How come rheumatology and endocrinology are not more popular?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
I am still a resident. Our program have us do 1 month hospital medicine as a PGY2 or PGY3 at an affiliated community hospital. In all honesty, it was not that bad. I was leaving @ 5 pm everyday and keep my pager on until 7pm (like the real hospitalists who work at that hospital). The few I was able to talk to like their job...

Again, I only did it for a month and the hospitalist there had good support as far as not dealing with social issues, and consultants were happy to see your patients. Maybe I should do it longer to have an accurate picture of what being a hospitalist entails. Well, I guess I will find out since I already decided to become one.

By the way, my cap was 10 and I was admitting an average of 2 patients/day. On the other hand, the hospitalist cap were 18 and they were also admitting an average of 2 patients/day.

I mean the hospitalists at my hospital have it pretty cush. 0 procedures, 0 codes, almost never need to go to rapids because the IM residents handle them. So I feel like I could see this being relatively sustainable.

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I would not either. The beauty of having that block schedule 7 day on/off is the fact of having a mini vacation every 2 wks.. Hospital medicine has become so popular now, there is even talk about having 1-yr fellowship.

NO. Not doing that. This is not pediatrics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I am still a resident. Our program have us do 1 month hospital medicine as a PGY2 or PGY3 at an affiliated community hospital. In all honesty, it was not that bad. I was leaving @ 5 pm everyday and keep my pager on until 7pm (like the real hospitalists who work at that hospital). The few I was able to talk to like their job...

Again, I only did it for a month and the hospitalist there had good support as far as not dealing with social issues, and consultants were happy to see your patients. Maybe I should do it longer to have an accurate picture of what being a hospitalist entails. Well, I guess I will find out since I already decided to become one.

By the way, my cap was 10 and I was admitting an average of 2 patients/day. On the other hand, the hospitalist cap were 18 and they were also admitting an average of 2 patients/day.
Come back after you have done hospitalist work for a few months...your experience of a month as a resident on a hospitalists service is similar to a med student rotating on a medicine service...what you see and what reality is are vastly different and you really dont get a true sense of the job.

And as you get older in the field, it does get harder to do longer runs...when I first started doing 7-10 days was no big deal...and I was at Temple as a hospitalist... now, 9 years later...I get antsy to be done in 5 days...now mind you I’m an admitter and a nocturnist when I do hospitalist work...

But having to admit and do floor work? Ugh...and most places hospitalist don’t have caps...I’ve been at places where the census was easily 25 pts ...on a regular basis.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
Endocrinology makes roughly equal to primary care money - so people only do it because they think it's interesting, or feel it would be an easier lifestyle.

I personally *hate* MSK complaints - probably the #1 chief complaint in most primary care offices - and two extra years of training was worth it to me to end up seeing patients I like and be able to turf any discussions of someone's back/knees/whatever. Financially, I'd be much better off if I had used that time and just worked locums hospitalist in Wyoming, but I have enough saved I can afford kibble for my dog, so I'm good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Just out of curiosity, and I'm a 3rd year right now, but are there many opportunities to fast-track into subspecialties? It seems silly to train for 3 + 3 to, like everyone is saying, get the same pay as a PCP for Rheum and Endo. Could it be knocked down to 2+3? Does the third year of IM really make that much of a difference? I am asking out of pure not-understanding, not trying to diss the third year of IM training.

Also, second question, why do so many people hate Primary Care? Is it because they don't like the patients? Aren't there many opportunities for you to tailor your practice to how you like? Such as studying more for Endocrine and Rheum b/c you really like those subjects, while knowing just baseline Primary Care for Cards and GI and are quicker to refer for such complaints? Or have a more intimate connection to an Ortho/PMR for MSK problems because you hate seeing them? (For examples)

I'm personally fascinated by every field and don't mind difficult patients, so I'm leaning toward Primary Care, because I like Endo just enough to know I wanna practice some Endo, but not enough to say I want to ONLY do Endo, and I can say the same for every sub-specialty there-on-out, as well as other specialties outside of IM such as Psych and Neuro. I'm not the biggest fan of procedures, but enjoy the interconnectedness of the entire human body and how that interfaces with psychosocial aspects of a patient's life. Is Primary Care the right choice for me? Is it really a bad gig or is everyone just ashamed of the prestige and/or lack of procedures?
 
