- Joined
- Jun 11, 2006
- Messages
- 84
- Reaction score
- 6
Last edited:
He/she was probably just hired by NYCOM to teach anatomy next fall, just need to learn it first.Why does an attending need anatomy notes?
He/she was probably just hired by NYCOM to teach anatomy next fall, just need to learn it first.
He/she was probably just hired by NYCOM to teach anatomy next fall, just need to learn it first.
Rohen's anatomy atlas is the one with pictures. Invaluable.
Which is better...Gray's Anatomy or the Clinically Oriented Anatomy text?
I already have Rohen's and Netter's anatomy atlases. I was planning on doing some reading up on anatomy before I start next Fall (I deferred my 2010 admission).
None. Don't read up before you start.
Mind me asking why?
You won't retain much of it and whatever you do retain will end up becoming an insignificant amount compared to the volume of material you will be bombarded with.
Plus, your next 2 years are pretty much filled with constant learning and memorization day in and out. Enjoy all of the free time you have now.
Mind me asking why?
Look, if you're just itching to read up on stuff...do biochemistry. At least with that subject you stand a chance of retaining something before class starts, and most people find biochem to be a real handful first year. Frankly, gross anatomy is taught in a fashion that is way too abstract to get much out of trying to study it at this point. You really need to have a cadaver in front of you to efficiently study anatomy IMHO.
And while we're at it, I think any version of Gray's Anatomy generally sucks as a text. Thieme tends to be a lot better than Netter's for limb anatomy and general musculoskeletal stuff, but Netter's has the edge for visceral anatomy. I personally never used Rohen's, but I wish I had in retrospect.