- Joined
- Dec 21, 2007
- Messages
- 447
- Reaction score
- 0
With so many people talking about the healthcare debate, I'm just curious as to how many pre-meds on SDN are uninsured or have been (for a significant period of time) in the past.
I think it's interesting that people associate being insured with having good health care. I'm insured, but I can't really go to the doctor due to my $1000 deductible. It's great if I have something really serious happen, but I can't afford to see doctors whenever I please or even when I need to.
I think it's interesting that people associate being insured with having good health care. I'm insured, but I can't really go to the doctor due to my $1000 deductible. It's great if I have something really serious happen, but I can't afford to see doctors whenever I please or even when I need to.
Deductibles are the worst kind of cost sharing. High-deductible insurance is catastrophic coverage and encourages people to skimp on primary and secondary prevention.
People need to take individual responsibility for their own health. Part of me wants to side with routine visits being an out-of-pocket expense. You have homeowner insurance to cover you for disaster and car insurance to cover you if you get in an accident, but your homeowners won't pay for the TV that stopped working or for the oil change/brake change. Thus, your health insurance coverage should cover you if you break your arm, but not for your physical checkup. And just like your car warranty, if you don't perform the maintenance required (yearly physical checkups), your warranty is void (some penalty for health insurance).
What irritates me the most is people who say they cannot afford health care or their $10 prescription durgs, but walk into the free clinic on their iphone and wearing the newest MJ shoes. We need to promote personal responsibility.
People need to take individual responsibility for their own health. Part of me wants to side with routine visits being an out-of-pocket expense. You have homeowner insurance to cover you for disaster and car insurance to cover you if you get in an accident, but your homeowners won't pay for the TV that stopped working or for the oil change/brake change. Thus, your health insurance coverage should cover you if you break your arm, but not for your physical checkup. And just like your car warranty, if you don't perform the maintenance required (yearly physical checkups), your warranty is void (some penalty for health insurance).
What irritates me the most is people who say they cannot afford health care or their $10 prescription durgs, but walk into the free clinic on their iphone and wearing the newest MJ shoes. We need to promote personal responsibility.
Replacing your TV doesn't make it less likely to be stolen or (in most cases) make it less likely for your house to burn down. This isn't anywhere near an analogous situation.
Replacing your TV doesn't make it less likely to be stolen or (in most cases) make it less likely for your house to burn down. This isn't anywhere near an analogous situation.
what he is saying is that it's time people became responsible for their own healthcare. his analogies are not meant to compare cars/houses with people. they're meant to convey the meaning of insurance (financial coverage when a very expensive situation arises). $100 says most people would rather buy an iphone and a $50/month data plan before spending that total on routine healthcare. people nowadays expect the govt to do everything for them so they can spend all of their money on nonessential goods.
Routine office care is much more cost effective to cover, it's exactly what we should be taking care of.
If we can get someone in and identify their hypertension or diabetes early, get it under control, they're at a much lower risk for a whole host of more catastrophic diseases at a later date. The cost of office visits and medication is much lower over the long run than multiple surgeries and ICU stays when that MI, Stroke, etc hits.
this is where personal responsibility comes to play.
People need to take individual responsibility for their own health. Part of me wants to side with routine visits being an out-of-pocket expense. You have homeowner insurance to cover you for disaster and car insurance to cover you if you get in an accident, but your homeowners won't pay for the TV that stopped working or for the oil change/brake change. Thus, your health insurance coverage should cover you if you break your arm, but not for your physical checkup. And just like your car warranty, if you don't perform the maintenance required (yearly physical checkups), your warranty is void (some penalty for health insurance).
Yes, I have been unisured despire being seriously ill, and it doesn't change my beliefs one iota. Healthcare does not suddenly become a right the moment one becomes unisured.
I was uninsured fall after graduating until I found employment and their 3 month wait period for benefits ended. It's fine as long as you're healthy and no freak accident happens to you or you don't catch something serious. I was re-insured through my mom during my post-bac prgm (finished in May) and then dropped again Sept. 1 of this year :/ Honestly, lack of health care coverage has been the only downside to "taking time off" after graduation.
What sucks is that I work full-time (for a university nonetheless) and they still haven't responded as to whether or not they're giving us health insurance (since they opted to just not pay us for 6 weeks, I'm going with no...smh). Oh yeah, Cobra costs about $650+ a month, which I legitimately don't have (between applying to med school and not being paid too much to begin with). And I just got a knee injury and have been limping around in pain for a few weeks - hello, natural medicine!
If you see a chick in heels limping around in upcoming interviews, it's me
Right. Either we are a society that bankrupts families with medical bills and rations healthcare based on the wallet biopsy, or we're not. Right now, we are.
Right. Either we are a society that bankrupts families with medical bills and rations healthcare based on the wallet biopsy, or we're not. Right now, we are.
wow I am the only one who picked never uninsured. But actually I am not too certain if I was insured when I was really young...
Routine office care is much more cost effective to cover, it's exactly what we should be taking care of.
There is no "we."
"Society" is a non-entity; it's an amalgam of 300 million selfish individuals who go to the polls ever four years to vote on whose money to steal and how to spend it. "Society" does not bankrupt families- nature does.
Go read the Preamble of the Constitution.
...
There was an chain email circulating around a few months ago that showed Michelle Obama who was helping serve food at a homeless shelter and one of the homeless individuals was taking a picture of Michelle serving her food with her Blackberry. Talk about irony.