Just out of curiosity, and I'm a 3rd year right now, but are there many opportunities to fast-track into subspecialties? It seems silly to train for 3 + 3 to, like everyone is saying, get the same pay as a PCP for Rheum and Endo. Could it be knocked down to 2+3? Does the third year of IM really make that much of a difference? I am asking out of pure not-understanding, not trying to diss the third year of IM training.

Also, second question, why do so many people hate Primary Care? Is it because they don't like the patients? Aren't there many opportunities for you to tailor your practice to how you like? Such as studying more for Endocrine and Rheum b/c you really like those subjects, while knowing just baseline Primary Care for Cards and GI and are quicker to refer for such complaints? Or have a more intimate connection to an Ortho/PMR for MSK problems because you hate seeing them? (For examples)

I'm personally fascinated by every field and don't mind difficult patients, so I'm leaning toward Primary Care, because I like Endo just enough to know I wanna practice some Endo, but not enough to say I want to ONLY do Endo, and I can say the same for every sub-specialty there-on-out, as well as other specialties outside of IM such as Psych and Neuro. I'm not the biggest fan of procedures, but enjoy the interconnectedness of the entire human body and how that interfaces with psychosocial aspects of a patient's life. Is Primary Care the right choice for me? Is it really a bad gig or is everyone just ashamed of the prestige and/or lack of procedures?
Endo and rheum are 2 year fellowships with a small minority of research track 3 year ones. So it's already 3+2 the majority of the time.

The only "fast track" option is actually slower - there's options for a 7 year track where you do two years IM and a 5 year research fellowship where the last year you're required to be junior faculty. It's only "faster" in that you spend less time in clinical training so you can focus more time on research.
 
Just out of curiosity, and I'm a 3rd year right now, but are there many opportunities to fast-track into subspecialties? It seems silly to train for 3 + 3 to, like everyone is saying, get the same pay as a PCP for Rheum and Endo. Could it be knocked down to 2+3? Does the third year of IM really make that much of a difference? I am asking out of pure not-understanding, not trying to diss the third year of IM training.

Also, second question, why do so many people hate Primary Care? Is it because they don't like the patients? Aren't there many opportunities for you to tailor your practice to how you like? Such as studying more for Endocrine and Rheum b/c you really like those subjects, while knowing just baseline Primary Care for Cards and GI and are quicker to refer for such complaints? Or have a more intimate connection to an Ortho/PMR for MSK problems because you hate seeing them? (For examples)

I'm personally fascinated by every field and don't mind difficult patients, so I'm leaning toward Primary Care, because I like Endo just enough to know I wanna practice some Endo, but not enough to say I want to ONLY do Endo, and I can say the same for every sub-specialty there-on-out, as well as other specialties outside of IM such as Psych and Neuro. I'm not the biggest fan of procedures, but enjoy the interconnectedness of the entire human body and how that interfaces with psychosocial aspects of a patient's life. Is Primary Care the right choice for me? Is it really a bad gig or is everyone just ashamed of the prestige and/or lack of procedures?

Let me ask...why do you think that if you “study” a little more, you can do endo or rheum, but have to refer out to gi and cards? Do you really think it’s that easy to pick up?

I’m sure all those mid levels all wanna practice a little internal medicine...and those of us that actually practice IM know what it really entails...

You wanna take care of diabetes and some thyroid ...trust me you will get to do that because there are just not enough of us out there to take care of all the pts out there that have diabetes and hypothyroid pts out there...but there are fellowships in these fields for a reason...

