whoa! Now I agree that there are not alot of reviews about the Gold Standard on SDN. But I looked around before using their stuff and got alot of good review particularly about their exams. So, here are a few places where you can read what other students think:
1) on SDN, one student felt that the content resembled the real August 2006 exam (more so than Kaplan) but the buttons on the MCAT CBT seemed confusing:
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=348937
2) Ian Wong (medical student) in his geocities website: " In my opinion, The Gold Standard is a must-have . . . the sample questions tended to be of a slightly higher caliber than the actual MCAT, which means you study to a higher level than is really necessary. I believe this to be ideal, as you are less likely to encounter a "just where the heck did that come from?" curveball-type question." -
http://www.geocities.com/hotsprings/oasis/8998/frames.html, click on "MCAT"; older site but MCAT content has not changed.
3) reviews on Amazon.com are funny. There is one bad review (1/5 stars) from a student who hated the book but says that the only good thing is that the practice tests are just like the AAMC's:
http://www.amazon.com/Gold-Standard..._bbs_sr_2/102-7242115-1861704?ie=UTF8&s=books
4) review on eBay about a guy who only sells Gold Standard MCAT stuff: over 750 student reviews (now that's alot and the reviews are up to yesterday), 99.9% positive (some reviews just talk about shipping and others talk about the materials):
http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback&userid=md-4-me
Soooooo, make your own judgement and then contribute to the board !