involve ANY ethical topic (not just law). Can anyone help? I've written about ten and I'm drawing blanks now.
Stephen is a prosecutor in Los Angeles. He feels that two men have taken part in a murder. However, the only way he can get a solid conviction for one is to grant the other immunity in exchange for his testimony. It will mean setting a murderer free in return for the chance of putting another away. What should he do?
They can involve ANY ethical topic (not just law). Can anyone help? I've written about ten and I'm drawing blanks now.