Gunderson vs. Perez

Discussion in 'Radiation Oncology' started by NewRes, Jun 17, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. NewRes

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    It's been a while since people posted thoughts on the "New Perez" thread and I am planning to buy one of these monster books. So I would appreciate any suggestions on which one book to buy.
    Thanks.
     
  2. Thread continues after this sponsor message. SDN Members do not see this ad.

  3. radonc

    radonc Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    1
  4. Gfunk6

    Gfunk6 And to think . . . I hesitated
    Physician PhD Faculty Moderator Emeritus Lifetime Donor Classifieds Approved

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2004
    Messages:
    3,464
    Likes Received:
    381
    Status:
    Attending Physician
    My opinion is to buy the book with different institutional affiliations than yours. For instance, many faculty at my institution wrote chapters in Perez so I bought Gunderson. It's nice to have fresh perspectives on various subsites rather than simply reinforce your faculty's point of view.
     
  5. temujim

    temujim Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2002
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    0
    nice thing about the new perez is the entire book is on the internet (you get a passcode when you buy the book). That way, you don't have to carry that millstone around. Plus with it online, you can rip tables and figures for your talks.

    head to head though, I like the gunderson; it's more solidly constructed, has better paper (though perez upgraded substantially from their last monstrosity) and on the whole is a better "read".
     
  6. miamiradonc

    miamiradonc Junior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2006
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think that some of the chapters are better for some disease sites than others in each book. It might be helpful to compile a list of the didactically superior chapters from each text. They are excellent complements.
     
  7. stephew

    stephew SDN Super Moderator
    Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2001
    Messages:
    2,362
    Likes Received:
    7
    I think gfunk's advice and miamiradonc's analysis are correct.
    please continue on old thread. Thank you.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page