• Livestream AMA: Join SDN as we welcome Dr. John Ligon, a Pediatric Oncologist with the National Cancer Institute on May 11th at 8:00 PM Eastern. Register now!

UCFpremed

Tooth Shucker
10+ Year Member
Apr 22, 2006
139
3
Status (Visible)
  1. Attending Physician
This is a new edition of the First Aid NBDE part I book. I've read on these forums that the 1st edition contained errors and that people recommended the First Aid for the USMLE as as more thorough book with less error. Has anyone used the 2nd edition of the NBDE part I book yet? Give us some feedback.
 

firasoblast

10+ Year Member
Feb 12, 2008
127
0
Dallas,TX
Status (Visible)
  1. Dentist
This is a new edition of the First Aid NBDE part I book. I've read on these forums that the 1st edition contained errors and that people recommended the First Aid for the USMLE as as more thorough book with less error. Has anyone used the 2nd edition of the NBDE part I book yet? Give us some feedback.


I have the 2nd edition. it's flawless. minor printing errors but overall it's a superb study guide. biochemistry and metabolism section lacking a bit of infos though so you will need to read it from other resources.

just my 2 cents
 

DAT-Scared

Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Feb 8, 2006
70
0
Status (Visible)
  1. Dental Student
I realized that there is only one chapter that is different. Overall, i think it's a lot better than the first one since it has more condensed info and it's a lot thinner than the first one!!!.
 
About the Ads

nbde

10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member
Aug 27, 2008
61
0
Status (Visible)
  1. Dental Student
I have the 2nd edition. it's flawless. minor printing errors but overall it's a superb study guide. biochemistry and metabolism section lacking a bit of infos though so you will need to read it from other resources.

just my 2 cents

HEY.
from where do u get second edition ? hv u bought it or downloaded from somewhere ?
 
5

54807

There are still errors and it only took me about 20 mins to find the first obvious one.

The paper changed so it's a lighter book. The images are also now smaller for dental anatomy when I compared it to my classmate's.

It does have slightly different wording here and there.

It's nice to have everything in one resource but still lacking in some areas and I commonly found myself referencing decks instead.

I'd still get it for the efficiency aspect of it.
 

firasoblast

10+ Year Member
Feb 12, 2008
127
0
Dallas,TX
Status (Visible)
  1. Dentist
There are still errors and it only took me about 20 mins to find the first obvious one.

The paper changed so it's a lighter book. The images are also now smaller for dental anatomy when I compared it to my classmate's.

It does have slightly different wording here and there.

It's nice to have everything in one resource but still lacking in some areas and I commonly found myself referencing decks instead.

I'd still get it for the efficiency aspect of it.


I agree with you, still lacking in some areas but I like the layout and how it's more organized than any other material.

you can't compare it to decks since decks has been around for over 15 years. decks consultants for part 1 are 7 competent people 4 of them are PhD holders! while the first aid is student to student guide!
 

chipotle

10+ Year Member
Jun 18, 2008
74
0
Status (Visible)
  1. Dental Student
I agree with you, still lacking in some areas but I like the layout and how it's more organized than any other material.

you can't compare it to decks since decks has been around for over 15 years. decks consultants for part 1 are 7 competent people 4 of them are PhD holders! while the first aid is student to student guide!

u have a lot of information firasoblast .....but yes ur right everything is given in a condensed form in the decks ..
 
About the Ads
This thread is more than 12 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.