- Joined
- Apr 21, 2009
- Messages
- 1,143
- Reaction score
- 62
I think the word "discrimination" is used in its true sense here, not in its "human resources" terms. Discrimination would be prejudice or unfair treatment of an applicant, based on not having fully understood the nuances of his or her educational background.
When a program director chooses to rank a Caribbean graduate who is more competent and on paper has better stats (ie. US resident, US research, US letters of recommendation, US performance on rotations, basic sciences grades, USMLE scores, interview) than the US graduate, they are choosing to discriminate based on a stereotypical assessment of the location of their school and its standards. This in my opinion is unfair, but not illegal. It points to a program that is not interested in hiring the best candidates for the job.
However unfairness is the story of the game and where you went to school is always a big factor in the job that you end up landing. In this case, Caribbean graduates from the respectable Caribbean schools go above and beyond to prove to US programs that they have leveled the playing field by doing well on their standardized exams, US rotations, research, etc. This in my opinion is enough and having spent 18-24 months of your basic sciences abroad should not be an important factor in the selection process.
In general, I think most program directors understand this and in majority of cases the US graduate would land a residency position over the Caribbean graduate only because the US grad has better stats overall. Anything beyond this is equivalent to discrimination however you want to call it.
Waa waa waa... don't want to get discriminated based on your Caribbean school? Go to a US medical school.
Many US schools don't teach to the Step 1 and give their students just 5 weeks to study for it, unlike the common 6 months for many of the Caribbean schools. You ought to be thankful that medicine is not like biglaw.