And there are plenty of PCPs here and out in the real world that like their clinics and their pts and are respected...I have mad respect for the PCPs out there...mostly because I do not have the patience that these people have!
If prestige or other external forces are what drives you, then you are going to be disappointed...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Endo and rheum are 2 year fellowships with a small minority of research track 3 year ones. So it's already 3+2 the majority of the time.

The only "fast track" option is actually slower - there's options for a 7 year track where you do two years IM and a 5 year research fellowship where the last year you're required to be junior faculty. It's only "faster" in that you spend less time in clinical training so you can focus more time on research.

Ah, okay, which other subspecialties are 2 years? Is Cards and GI 3? But so, for example, Dermatology is what, a 4 year residency? So with 3+2 for Endo or Rheum, you're still training for 5 years while a more 'competitive', higher paying specialty is only 4, could it be possible for Endo and Rheum to be 2+2 for a total of 4? Or do you all find it to be pretty crucial for your knowledge base to have all 3 years of IM?
 
Let me ask...why do you think that if you “study” a little more, you can do endo or rheum, but have to refer out to gi and cards? Do you really think it’s that easy to pick up?

I’m sure all those mid levels all wanna practice a little internal medicine...and those of us that actually practice IM know what it really entails...

You wanna take care of diabetes and some thyroid ...trust me you will get to do that because there are just not enough of us out there to take care of all the pts out there that have diabetes and hypothyroid pts out there...but there are fellowships in these fields for a reason...
People perceive that there are not a lot to learn because these fellowships are 2-yr long, but they conveniently forget that GI was a 2-yr fellowship 2+ decades ago... I dislike our bloated medical education system.
 
Ah, okay, which other subspecialties are 2 years? Is Cards and GI 3? But so, for example, Dermatology is what, a 4 year residency? So with 3+2 for Endo or Rheum, you're still training for 5 years while a more 'competitive', higher paying specialty is only 4, could it be possible for Endo and Rheum to be 2+2 for a total of 4? Or do you all find it to be pretty crucial for your knowledge base to have all 3 years of IM?
Most of these specialists would tell you 2-yr IM is enough. There was that discussion about Neurology 4+ decades ago when it was an IM subspecialty. Neurologists are not killing people after they have parted ways with IM.
 
Most of these specialists would tell you 2-yr IM is enough. There was that discussion about Neurology 4+ decades ago when it was an IM subspecialty. Neurologists are not killing people after they have parted way with IM.

Neurology is a totally different beast. IMO you need good internal medicine exposure and knowledge base to do well in most IM subspecialties.

You could make the argument that you don't need 3 full years of IM in a strong program but there are some ****ty programs out there. It needs to be standardized, I personally think 3 is reasonable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Neurology is a totally different beast. IMO you need good internal medicine exposure and knowledge base to do well in most IM subspecialties.

You could make the argument that you don't need 3 full years of IM in a strong program but there are some ****ty programs out there. It needs to be standardized, I personally think 3 is reasonable.
The last year in these ***ty programs suddenly make these residents strong to go into cardio/GI fellowships. We all know a lot of these things are arbitrary to a certain extent. Why graduate FM docs are not allowed to sub-specialize in Endo, Rheum, A/I?
 
The last year in these ***ty programs suddenly make these residents strong to go into cardio/GI fellowships. We all know a lot of these things are arbitrary to a certain extant. Why graduates FM docs are not allowed to sub-specialize in Endo, Rheum, A/I?

Actually one probably needs to be a stronger IM doc to do well in most of the the non-cards/GI subspecialties of internal medicine. And come on now, the ****ty residencies aren’t creating cards and GI folk.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
The last year in these ***ty programs suddenly make these residents strong to go into cardio/GI fellowships. We all know a lot of these things are arbitrary to a certain extent. Why graduate FM docs are not allowed to sub-specialize in Endo, Rheum, A/I?
Really? I didn’t realize all the cards and gi fellows came for podunk u...all those poor Stanford and mass gen folks I guess are becoming hospitalists...
 
