Examcrackers Vs. Berkeley Review

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

shaq786

Senior Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2004
Messages
366
Reaction score
0
Ok you all, I know this question has been asked before about each one of these companies individually, but I'm wondering what you all think of each of these companies materials versus eachother. I'm leaning toward buying Berkeley review over examcrackers and I was wondering did anyone find berkeley's stuff(passages, review material) more helpful than Ek's?

Members don't see this ad.
 

PRamos

Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2004
Messages
208
Reaction score
1
I liked the EK books, especially physics and biology. I thought their physics was conceptual and well written. The orgo was okay but chemsitry was weak. Their verbal method is good for their passages, but I didn't think it helped as much on real MCAT passages. What I didn't like were the passages and short answer explanations.

I liked that BR answer explanations explained the concepts and how to work through to the correct answer. I found most of their passages to be on the mark, especially in chemistry, orgo, and physics. Their physics and chemistry text is very good. Their new orgo text is the best of the ones I used. I think their Bio text could use some work (too long winded in certain chapters). What makes their materials strong are all the passages and the test logic they incorporate into the explanations.

Both materials are useful, but if you are only going to buy one, I'd probably recommend BR. You get more passages with them and that's really what you need.
 

hnbui

Addicted to Yale Med
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2004
Messages
672
Reaction score
0
yeah i have this same question too. I've heard that the examkrackers verbal section is better than BR.
 
Top