Hospital Shady Lab U-Tox Scam...

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

drusso

Full Member
Moderator Emeritus
Lifetime Donor
Joined
Nov 21, 1998
Messages
12,543
Reaction score
6,929
Basically, hospitals exploiting SOS d(f) and skimming extra reimbursement from government to do out-of-state lab tests.

Hospital lab charge spikes found at rural hospitals
By Tara Bannow | June 23, 2018
The roughly 3,000 residents of Stamford, Texas, appeared to be on the verge of losing their hospital in 2015, another casualty of the financial crisis facing rural hospitals.

But then Stamford Memorial Hospital seemed to have turned a corner based on an announcement from the hospital's CEO, Rick DeFoore, who told local media that the facility would stay open, thanks in part to "consulting help."

By the next year, lab charges would soar. Between 2015 and 2016, the hospital's outpatient lab test charges grew by an eye-popping 10,926% to nearly $70 million in 2016, from about $632,000 in 2015, the latest year for which Medicare cost report data are available. In 2016, the hospital's outpatient lab charges accounted for 93% of its total charges, compared with 11% in 2015.

Cary Davis, secretary of Stamford Hospital District's board of directors, said the hospital had a contract with an outside consultant in which it billed for "very expensive" cardiac tests that were sometimes performed elsewhere.

"These labs came to us and said, 'Would you do them? You could make some money on it,' " Davis said. "If somebody's going to do it, it might as well be us." DeFoore declined to comment on the lab contract.

The situation fits a trend that's cropped up in recent years: exploding lab charges by some rural hospitals. Insurers have accused them of breaching contracts by billing for tests performed elsewhere and on out-of-state patients. The issue is now the subject of lawsuits and a congressional inquiry. The Stamford hospital has not been the target of such accusations, at least not publicly.

An analysis of Medicare cost report data identified 21 hospitals whose outpatient lab charges exceeded 30% of the hospital's total charges in their most recent reports, either 2016 or 2017. In some cases, lab charges—billed mostly to private insurers but also to government payers—accounted for more than 80% of hospitals' total charges in a single year, according to an analysis by Modern Healthcare Metrics and the analytics firm Franklin Trust Ratings. Insurers typically pay only a portion of charges.

For comparison, the average outpatient lab-to-total charges ratio among all of the nearly 5,000 hospitals that filed cost reports was less than 9% in 2016 and about 12% so far for 2017.

Rural hospitals are being invited into such arrangements by what are usually out-of-state management companies seeking a way to tap into the typically higher rural hospital lab reimbursement rates. The hospitals agree to bill insurers for lab tests that in some cases were performed at outside labs and on patients with no connection to the hospitals. Such deals can be lucrative for the companies because insurers frequently pay rural hospitals much more for the tests than they do large labs like Quest Diagnostics or LabCorp.

INTERACTIVE: Outpatient lab charges to total hospital charges, 2011-2017

People familiar with the deals say the hospitals keep between 30% and 40% of the revenue from the lab tests, which include blood and urine screenings.

Davis said Stamford Memorial is no longer participating in the lab test billing arrangement, because it ultimately wasn't making the hospital money. DeFoore announced June 19 the hospital was laying off lab techs, phlebotomists and other laboratory staff because insurers were refusing to pay for lab services. In an email, he said the lab services were provided to physician offices across the state.

John Morrow, managing director of the business intelligence firm Franklin Trust Ratings, said the issue is more widespread than he realized. "It's alarming that there's not more outrage about it," he said.


Growing lab test charges
Rural hospitals across Texas, have been inundated by sales pitches for such lab arrangements, said Kevin Reed, general counsel for the Texas Organization of Rural & Community Hospitals. The arrangements typically bill commercial insurers, so as not to draw attention from the CMS. They also favor the use of management services agreements involving physicians, which Reed said seem to exist solely to pay the doctors. The agreements allow the management company to collect up to 80% of the lab test revenue, he said.

"In those cases, the physicians are obviously being paid to refer to the lab," Reed said. "To say they're highly suspect is to be kind. I think they're nothing but kickback arrangements."

Medicare rules allow rural hospitals to bill for lab tests performed on patients from other facilities and by outside labs, but there's disagreement over whether such arrangements comply with contracts between the hospitals and commercial insurers. "We know that these operators that do this are very coy," Morrow said. "They work right up to the edge of the law."

The 30% lab charges-to-total charges ratio used by Modern Healthcare, while well above average, does not necessarily mean something untoward is going on. Rural hospitals often serve as laboratory test providers for local doctors, nursing homes and other providers.

A spokeswoman for the critical-access hospital Mercy Hospital Columbus, for example, wrote in an email that the hospital serves a number of outpatient clinics and local nursing homes. Outpatient labs accounted for 41% of the hospital's total charges last year, and nearly half in 2016. Similarly, Dallas County Medical Center in Fordyce, Ark., whose 2016 ratio was 32%, performs lab testing for a 100-bed nursing facility, an assisted-living facility and a home health practice it owns. Some of its patients see out-of-town physicians who have the tests performed locally, a spokeswoman wrote in an email.

