Genicular nerve- conventional RF

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

NJPAIN

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
2,666
Reaction score
1,687
I have a Medicare patient that did very well with a genicular LA block. wanted to do a water-cooled RF of same but hospital says no. Are any of you using conventional thermal RF for these. If so:

What size probe?
How many lesions?

Members don't see this ad.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
strange, it comes up in my browser and my iphone

here's the link if it's not working
 
I have a Medicare patient that did very well with a genicular LA block. wanted to do a water-cooled RF of same but hospital says no. Are any of you using conventional thermal RF for these. If so:

What size probe?
How many lesions?

Cooled RF is unnecessary, but I'm thinking i may start using 16G cannulae when doing conventional RF for knees.
 
It is a very small world we pain docs live in!

Great lecture Steve!

So happens I did a genicular RF case today with the 16 ga cannulae bedrock was discussing.

Strange because this procedure pays very little in the ASC setting and I got a case approved today basically on charity grounds. Normally I'm not allowed to do genicular RF at the ASC. I'd done this lady 2 years ago under ultrasound, but her knees are now too fat for me to use U/s so I needed flouro.

Doing it under U/s by the way is not fun.

IMAGE006.jpg
IMAGE008.jpg
IMAGE007.jpg
 
Last edited:
I've been doing conventional with an 18g, 2 burns per nerve, moving second closer to condyle. My n is only 3, but seems more painful near/on periosteum than spine. Not sure if want to go 16g. I've been using a ton of local down to bone too. I've also been coming in w more ipsi lateral oblique to make sliding to mid shaft easier.

1 pt 20% relief, 1 90%, 1 complete medial, no better lateral knee pain.

For those who have done more: any differences in outcome noted for post tka vs just severe oa?
 
Top