Hi all,
So our school invests a few days pretty heavily on genetic counseling and related issues: for example we use Bayes' theorem to calculate that the probably a child will have a duchenne's MD assuming a 1/3 de novo mutation rate etc.
I was wondering if this is even remotely low yield or just completely untested? I'm not referring to basic carrier autodom/autorecessive etc nor am I talking about epidemiology (sensitivity,specificity), but more advanced mathematics (Bayes') to estimate the probably of a child having disease?
Please let me know- Thanks!
So our school invests a few days pretty heavily on genetic counseling and related issues: for example we use Bayes' theorem to calculate that the probably a child will have a duchenne's MD assuming a 1/3 de novo mutation rate etc.
I was wondering if this is even remotely low yield or just completely untested? I'm not referring to basic carrier autodom/autorecessive etc nor am I talking about epidemiology (sensitivity,specificity), but more advanced mathematics (Bayes') to estimate the probably of a child having disease?
Please let me know- Thanks!