Actually one probably needs to be a stronger IM doc to do well in most of the the non-cards/GI subspecialties of internal medicine. And come on now, the ****ty residencies aren’t creating cards and GI folk.
I’m biased, but I agree...rheum, endo, nephro, ID ...all fairly cerebral and if you have a poor base knowledge of IM, you will have difficulty in doing well in these sub specialties
 
The last year in these ***ty programs suddenly make these residents strong to go into cardio/GI fellowships. We all know a lot of these things are arbitrary to a certain extent. Why graduate FM docs are not allowed to sub-specialize in Endo, Rheum, A/I?
Because they are ABIM sub specialties...if the ABFM wanted to create sub specialty fellowships they can...after all they do have sub specialty fellowships.
 
I’m biased, but I agree...rheum, endo, nephro, ID ...all fairly cerebral and if you have a poor base knowledge of IM, you will have difficulty in doing well in these sub specialties

Would add pulmonary and ccm to that list also. You HAVE to know your IM to do well.
 
Let me ask...why do you think that if you “study” a little more, you can do endo or rheum, but have to refer out to gi and cards? Do you really think it’s that easy to pick up?

I’m sure all those mid levels all wanna practice a little internal medicine...and those of us that actually practice IM know what it really entails...

You wanna take care of diabetes and some thyroid ...trust me you will get to do that because there are just not enough of us out there to take care of all the pts out there that have diabetes and hypothyroid pts out there...but there are fellowships in these fields for a reason...

And there are plenty of PCPs here and out in the real world that like their clinics and their pts and are respected...I have mad respect for the PCPs out there...mostly because I do not have the patience that these people have!
If prestige or other external forces are what drives you, then you are going to be disappointed...

To piggyback on my colleagues statement - I'm going to repost an old comment of mine.

So lets answers it in two parts.

1) Can you *theoretically* practice the full breadth of endocrinology as an internist?

Maybe. I can say that I think I was a pretty good internal medicine resident. I passed my IM boards quite comfortably - a standard deviation or two above the mean with endocrine being my best section. I got a single diabetes question wrong - I still have no idea how. So from that background, I can say that I was probably better at Endocrine than the vast majority of fresh IM graduates.

And yet... When I started Endocrine fellowship, there was plenty that I didn't feel comfortable with. Particularly during my first year, I learned a lot - not just on the nuances of DM management (though there was plenty of that), but also about identification and management of rare endocrinopathies. Most (all?) of this information is available in the literature - but learning it under the guidance of current endocrinologists helped me solidify my practice patterns and guide my reading to identify the good literature from the bad.

Could you drill down, read all the guidelines and references, go through JCEM and the other major journals, go to a few endocrine conferences and get much of the same knowledge? Probably, if you worked at it. But you won't have had the dedicated time to apply it in practice.

Other than thyroid aspirations (which many of us don't do - I don't), there's no specific *procedural* training that you can't pick up as you go along, and you can even probably take a few AACE courses on thyroid aspirations if you were interested.

Insulin pump management is nuanced, but don't worry about that - Medtronic would love to train you to manage insulin pumps (and to only prescribe their products, but that's a different story).

2) Can you *realistically* practice the full breadth of endocrinology as an internist?

No. At least not exclusively. To practice as a subspecialist, you need referrals. To get referrals, you need to be on insurance panels as a subspecialist. To do that, you need board eligibility/certification in said specialty.

You *could* practice primary care, focus on endocrinology, and manage the endocrine problems within your practice while referring out the other issues. But then you're not practicing endocrinology. You're practicing primary care. With all that entails.