Lab charges at those hospitals, while higher than their peers, were relatively stable over the past five years.

Other hospitals show spikes in recent years, and a company called Little River Healthcare is deeply involved. At Stephens Memorial Hospital in Breckenridge, Texas, lab charges jumped from 33% of total charges in 2016 to 63% in 2017. CEO Matthew Kempton said that's because the hospital dramatically expanded its outpatient lab testing capacity, adding new equipment and hiring two new med techs in an effort to expand on a strong and growing revenue source. The hospital takes samples from local providers and communities as far as Abilene and the Dallas-Fort Worth area, but none from outside of Texas, he said. The hospital performed more than 200,000 tests last year, most of them blood tests. It does not perform toxicology tests.

"Many of these physicians want to support hospitals that are within their local communities and neighboring communities," Kempton said. "They would prefer to do that rather than send it to a large reference lab like LabCorp and Quest."

Stephens Memorial billed insurers $24 million for outpatient labs last year, but Kempton said the hospital only collected about 30% of that.

Some spikes are more dramatic. Outpatient lab charges at Mountain Lakes Medical Center in Clayton, Ga., for example, jumped about 1,100% between 2015 and 2016. The critical-access hospital, whose former CEO resigned last year, did not respond to a request for comment.

Commercial insurers are by now well aware of the lab test billing arrangements, and are fighting to recoup money they believe they paid inappropriately. They're also renegotiating contracts to preclude billing to lab tests for non-local patients, or, they're pulling their contracts with the hospitals in question altogether. In some cases, they're even taking the management companies to court.

Four hospitals sued Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Oklahoma last year after the insurer removed them from its network, alleging breach of contract. In October, a judge granted a temporary restraining order that permitted the hospitals to remain in-network. One of those hospitals, Drumright (Okla.) Regional Hospital, reported outpatient lab charges that were 44% of its total charges last year, according to Medicare cost report data.


Employers, employees pay
The lab test billing arrangements initially gained attention after Missouri's state auditor issued a scathing report that identified $90 million in inappropriate lab test payments to a rural hospital in Unionville. Nicole Galloway wrote that a management company used the hospital as a pass-through for out-of-state laboratory services. U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill called for a federal investigation.

That hospital, Putnam County Memorial Hospital, paid a company called Empower HIS, led by Jorge Perez, nearly $12 million to oversee lab billing between November 2016 and March 2017, according to an investigation by Side Effects Public Media.

Empower HMS, North Kansas City, Mo., an affiliated company whose website names Perez as its CEO, lists a number of hospitals that showed unusually high lab charges in recent years according to Modern Healthcare's analysis, including Regional General Hospital in Williston, Fla., Washington County Hospital in Plymouth, N.C., I-70 Community Hospital in Sweet Springs, Mo., and Drumright Regional. Empower HMS did not respond to a request for comment.

Three of those hospitals, Washington County, I-70 Community and Drumright, are referenced in a lawsuit brought by the lab company LGMG that names Perez as a defendant. LGMG wrote in its complaint that Perez and his associates violated their contract to provide lab services at the hospitals by canceling it last year without giving the required notice or letting the company remove its equipment. The original contract, signed in December 2015, requires the hospital to pay LGMG 60% of all lab services performed under the contract.

Often the hospitals are in such precarious financial conditions that they're at risk of closure, and view the arrangements as last-ditch efforts to keep the facilities open. Those pitching the deals promise to hire more staff and add new equipment. The arrangements can be mutually beneficial for a time. For hospitals, though, the reckoning comes when insurers try to recoup their money. In the most severe cases, hospitals have had to close.

The situation underscores the rural healthcare crisis. If there's no systemic response, the number of loopholes exploited by enterprising entrepreneurs or desperate hospitals will only grow, said Jamie Orlikoff, president of Orlikoff & Associates, a Chicago-based healthcare consulting firm. "The real crime here is that it's driving up total healthcare costs," he said, "and it's basically a shell game."

Scott Phillips, managing director of the healthcare consultancy Healthcare Management Partners, a turnaround specialist that is a partner in Modern Healthcare Metrics, said he's amazed insurers haven't responded faster. He thinks that's because when it comes to group plans, most of their commercial customers, employers bear the underwriting risk. When costs go up, they pass them onto employees through higher premiums.

"It's in the interest of the consumer and, frankly, of healthcare providers everywhere, to get this sorted," he said.

Members don't see this ad.
 
Yes what they are doing is wrong.

Better to let those rural hospitals all go under.

Tho it might mean patients have to drive a little farther to treat their STEMI. What’s 100 miles away if you are having a heart attack?
 
Top