I've been looking through some of these FL practice score vs. Real MCAT score charts/spreadsheets, and they seem pretty great-- even too good to be true. These tools basically say "add ten points to your average, and that's your score". I realize that the scores used to compile data have an average real MCAT score of about a 512, which obviously isn't representative of all of us mortals. I would assume that a lot of people have the same questions I do, which are as follows:
First question: when and how did the FL scoring change for testing companies? I've seen some mentions of the Kaplan scoring system change, but no one seems to know exactly how the scoring has changed. I would assume most testing companies have worked to make their scores more predictive as they've gained more data since the 2015 test was developed.
Second question: Which tests are the best (on average), as far as content goes (I'm asking for company and test #)? Most people say that EK and NS are the top choices for content... What I've experienced though, is that a couple tests from each company seem comparable to the AAMC material, but the rest of their tests are very different from AAMC and they taking them is equivalent to being nut (or ovary) punched for 7 hours.
Third question: Are there any of you out there who got average scores (497-503) on the real MCAT that have practice test averages?
I realize this post stems out of a desire to be able to predict my MCAT score, which is ridiculous and a futile waste of time, but I have issues. We all do.
Thanks for your help.
First question: when and how did the FL scoring change for testing companies? I've seen some mentions of the Kaplan scoring system change, but no one seems to know exactly how the scoring has changed. I would assume most testing companies have worked to make their scores more predictive as they've gained more data since the 2015 test was developed.
Second question: Which tests are the best (on average), as far as content goes (I'm asking for company and test #)? Most people say that EK and NS are the top choices for content... What I've experienced though, is that a couple tests from each company seem comparable to the AAMC material, but the rest of their tests are very different from AAMC and they taking them is equivalent to being nut (or ovary) punched for 7 hours.
Third question: Are there any of you out there who got average scores (497-503) on the real MCAT that have practice test averages?
I realize this post stems out of a desire to be able to predict my MCAT score, which is ridiculous and a futile waste of time, but I have issues. We all do.
Thanks for your help.