Health Care Bill - Reform and The Future


Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Oct 15, 2002
July 20, 2009

Please take a moment and read this article

The final version of the Bill is far from final!!

Keep up the letter writing and calls

If you are a member of a practice group please make sure every member of your group writes or calls

I will let you know when I receive an update from ASA

Many thanks

Michael C. Lewis MD

President: Florida Society of Anesthesiologists

Roll Call

Leaders Facing a Big Sales Job on Health Bill
By Tory Newmyer Roll Call Staff
July 20, 2009, 12 a.m. elated Content

Determining the trajectory of health care in the House depends on your vantage point. The view from the top is apparently rosy, as House Democratic leaders gathered Friday at a rah-rah news conference to boast that the measure was picking up steam after clearing two of three committees.

“We are in very excellent shape,” Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said.

From ground level, however, things looked considerably darker.

Even as the bill marches forward, Democratic leaders are facing revolts on multiple fronts. The most serious threat remains from moderates in the Blue Dog Coalition, who, varyingly, want deeper cost cuts, a more limited public option and a fix for regional disparities under Medicare.

The package passed the Ways and Means and Education and Labor committees early Friday after long markups that stretched through the night and into the morning. The bill grew even more liberal in the Education and Labor markup when Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) succeeded in attaching an amendment allowing states to opt in to a federally funded single-payer health care system.

But Blue Dogs are planning to make their stand this week in the Energy and Commerce Committee.

The group has seven members on the panel, enough to bring down the bill if their concerns aren’t addressed. And at least one other disaffected Democrat on the panel pledged Friday to block the bill on the floor if leaders decide to bypass the committee altogether. “They can’t continue to ignore us,” Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) said.

Stupak joined six Blue Dogs who broke ranks in the Friday markup to put a Republican amendment over the top despite the objections of Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.). The early defeat for Waxman signaled trouble ahead.

Behind objections to how the package would expand coverage is a more fundamental concern over whether it will bring down costs. Douglas Elmendorf, the director of the Congressional Budget Office, sent shock waves through House Democratic ranks when he testified before the Senate on Thursday that the House bill would actually increase federal health care costs rather than cut them.

Blue Dogs, business-friendly moderates in the New Democrat Coalition and others have said reining in health care spending should be the first priority in the reform drive. “We’ve got to fix the system before we throw more money at it,” Rep. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) said.

And if the draft bill does nothing to achieve that, some said, lawmakers need to go back to the drawing board.

“Nobody is giving it very good marks right now,” said Rep. Allen Boyd (D-Fla.), a senior Blue Dog. “Many of us think we should scrap it and start over.”

Leaders are facing trouble on other fronts, as well. Led by Rep. Jared Polis (Colo.), 22 Democrats, mostly freshmen, on Friday sent Pelosi a letter expressing strong objections to the surcharge tax on the wealthy that would raise $544 billion to pay for expanded coverage. The freshmen, who huddled with Pelosi twice last week, argued that the tax increase would hurt small businesses. They made the case for a smaller tax — and the need to cut spending — directly to President Barack Obama and Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel in a meeting at the White House on Friday. The session was cut short by House votes, but Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), the freshman class president, said he expected the conversation to pick up again this week.

On top of their substantive concerns, the new lawmakers are worried they will have to take a tough vote on the tax on the rich only to see it significantly rejiggered in negotiations with the Senate.

“We’re skeptical this will be the ultimate financing mechanism,” Polis said. “It’s probably a vote to no avail.”

It’s a common concern for Democrats from swing districts, who are aiming to avoid a vote on a liberal House bill that would get moderated — after a long, bruising August break — in talks with the Senate.

The freshmen made that point to Pelosi in their meeting with her last week, suggesting she allow the House more time to complete its version so it will track more closely with what the Senate produces. And on Friday, she left wiggle room for delaying a vote before lawmakers leave town for the summer recess. After reasserting that her plan is to “move forward to have a bill on the floor,” she added, “We have to see what the Senate is going to do.”


Senior Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Oct 15, 2002
July 21, 2009

New U.S. House health reform bill extends unacceptably low Medicare payment rates
Call your Member of Congress Today – Committee action already underway

Please call your Member of Congress today. You can use the ASA CapWiz Action Center for contact information and talking points. This is found at:

After weeks of hearings and closed door negotiations, Democratic leaders in the U.S. House of Representatives formally unveiled their health care reform proposal, H.R. 3200, the "America's Affordable Health Choices Act."

This historic bill includes a number of important delivery reforms that will expand access to insurance for the uninsured. ASA commends the authors of this legislation for their work.

However, much to the disappointment of the ASA, the bill contains provisions expanding Medicare's flawed payment level for anesthesia services. H.R. 3200 creates a new government-sponsored insurance option tied to Medicare called the "public health insurance option." Payments to providers under this plan would be based on Medicare rates. Payments for anesthesia services would be based upon Medicare's unacceptably low anesthesia conversion factor - a payment level calculated to be only 33% percent of commercial/private insurance levels.

The extension of the flawed Medicare payment level through this plan could have serious consequences for both private practice and academic anesthesiologists. Accordingly, it must be stopped.

As part of the legislative process, H.R.3200 is now facing consideration by the House Energy and Commerce Committee. The bill will be subject to changes in Committee through an amendment process.

Reports suggest that key Committee leaders will be open to revisions to the legislation provided that there is sufficient support for the change on the committee.

ASA has already begun to urge lawmakers on the Committee to address anesthesiology's "33% problem:" the fact that Medicare pays 33 percent of what private insurers pay for anesthesia services. This payment level simply does not reflect the costs of providing anesthesiology medical care. As such, Congress should not use this payment level as a model for the new "public health insurance plan."

We need your assistance to also communicate our specialty's message to lawmakers. Through the din of outside groups carrying their message, it is critical that our voices be heard.

Please call your Representative today to tell him or her that:

· It would be unsustainable for the medical specialty of anesthesiology to operate within a public plan option based on Medicare payment rates.

· Payment levels for anesthesia services provided through the new "public health insurance option" must be fixed.

As we have stated in the past, these massive reform proposals inevitably include many issues - both good and bad - that will impact our specialty. We believe that this public option based upon Medicare rates represents the most important of these issues with regard to the well-being of our specialty. As such, it requires our immediate attention. We ask that you please do your part.

The health care reform effort has risen to a new level with the introduction of House legislation. With one Senate bill already under consideration and another one expected to be released soon, it is imperative that we echo our consistent message - that it would be unsustainable for the medical specialty of anesthesiology to operate within a public plan option based on Medicare payment rates.

Michael C. Lewis MD

President: Florida Society of Anesthesiologists
About the Ads
This thread is more than 12 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.