Thank you for this. It is appreciated.
We don't profess to put out superstars. I was initially responding to your "thumbs down" comment about us. I speak proudly of the program, because there are many of us, who put a significant effort in training the next generation of podiatrists, with little to no vested interest in doing so. Other than paying it forward. Truly, and I can only speak for myself, but I'm not involved in the program to drive the perception of our program to anyone but students who are looking for an excellent residency experience. I can honestly say that, for better or worse, my feeling is that all of our attendings are in it for the greater good of the profession. Not for accolades or for some fictitious pedestal podiatrists tend to put themselves on because they train residents.
What is a "superstar" in Podiatry? Why is that even important? Other than these forums, and in some academic and lecturing circuits, do you think most practicing podiatrist know who Justin Fleming is? Do you most residents even want to be "superstars"?
Again, my view on the process is that it is a preparation for life as a practicing podiatrist. And for all the rearfoot mumbo jumbo students all seem to salivate over, ultimately, for most practicing podiatrist, it represents a very small proportion of what is done in practice on a daily basis. And also happens to not be very financially viable compared to other things done in the office. One office visit with a pair of custom orthotics pays more than most insurances will pay for a triple arthrodesis. I'm also talking in generalities. There will always be exceptions to every rule, but that what they are. Exceptions.
Again, appreciate your post very much. Be well and stay safe.
I just read and re-read your post. Sorry for my brutal honesty, be you seem to settle for mediocrity.
You ask why a “superstar” is even important. Did you REALLY ask that question?
Without “superstars” our profession will remain stagnant. Without “superstars” our profession will always be followers and not leaders. Without “superstars” current procedures and technology will never be questioned whether it can be improved. Without “superstars” it will always be business as usual. Without “superstars” our profession will never gain respect. Without “superstars” there will he no research or originality. With “superstars” our residents will be cookie cutter and will continue to be taught by drones who have no right teaching surgery. Should I go on?
Those who don’t perform major rearfoot, reconstructive and ankle surgery (I don’t believe those procedures are in your armamentarium) are always preaching how you really can’t make any money doing those cases.
Sure, you can make lots of money hawking $700 orthoses when the majority of those patients would have equal success with a pair or $50 PowerSteps.
Sure, you can convince a patient to have laser surgery for nails for lots of money, knowing that it won’t have any beneficial effect.
Sure, you can sell antifungal nail polish at your front counter, knowing you’ve REALLY helped patients with that crap.
Sure, you can sell vitamins to “cure” their neuropathy, knowing they can buy the same ingredients at Target.
You carefully avoided ALL my prior questions when I asked if your “Jefferson” (NJ) residents have any rotations at Jefferson University Hospital in Philly. You avoided my question whether you are REALLY banging your chest that this is “Jefferson” when in reality it’s a former nationally unknown NJ hospital system that was recently purchased by Jefferson. Time for a reality check.
Sorry, but I keep going back to your statement about doing a triple vs making orthoses. When is the last time you did a triple to know from experience? So when that patient comes in and NEEDS a triple and your holy grail magical plastic inserts (orthoses) don’t work, what do you do?
Do you tell the patient that a triple doesn’t pay as much so you’re not doing it? Do you tell them there are no “superstars” in your practice that can do it? Or do you now refer them to a “superstar” DPM or orthopedic surgeon?
What message are you sending to your residents? “I don’t think you should learn or perform these surgeries because they don’t pay enough?” Is it all about how much more you can make in your office or is about offering and providing the best care, regardless of reimbursement?
And for what it’s worth, I know lots of well trained DPMs who perform a LOT of major cases and are doing VERY well financially.
Let’s get back to your mediocrity. You ask “do the residents even want to be superstars?” No, I pick residents who all want to be mediocre. Are you kidding me? Again, did you REALLY write that comment? I don’t know if a particular resident wants to be a superstar but the residency committee and I ALWAYS attempted to choose those who we felt had the knowledge, skill and drive to WANT to be a superstar and we thought COULD be a superstar.
Sorry to hear that you don’t have the same feeling. Mediocre is certainly very easy and very safe.
You also state you have no or minimal vested interest. I would hope you’d have lots of vested interest. You should be heavily vested with your time, skills, guidance and knowledge. I will presume you meant no FINANCIAL interest. But if these residents rotate through your office and see patients, it’s free labor and you do have a financial interest. If they spend time working up patients in your office and seeing your post op patients, it’s free labor and you do have a financial interest. If you receive a stipend for being the residency director, you do have a financial interest (when I was a residency director I donated every penny back to the program to help pay for quality CME courses, books, journals, etc).
You seem like a nice guy and run of the mill DPM who stays safe within his own little comfort zone. But you shouldn’t be hindering the training of residents based on your happiness with mediocrity.
Again, don’t tell me about your great journal club or cadaver labs. That really is meaningless if the overall training is as you describe and I know.
My advice? Swallow your pride and search for a “superstar” to run your program, up the quality of the program and potentially put out some new “superstars”.