- Joined
- Nov 5, 2013
- Messages
- 69
- Reaction score
- 11
Last edited:
[/quote]Good luck in your endeavor; it's definitely doable.
I have a high opinion of Americorps, so you've got one good EC under your belt so far.
I have always leaned towards medicine (was premed my first year of college), and have done public service in the past (two years serving in a high-need area through Americorps).
You have an uphill battle...highly competitive is the watchword.
Also I'd like to go to school in CA since my significant other already has a job here and we are pretty serious. I know all the CA schools are competitive, and given my financial situation I am not looking at any private medical schools.
As a non-trad you can dispense with the clinical research (or any research for that matter). What you need is shadowing experience (so you know what you're getting into and what a doctor's day is like) and patient contact experience (so you can show us that like being around sick and injured people). Best thing to do will be contact your local hospitals and finding out what kind of volunteering schedules they have that can mesh with your work schedule. Also, think outside the box and look at clinics, nursing homes, hospice, being a big Brother/Sister, or camps for sick/disabled children. Also check with your local houses of worship.
Biggest question now - What kind of clinical experiences can I get working full-time? How about clinical research opportunities?
Thanks, and I hope to continue this conversation and follow in the footsteps of many lawyer-->doctors here!
Thanks Law2Doc! I'm probably underestimating how difficult the MCAT will be....I'll take some full length diagnostics after studying and get back to you with what my scores are.
As for this being a humbling path, you hit the nail on the head. I really do expect hardship in the future, but I believe it will be worth it. I know that there are many smart premeds out there. I'm not sure if that is true, but I do know the path ahead is a difficult one.
I do have a desire to work with underserved communities. What made you say it came off "hollow"? I'm assuming if you feel that way, so would many
adcoms so I'd like to find out why.
"if on paper you seem to have gone for the big salary in law, they are going to assume you probably will in medicine too"
Specifically, how do I combat or at least deal with this assumption? I mean financially it doesn't make sense to go into seven years of debt and no income by walking away from a six figure salary now for the money. Yet, I've heard this criticism before and am lost as to what I can do about it....
As a former Big Law firm attorney yourself, how did you sell the transition to medicine? I became disenchanted with just doing a job for the salary, and my parents' financial situation has stabilized. I understand there are many ways to help people in law as well, but I do not find that route as fulfilling. I would like to practice medicine because I believe it is more in line with my strengths, and I would personally want to make a change through improving people's healths.
However, after speaking with several adcoms I realize "Why medicine? Why now?" is the question that is probably the most crucial one in terms of my med school application. And I can't roll off an answer that the typical 22 year old premed gives....
One of two things that alarm me about your plan is taking the MCAT without any physics, orgo II, and bio II. That's half of your prereqs.
Apollo1 I actually do remember all those concepts! When I first saw those terms I panicked but I thought about it for a minute and the concepts came back to me. I know a review would help me refresh those concepts.
The biggest blind spots are Orgo and physics. Chem and bio are very familiar subjects for me since high school and college FWIW.
What I don't understand is the advice that I should take more prereqs. I know for the CA bar exam there were 13 subjects covered and I hadn't taken six of them in law school but learned the relevant material via a prep course. Isn't that what they are for , to review content on the exam? I would imagine any class would cover lots of topics outside the scope of the MCAT and be over inclusive or under inclusive anyways.
I'd love to hear differently!
This gets back to what I was saying before about doing things properly. The classes are called "prereqs" and not "postreqs" for a reason. Is there someone on this site who scored 40+ on the MCAT without studying at all, taking any prereqs, and/or following other shortcuts? Probably. But it's an arrogant attitude to approach the test with, and the vast majority of people will be most successful if they take the classes first, then study for the exam, and *then* take the exam.Apollo1 I actually do remember all those concepts! When I first saw those terms I panicked but I thought about it for a minute and the concepts came back to me. I know a review would help me refresh those concepts.
The biggest blind spots are Orgo and physics. Chem and bio are very familiar subjects for me since high school and college FWIW.
What I don't understand is the advice that I should take more prereqs. I know for the CA bar exam there were 13 subjects covered and I hadn't taken six of them in law school but learned the relevant material via a prep course. Isn't that what they are for , to review content on the exam? I would imagine any class would cover lots of topics outside the scope of the MCAT and be over inclusive or under inclusive anyways.
I'd love to hear differently!
Second, it is not reasonable for you to work full time as a professional (which is probably more than full time in terms of hours per week) and expect to complete all of your prereqs, study for the MCAT, ace the MCAT, amass 20 gazillion hours of clinical experience, pay off your loans, marry your fiancee, save the children, and get into the med school of your choice in CA all in one year.
Hi,
I know all the CA schools are competitive, and given my financial situation I am not looking at any private medical schools.