1.) Cell phones have basically become essential, and even more essential for someone who is homeless.. because they don't have another phone to rely on, and pay as you go phones can be pretty cheap.
2.) Do you think an event such as Michelle Obama serving food at a homeless shelter might draw individuals who are not actually homeless... maybe people just looking to see the first lady and get a picture of her?
3.) There is a program where donated cell phones are given to women who are at risk for domestic violence because even without an active cell phone plan the phone can be used to dial 911 ...and if it has a charge and a camera it can take a picture.
The cost of office visits and medication is much lower over the long run than multiple surgeries and ICU stays when that MI, Stroke, etc hits.
I think it's interesting that people associate being insured with having good health care. I'm insured, but I can't really go to the doctor due to my $1000 deductible. It's great if I have something really serious happen, but I can't afford to see doctors whenever I please or even when I need to.
AND WE HAVE A WINNER!Routine office care is much more cost effective to cover, it's exactly what we should be taking care of.
Ever hear of photoshop???Well, that might be the case in an ideal world, however, talk to me after you go to clinics and ERs and see this countless times over and over, individuals with the latest high tech gadget but can't buy their medication. You give the benefit of the doubt the first few times, and then it gets old really fast.
Found the chain email:
"Cost of a bowl of soup at homeless shelter $0.00 dollars
Having Michelle Obama serve your soup $0.00 dollars
A homeless person who is receiving government funded meals while taking a picture of the first lady using his $500 Black Berry cell phone... Priceless"
Based on fact or based on assumption?
Of course per individual it's going to be cheaper. But is it truly cheaper to practice defensive and preventative medicine for 250 million+ people when only a small fraction of those people are hospitalized for a serious illness or undergo non-elective surgery or similar?
It could be, but I'm just asking.
AND WE HAVE A WINNER!
Ever hear of photoshop???
Clearly you have never served uninsured or underinsured people.
Get off your pedestal. And make sure karma doesnt hit you in the ass on the way out (especially if your ass is as big as your head)
You don't have to be in medical school to work at clinics that serve uninsured and underinsured people. I've done it for 4 years now.
You don't have to be in medical school to work at clinics that serve uninsured and underinsured people. I've done it for 4 years now.
AND WE HAVE A WINNER!
Ever hear of photoshop???
Clearly you have never served uninsured or underinsured people.
Get off your pedestal. And make sure karma doesnt hit you in the ass on the way out (especially if your ass is as big as your head)
You don't have to be in medical school to work at clinics that serve uninsured and underinsured people. I've done it for 4 years now.
The air is thin around your pedestal isn't it?
Unfortunately for you, your example is not applicable to the majority of people who are uninsured or underinsured and rely on free clinics for basic and comprehensive healthcare needs. Oh, and that $10 prescription isn't just $10. It will probably cost a lot more if you don't have insurance, yes, even for the generic brands (that is if a generic brand is available). Also, its going to take some $$$ to get that prescription, as in a visit to the doctors office for an exam and follow-ups (which, duh, are not free either).So you work in this clinic for 4 years and you have never seen individuals who have the latest technology or named brand shoes, yet can't afford to fill their prescription or better yet come to the FREE clinic? Give me a break...
I saw a mom bring in her 2 kids, who were in their teens, to the free clinic as they didn't have insurance. But both kids were on their iphone, one was listing to his ipod, and their mom (with her D&G purse on top of it all) was playing around on her blackberry. (That's at least $300/month in cell phone bills.) And now I am supposed to feel sorry for them that they can't afford the $10 prescription, or better yet, be taxed to oblivion when I get out of residency to provide universal coverage for them?
Somebody's a wee bit touchy today.....Wow 4 years!?!? Exactly how many hours a week? 2? Please, you're the one on the pedestal. No one gives a s*** about your volunteer work, and it certainly doesn't give you the right to talk like you know more than medical students.
Wal-Mart hires people on at 36-38hrs a week. They do this so that they can refuse health care insurance to millions of their employees who work less than 40hrs a week (so they can make millions in profits obviously). This is common knowledge. These people may be able to afford luxuries like iphones and blackberries (which, by the way, they are offering then at low or free rates these days) but not able to afford healthcare. These people have a right to both luxuries that they can afford with their salaries AND basic effing healthcare.
Luxury-a material object, service, etc., conducive to sumptuous living, usually a delicacy, elegance, or refinement of living rather than a necessity: Gold cufflinks were a luxury not allowed for in his budget
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/luxury
I actually agree with this. People do need better priority skills and money management skills, life skills, etc. I think that there are definitely people who expect something for nothing and lack any kind of personal responsibility. However, that doesn't mean that all people who use free clinics are this way and they shouldn't be perceived as such.This is what I was saying previously, personal responsibility. Apparently, everyone in this country expects free handouts and the government to do your work. I did not receive any free handouts nor do I expect to receive any. As much as I disagree with our president, he did say something recently that actually made sense: When he said that it takes hard work to be successful during his school time speech and that YOU need to work hard. Obviously, this message doesn't get through to everyone.
You're right....luxury was a bad word to use. But I still think someone who works at wal-mart 38hrs a week has a right to a blackberry or any cell phone even if they can't afford private healthcare insurance. A cell phone could run as low as $45 a month while health insurance could be like $1000+ a month. Big difference...Lol. A right to luxuries. This country is going down the tubes faster by the second.