When a patient complains to me about their knee pain, I can tell them to follow up with their PCP. When they have fatigue and I've identified it is not from an endocrine etiology, I can tell them to follow up with their PCP. I don't deal with URIs, keeping track of colonoscopies (unless you have Acromegaly) or mammograms (unless I prescribe you estrogen - and I typically decline those consults), etc. I could - I am in fact a board certified internist - but I don't want to. The practice of Endocrinology is very different from the practice of primary care - and to me, that difference was worth the $400k opportunity cost. There are plenty of people for whom that is not true - but it is a very valid point.

I enjoy my job. Pretty sure @rokshana enjoys her job. I'm also reasonably sure neither of us particularly want to do primary care. Oh, and please feel free to send me all of your complex diabetes, osteoporosis, transgender patients... I'd love to see them. Just don't send me undifferentiated fatigue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Ah, okay, which other subspecialties are 2 years? Is Cards and GI 3? But so, for example, Dermatology is what, a 4 year residency? So with 3+2 for Endo or Rheum, you're still training for 5 years while a more 'competitive', higher paying specialty is only 4, could it be possible for Endo and Rheum to be 2+2 for a total of 4? Or do you all find it to be pretty crucial for your knowledge base to have all 3 years of IM?

You do seem a bit fixated on money and prestige...number of years training doesn’t equate to more money...

Frankly I would have liked 3 yrs for endo fellowship...I was just becoming comfortable as an endocrinologist at the end of 2 years...it would have been nice to have a year with more autonomy yet still that safety net... and there were areas that just didn’t get covered in 2 years! The learning curve was so steep that first year out!
 
You do seem a bit fixated on money and prestige...number of years training doesn’t equate to more money...

Frankly I would have liked 3 yrs for endo fellowship...I was just becoming comfortable as an endocrinologist at the end of 2 years...it would have been nice to have a year with more autonomy yet still that safety net... and there were areas that just didn’t get covered in 2 years! The learning curve was so steep that first year out!
Learning curve is steep the first year out regardless. I don't think another year of training would have helped that - at some point, you have to have that year you create your *own* practice patterns.
 
Learning curve is steep the first year out regardless. I don't think another year of training would have helped that - at some point, you have to have that year you create your *own* practice patterns.

I know but I could have gotten more thyroid and parathyroid FNAs done with a 3rd year!
 
Because they are ABIM sub specialties...if the ABFM wanted to create sub specialty fellowships they can...after all they do have sub specialty fellowships.
A/I is also peds.

I don't feel strongly about it, but always thought us FPs would do well at that one.
 
i think in the coming years, rheum will on par with heme/onc in terms of applicant interest and overall competitiveness considering the selection bias.
 
People perceive that there are not a lot to learn because these fellowships are 2-yr long, but they conveniently forget that GI was a 2-yr fellowship 2+ decades ago... I dislike our bloated medical education system.

I did not mean to downplay the importance/knowledge-base of specialties based on their perceived length of training. What I meant by this comment wasn't that you could just "study more" and replace Endos and Rheum physicians, what I meant was, your threshold to finally refer out may be a little higher based on your own experiences. You would still obviously refer patients, and would not try to be a superhero and not, I just meant in terms of initial work-up, simple case management, being less-likely to refer, but then 100% knowing that more complex cases are complex and you refer right away.
 
You do seem a bit fixated on money and prestige...number of years training doesn’t equate to more money...

Frankly I would have liked 3 yrs for endo fellowship...I was just becoming comfortable as an endocrinologist at the end of 2 years...it would have been nice to have a year with more autonomy yet still that safety net... and there were areas that just didn’t get covered in 2 years! The learning curve was so steep that first year out!

