genes for short-sightedness

Taurus

Paul Revere of Medicine
15+ Year Member
Jul 27, 2004
3,155
488
  1. Attending Physician
    Found, genes that could save millions from short-sight and lead to a drug to combat condition

    Children would no longer be at risk of complications of short-sightedness which could cause blindness
    But more research is needed and any drug to prevent condition is at least 15 years away

    By Fiona Macrae

    PUBLISHED: 15:24 EST, 10 February 2013 | UPDATED: 18:55 EST, 10 February 2013

    A host of genes for short-sightedness has been discovered in a breakthrough that could benefit millions.

    A British-led team of scientists identified 24 genes containing information that could lead to a drug to stop many children becoming short-sighted.

    It could spare families from spending a fortune on contact lenses, as well as the expense of laser surgery.

    ...
     

    odieoh

    Member
    10+ Year Member
    15+ Year Member
    Jun 25, 2003
    384
    30
    www.cubs.com
    1. Attending Physician
      Interesting, but unlikely to lead to a practical solution anytime soon. As the article mentioned, anything that stops the eye from growing could affect other forms of growth too, which is problematic. Even if this hurdle is overcome, any such medication would likely be extremely expensive and would outweigh the cost of glasses.

      The article also seems to overstate this horrible condition of being "shortsighted." Pathological myopia is a problem but that is different than your average myopia.

      The article also implies that spending time "in front of a screen" worsens myopia, which, to the best of my knowledge, has not been proven.
       
      About the Ads

      hurdlepup

      Surviving Intern Year
      10+ Year Member
      Feb 11, 2010
      244
      29
      On Country Roads
      1. Resident [Any Field]
        I think Taurus's problem is due to the subpar training FNPs receive. Look at this sample curriculum and tell me that a graduate of this program is really ready to see patient independently and that you have no problem sending your mom to an essentially unsupervised FNP with this level of training.

        Probably don't want to get started on this but I had a meeting last night where I watched an FNP who will graduate at the same time I will graduate med school (this May) leading an interdisciplinary team in an exercise and there's no way she's more qualified than me to lead a patient care team. She incorrectly managed the patient in almost every aspect and it was all I could do to bite my tongue since I was just supposed to be an observer.
         

        Attachments

        • msn-fnp.pdf
          12.8 KB · Views: 5

        ophthope

        Oh Dear, No Venison
        5+ Year Member
        Dec 29, 2011
        410
        91
        1. Attending Physician
          I think Taurus's problem is due to the subpar training FNPs receive. Look at this sample curriculum and tell me that a graduate of this program is really ready to see patient independently and that you have no problem sending your mom to an essentially unsupervised FNP with this level of training.

          Probably don't want to get started on this but I had a meeting last night where I watched an FNP who will graduate at the same time I will graduate med school (this May) leading an interdisciplinary team in an exercise and there's no way she's more qualified than me to lead a patient care team. She incorrectly managed the patient in almost every aspect and it was all I could do to bite my tongue since I was just supposed to be an observer.

          Woah, an FNP degree is just 42 hours? Is this for someone who is already an RN? I had no idea the training was so little.
           
          About the Ads
          This thread is more than 8 years old.

          Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

          1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
          2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
          3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
          4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
          5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
          6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
          7. This thread is locked.