I'm really not trying to sound like im focused on prestige and money. My questions are more from a lens of learning and trying to understand. Physician shortages and access to care are important issues, and if length of training is a major hindrance to future physicians, perhaps we ought to re-evaluate how we prepare subspecialists (Or how we pay fellows/residents), especially in a world where reimbursement is only going down, and job opportunities could be limited if you spend 5 years becoming an Endocrinologist just to have a fellow Endo graduate 5 years ago and now hire 4 NPs to "do your job" (not that they actually can) under them, and you have to compete in an up-hill battle against forces already in place while coming out with a -400k opportunity cost as Raryn mentioned above and being forced to take the lowest hanging fruit to try and begin fighting against the mountain of debt you just obtained.. *shrugs* I'm just asking questions to gain better insight into the landscape of healthcare im entering into.
 
I'm really not trying to sound like im focused on prestige and money. My questions are more from a lens of learning and trying to understand. Physician shortages and access to care are important issues, and if length of training is a major hindrance to future physicians, perhaps we ought to re-evaluate how we prepare subspecialists (Or how we pay fellows/residents), especially in a world where reimbursement is only going down, and job opportunities could be limited if you spend 5 years becoming an Endocrinologist just to have a fellow Endo graduate 5 years ago and now hire 4 NPs to "do your job" (not that they actually can) under them, and you have to compete in an up-hill battle against forces already in place while coming out with a -400k opportunity cost as Raryn mentioned above and being forced to take the lowest hanging fruit to try and begin fighting against the mountain of debt you just obtained.. *shrugs* I'm just asking questions to gain better insight into the landscape of healthcare im entering into.

You make some very good points. It's very possible to produce happy (less debt) and qualified specialist with less training. Why should some one going to Endo, rheum, primary care do so many months of ICU?? Why can't research months in residency and fellowship be combined? Academic programs can have one extra year for research as an optional pathway.
The short training will be benefit us financially but not for the hospitals and programs. They lose out on cheap labourers (cheaper than midlevels) who work holidays, extra hours, nights etc. without extra pay.
They will probably propose to increase training citing some bull**** inadequacy (like pediatric hospital medicine fellowship) but will never decrease length of training or medschool (those MD schools won't be happy missing out on your tuition fees)
 
I'm really not trying to sound like im focused on prestige and money. My questions are more from a lens of learning and trying to understand. Physician shortages and access to care are important issues, and if length of training is a major hindrance to future physicians, perhaps we ought to re-evaluate how we prepare subspecialists (Or how we pay fellows/residents), especially in a world where reimbursement is only going down, and job opportunities could be limited if you spend 5 years becoming an Endocrinologist just to have a fellow Endo graduate 5 years ago and now hire 4 NPs to "do your job" (not that they actually can) under them, and you have to compete in an up-hill battle against forces already in place while coming out with a -400k opportunity cost as Raryn mentioned above and being forced to take the lowest hanging fruit to try and begin fighting against the mountain of debt you just obtained.. *shrugs* I'm just asking questions to gain better insight into the landscape of healthcare im entering into.
There's plenty of midlevels out there. I still don't know a single endocrinologist who had trouble finding a job.

I mean, do we all make the money we want, in the location we want, seeing the schedule we want? Well no. But most people I know get two of the three.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
You make some very good points. It's very possible to produce happy (less debt) and qualified specialist with less training. Why should some one going to Endo, rheum, primary care do so many months of ICU?? Why can't research months in residency and fellowship be combined? Academic programs can have one extra year for research as an optional pathway.
The short training will be benefit us financially but not for the hospitals and programs. They lose out on cheap labourers (cheaper than midlevels) who work holidays, extra hours, nights etc. without extra pay.
They will probably propose to increase training citing some bull**** inadequacy (like pediatric hospital medicine fellowship) but will never decrease length of training or medschool (those MD schools won't be happy missing out on your tuition fees)

I spend a great deal of time in the icu... when endocrine issues go bad...they go really bad.

And if I had to pick, I certainly would not pick to have extra research time...

Could med school be shortened...probably...the basics could be done in a year and a half, clinicals too could be done in a year and a half...

Once people figure out that residency interviews probably work out just as well as virtual, zoom Conferences...you won’t need 6 months to do a interview season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Top